Synchronicity, instant messaging, and performance among financial traders

Successful animal systems often manage risk through synchronous behavior that spontaneously arises without leadership. In critical human systems facing risk, such as financial markets or military operations, our understanding of the benefits associated with synchronicity is nascent but promising. Building on previous work illuminating commonalities between ecological and human systems, we compare the activity patterns of individual financial traders with the simultaneous activity of other traders—an individual and spontaneous characteristic we call synchronous trading. Additionally, we examine the association of synchronous trading with individual performance and communication patterns. Analyzing empirical data on day traders’ second-to-second trading and instant messaging, we find that the higher the traders’ synchronous trading is, the less likely they are to lose money at the end of the day. We also find that the daily instant messaging patterns of traders are closely associated with their level of synchronous trading. This result suggests that synchronicity and vanguard technology may help traders cope with risky decisions in complex systems and may furnish unique prospects for achieving collective and individual goals.

[1]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population , 2005, Nature.

[2]  J. Stein,et al.  Differences of Opinion, Short-Sales Constraints, and Market Crashes , 2003 .

[3]  Edward Ott,et al.  Theoretical mechanics: Crowd synchrony on the Millennium Bridge , 2005, Nature.

[4]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Cortico–basal ganglia circuit mechanism for a decision threshold in reaction time tasks , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Lu Hong,et al.  Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Katydid synchronous chorusing is an evolutionarily stable outcome of female choice , 1993, Nature.

[7]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network , 2008, WWW.

[8]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  A Neurophysiologic Approach For Studying Team Cognition , 2010 .

[9]  Jurgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization in complex networks , 2008, 0805.2976.

[10]  B. Ermentrout,et al.  An adaptive model for synchrony in the firefly Pteroptyx malaccae , 1991 .

[11]  John R. Cooley,et al.  SEXUAL SIGNALING IN PERIODICAL CICADAS, MAGICICADA SPP. (HEMIPTERA: CICADIDAE) , 2001 .

[12]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Self-organizing processes: The sound of many hands clapping , 2000, Nature.

[13]  B. Cole.  Short-Term Activity Cycles in Ants: Generation of Periodicity by Worker Interaction , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[14]  Robert E. Whaley,et al.  The Investor Fear Gauge , 2000 .

[15]  Esteban Moro,et al.  Market impact and trading profile of hidden orders in stock markets. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Paul C. Tetlock.  Giving Content to Investor Sentiment: The Role of Media in the Stock Market , 2005, The Journal of Finance.

[17]  Charles D. Ellis.  Levels of the Game , 2000 .

[18]  Leonardo L. Gollo,et al.  Dynamical relaying can yield zero time lag neuronal synchrony despite long conduction delays , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  J. Bouchaud,et al.  How Markets Slowly Digest Changes in Supply and Demand , 2008, 0809.0822.

[20]  B. LeBaron,et al.  Simple Technical Trading Rules and the Stochastic Properties of Stock Returns , 1992 .

[21]  Werner Antweiler,et al.  Is All that Talk Just Noise? The Information Content of Internet Stock Message Boards , 2001 .

[22]  Colin Torney,et al.  Context-dependent interaction leads to emergent search behavior in social aggregates , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Urs Bruegger,et al.  Global Microstructures: The Virtual Societies of Financial Markets1 , 2002, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  Chris Arney.  Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order , 2007 .

[25]  George Sugihara,et al.  Complex systems: Ecology for bankers , 2008, Nature.

[26]  Edward Ott,et al.  Theoretical mechanics: crowd synchrony on the Millennium Bridge. , 2005 .

[27]  I. Couzin.  Collective minds , 2007, Nature.

[28]  D. Sumpter.  The principles of collective animal behaviour , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  R. Pachura.  WHEN IS ENOUGH, ENOUGH? , 1998 .

[30]  Paul C. Tetlock.  Giving Content to Investor Sentiment: The Role of Media in the Stock Market , 2005, The Journal of Finance.

[31]  Daniel J. Fenn,et al.  Effect of social group dynamics on contagion. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  F. Galton.  Vox Populi , 1907, Nature.

[33]  Jean-Pierre Eckmann,et al.  Entropy of dialogues creates coherent structures in e-mail traffic. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  B. K. Szymanski,et al.  The Impact of Competing Time Delays in Coupled Stochastic Systems , 2010, 1011.2957.

[35]  R. Merton.  Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. , 1957 .

[36]  Boleslaw K. Szymanski,et al.  Network synchronization in a noisy environment with time delays , 2012 .

[37]  Kerry Back,et al.  Long-Lived Information and Intraday Patterns , 1998 .