Optimal modes and levels of integration, and the identification of cross-functional coordination deficiencies in concurrent engineering

In this investigation, it was proposed that achieving a fit between coordination requirements and the institution of optimal modes and levels of integration will result in optimal patterns of information processing, but will not necessarily minimize coordination problems or deficiencies. Data were collected at three time intervals from engineers and scientists working in 24 department of defense project offices and laboratories. Using a content analysis of narrative responses, 16 coordination problems or deficiencies were identified. As expected, the results did not demonstrate that the group of organizations that approached optimal levels of integration exhibited fewer coordination deficiencies than those organizations that exhibited suboptimal levels. Furthermore, the pattern of coordination deficiencies did not decline across time in those organizations that approached optimal levels. These results suggest that in order for research in concurrent engineering to advance, greater focus should be applied to the identification and effective management of coordination problems and deficiencies.

[1]  J. D. Sherman,et al.  Environmental uncertainty, organizational integration, and new product development effectiveness: a test of contingency theory - A contingency analysis , 1998 .

[2]  J. D. Sherman,et al.  Differential effects of the primary forms of cross functional integration on product development cycle time , 2000 .

[3]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Integrative mechanisms for multiteam integration: Findings from five case studies , 1998 .

[4]  L. Phillips.  Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing , 1981 .

[5]  D. Tjosvold.  Cooperative and Competitive Interdependence , 1988 .

[6]  Michael Song,et al.  Message and source factors, market uncertainty, and extrafunctional information processing: hypotheses and empirical evidence , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[7]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Competing by design: the power of organizational architecture , 1998 .

[8]  Kenneth B. Kahn.  Interdepartmental Integration: A Definition with Implications for Product Development Performance , 1996 .

[9]  Diane E. Bailey,et al.  Challenges of integration in semiconductor manufacturing firms , 1999 .

[10]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Designing system development projects for organizational integration , 1999 .

[11]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[12]  W. Souder.  Managing relations between R&D and marketing in new product development projects☆ , 1988 .

[13]  D. Wilemon,et al.  A Model for Studying R&D–Marketing Interface in the Product Innovation Process , 1986 .

[14]  Frithjof Weber,et al.  Computer Based Initiatives for Implementing and Sustaining Concurrent Engineering , 2002, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[15]  J. Daniel Sherman.  21st Century Organizations and the Basis for Achieving Optimal Cross-Functional Integration in New Product Development , 2004 .

[16]  L R Burns,et al.  Matrix management in hospitals: testing theories of matrix structure and development. , 1989, Administrative science quarterly.

[17]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The impact of new product strategies , 1983 .

[18]  A. Griffin,et al.  Patterns of Communication Among Marketing, Engineering and Manufacturing-A Comparison Between Two New Product Teams , 1992 .

[19]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Marketing/R&D Interaction in New Product Development: Implications for New Product Success Rates , 1990 .

[20]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[21]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Wage Inequities, Productivity and Work Quality , 1963 .

[22]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[23]  M. Parry,et al.  R&D-marketing integration in Japanese high-technology firms: Hypotheses and empirical evidence , 1993 .

[24]  Matts Carlsson,et al.  Aspects of the integration of technical functions for efficient product development , 1991 .

[25]  Jay W. Lorsch.  Product innovation and organization , 1965 .

[26]  R. Daft,et al.  A Tentative Exploration into the Amount and Equivocality of Information Processing in Organizational Work Units. , 1981 .

[27]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[28]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Organisational structures to support concurrent engineering in construction , 2002, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[29]  Edward F. McDonough,et al.  An empirical study of the relationships among co-location, integration, performance, and satisfaction , 1997 .

[30]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Use of Dependency Structure Matrices for Product Development Cycle Time Reduction , 1998 .

[31]  Arthur G. Butler,et al.  Project Management: A Study in Organizational Conflict , 1973 .

[32]  Robert C. Ford,et al.  Cross-Functional Structures: A Review and Integration of Matrix Organization and Project Management , 1992 .

[33]  F. Caeldries,et al.  Architectural redesign, interpersonal communication, and learning in R&D , 1996 .

[34]  M. Schrage.  Shared Minds: The New Technologies of Collaboration , 1990 .

[35]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  The R&D-marketing interface in Japanese high-technology firms , 1992 .

[36]  D. Deschoolmeester,et al.  R&D-marketing integration mechanisms, communication flows, and innovation success , 1994 .

[37]  R. Cooper.  New Product Strategies: What Distinguishes the Top Performers? , 1984 .

[38]  Patrick R. Laughlin,et al.  Ability and Group Problem Solving. , 1978 .

[39]  W. Joyce.  Matrix Organization: A Social Experiment , 1986 .

[40]  J. K. McCollum,et al.  The effects of matrix organization size and number of project assignments on performance , 1991 .

[41]  David N. Ford,et al.  The Liar's Club: Concealing Rework in Concurrent Development , 2003, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[42]  W. Souder,et al.  Managing New Product Innovations , 1987 .

[43]  David Wilemon,et al.  R & D and marketing dialogue in high-tech firms , 1985 .

[44]  J. D. Sherman.  Lessons Learned from the Early Stages of Development of the Guardrail Common Sensor for the Radical Reduction of Cycle Time , 2003 .

[45]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .