A comparison of sensory-motor activity during speech in first and second languages.

A foreign language (L2) learned after childhood results in an accent. This functional neuroimaging study investigated speech in L2 as a sensory-motor skill. The hypothesis was that there would be an altered response in auditory and somatosensory association cortex, specifically the planum temporale and parietal operculum, respectively, when speaking in L2 relative to L1, independent of rate of speaking. These regions were selected for three reasons. First, an influential computational model proposes that these cortices integrate predictive feedforward and postarticulatory sensory feedback signals during articulation. Second, these adjacent regions (known as Spt) have been identified as a "sensory-motor interface" for speech production. Third, probabilistic anatomical atlases exist for these regions, to ensure the analyses are confined to sensory-motor differences between L2 and L1. The study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and participants produced connected overt speech. The first hypothesis was that there would be greater activity in the planum temporale and the parietal operculum when subjects spoke in L2 compared with L1, one interpretation being that there is less efficient postarticulatory sensory monitoring when speaking in the less familiar L2. The second hypothesis was that this effect would be observed in both cerebral hemispheres. Although Spt is considered to be left-lateralized, this is based on studies of covert speech, whereas overt speech is accompanied by sensory feedback to bilateral auditory and somatosensory cortices. Both hypotheses were confirmed by the results. These findings provide the basis for future investigations of sensory-motor aspects of language learning using serial fMRI studies.

[1]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  The neural substrates underlying word generation: a bilingual functional-imaging study. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production , 2006, Brain and Language.

[3]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[4]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  Neural substrates of vocalization feedback monitoring in primate auditory cortex , 2008, Nature.

[5]  G. Hickok,et al.  Auditory–Motor Interaction Revealed by fMRI: Speech, Music, and Working Memory in Area Spt , 2003 .

[6]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The cortical organization of speech processing , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Istvan Ulbert,et al.  Multisensory convergence in auditory cortex, II. Thalamocortical connections of the caudal superior temporal plane , 2007, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  Christine Fennema-Notestine,et al.  More “mapping” in brain mapping: Statistical comparison of effects , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[10]  Cheryl Frenck-Mestre,et al.  Articulation in early and late bilinguals' two languages: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Neuroreport.

[11]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Nonparametric estimation of temporal autocorrelation in FMRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[12]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Auditory-somatosensory multisensory processing in auditory association cortex: an fMRI study. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  T. Hackett,et al.  Multisensory convergence in auditory cortex, I. Cortical connections of the caudal superior temporal plane in macaque monkeys , 2007, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  T. Griffiths,et al.  Distinct Mechanisms for Processing Spatial Sequences and Pitch Sequences in the Human Auditory Brain , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Interhemispheric anatomical differences in human primary auditory cortex: probabilistic mapping and volume measurement from magnetic resonance scans. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  Jason A. Tourville,et al.  The integration of large-scale neural network modeling and functional brain imaging in speech motor control , 2010, NeuroImage.

[18]  Nivja H. Jong,et al.  Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[19]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Left putaminal activation when speaking a second language: evidence from PET. , 1994, Neuroreport.

[20]  Kayoko Okada,et al.  Area Spt in the Human Planum Temporale Supports Sensory-motor Integration for Speech Processing Establishing the Existence of Distinct Sen- Sory versus Motor Activation Patterns Would Establish That , 2022 .

[21]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  Convergent Cortical Representation of Semantic Processing in Bilinguals , 1999, Brain and Language.

[22]  A. Schleicher,et al.  The human parietal operculum. I. Cytoarchitectonic mapping of subdivisions. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  小野 道夫,et al.  Atlas of the Cerebral Sulci , 1990 .

[24]  K. Zilles,et al.  Polymodal Motion Processing in Posterior Parietal and Premotor Cortex A Human fMRI Study Strongly Implies Equivalencies between Humans and Monkeys , 2001, Neuron.

[25]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[26]  Jason A. Tourville,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech , 2008, NeuroImage.

[27]  I. R. MacKay,et al.  Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  A. Galaburda,et al.  Cytoarchitectonic organization of the human auditory cortex , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[29]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[30]  S. Nagarajan,et al.  Speech target modulates speaking induced suppression in auditory cortex , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[31]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[32]  Joy Hirsch,et al.  Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages , 1997, Nature.

[33]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[34]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference , 2004, NeuroImage.

[35]  Judy Pa,et al.  A parietal–temporal sensory–motor integration area for the human vocal tract: Evidence from an fMRI study of skilled musicians , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  C. Price,et al.  A functional imaging study of translation and language switching. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  R. Turner,et al.  Language Control in the Bilingual Brain , 2006, Science.

[39]  Jonathan H. Venezia,et al.  Hierarchical organization of human auditory cortex: evidence from acoustic invariance in the response to intelligible speech. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  Ralph-Axel Müller,et al.  Effects of generation mode in fMRI adaptations of semantic fluency: Paced production and overt speech , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  C Büchel,et al.  Brain regions involved in articulation , 1999, The Lancet.

[42]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Speech production: Wernicke, Broca and beyond. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[43]  Maneesh C. Patel,et al.  Perceptual Systems Controlling Speech Production , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  M. Seghier,et al.  Language control and lexical competition in bilinguals: an event-related FMRI study. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data , 2001, NeuroImage.