Abstract This paper explores the traditional and prevalent approach to credit risk assessment – the rating system. We first describe the rating systems of the two main credit rating agencies, Standard & Poor's and Moody's. Then we show how an internal rating system in a bank can be organized in order to rate creditors systematically. We suggest adopting a two-tier rating system. First, an obligor rating that can be easily mapped to a default probability bucket. Second, a facility rating that determines the loss parameters in case of default, such as (i) “loss given default” (LGD), which depends on the seniority of the facility and the quality of the gurantees, and (ii) “usage given default” (UGD) for loan commitments, which depends on the nature of the commitment and the rating history of the borrower.
[1]
P. Bennett.
Applying portfolio theory to global bank lending
,
1984
.
[2]
Robert A. McLean,et al.
Credit Risk Measurement: Developments over the Last 20 Years
,
1998
.
[3]
Vahid Esfahanian,et al.
Stability and Transition on Swept Wings.
,
1993
.
[4]
Marjorie B. Platt,et al.
A note on the use of industry-relative ratios in bankruptcy prediction
,
1991
.
[5]
Mark S. Carey,et al.
Credit risk rating systems at large US banks
,
2000
.
[6]
Richard Cantor,et al.
Sovereign Credit Ratings
,
1995
.
[7]
Richard Cantor,et al.
The Credit Rating Industry
,
1995
.
[8]
A critical review of the new capital adequacy framework paper issued by the Basle Committee on Banking Supervision and its implications for the rating agency industry
,
2001
.
[9]
E. Altman,et al.
The Implications of Corporate Bond Ratings Drift
,
1992
.
[10]
Edward I. Altman,et al.
Rating Drift in High-Yield Bonds
,
1992
.
[11]
R. C. West.
A factor-analytic approach to bank condition
,
1985
.
[12]
Edward I. Altman,et al.
The importance and subtlety of credit rating migration
,
1998
.