Automatic segmentation of the hippocampus and the amygdala driven by hybrid constraints: Method and validation

The segmentation from MRI of macroscopically ill-defined and highly variable structures, such as the hippocampus (Hc) and the amygdala (Am), requires the use of specific constraints. Here, we describe and evaluate a fast fully automatic hybrid segmentation that uses knowledge derived from probabilistic atlases and anatomical landmarks, adapted from a semi-automatic method. The algorithm was designed at the outset for application on images from healthy subjects and patients with hippocampal sclerosis. Probabilistic atlases were built from 16 healthy subjects, registered using SPM5. Local mismatch in the atlas registration step was automatically detected and corrected. Quantitative evaluation with respect to manual segmentations was performed on the 16 young subjects, with a leave-one-out strategy, a mixed cohort of 8 controls and 15 patients with epilepsy with variable degrees of hippocampal sclerosis, and 8 healthy subjects acquired on a 3 T scanner. Seven performance indices were computed, among which error on volumes RV and Dice overlap K. The method proved to be fast, robust and accurate. For Hc, results with the new method were: 16 young subjects {RV = 5%, K = 87%}; mixed cohort {RV = 8%, K = 84%}; 3 T cohort {RV = 9%, K = 85%}. Results were better than with atlas-based (thresholded probability map) or semi-automatic segmentations. Atlas mismatch detection and correction proved efficient for the most sclerotic Hc. For Am, results were: 16 young controls {RV = 7%, K = 85%}; mixed cohort {RV = 19%, K = 78%}; 3 T cohort {RV = 10%, K = 77%}. Results were better than with the semi-automatic segmentation, and were also better than atlas-based segmentations for the 16 young subjects.

[1]  Vincent Barra,et al.  Automatic segmentation of subcortical brain structures in MR images using information fusion , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  S. Joshi,et al.  Mesial temporal sclerosis and temporal lobe epilepsy: MR imaging deformation-based segmentation of the hippocampus in five patients. , 2000, Radiology.

[3]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Atlas-based hippocampus segmentation in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment , 2005, NeuroImage.

[4]  J. Barnes,et al.  A comparison of methods for the automated calculation of volumes and atrophy rates in the hippocampus , 2008, NeuroImage.

[5]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Least Biased Target Selection in Probabilistic Atlas Construction , 2005, MICCAI.

[6]  H. Benali,et al.  BrainVISA: Software platform for visualization and analysis of multi-modality brain data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[7]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion , 2006, NeuroImage.

[8]  Ali R. Khan,et al.  FreeSurfer-initiated fully-automated subcortical brain segmentation in MRI using Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping , 2008, NeuroImage.

[9]  Robert Barber,et al.  Validation of a fully automated hippocampal segmentation method on patients with dementia , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Automated brain tissue assessment in the elderly and demented population: Construction and validation of a sub-volume probabilistic brain atlas , 2005, NeuroImage.

[11]  Qian Wang,et al.  Construction and Validation of Mean Shape Atlas Templates for Atlas-Based Brain Image Segmentation , 2005, IPMI.

[12]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Automatic detection and quantification of hippocampal atrophy on MRI in temporal lobe epilepsy: A proof-of-principle study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[13]  S. Resnick,et al.  Measuring Size and Shape of the Hippocampus in MR Images Using a Deformable Shape Model , 2002, NeuroImage.

[14]  J. S. Duncan,et al.  A Longitudinal Quantitative MRI Study of Community-Based Patients with Chronic Epilepsy and Newly Diagnosed Seizures: Methodology and Preliminary Findings , 2001, NeuroImage.

[15]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance images , 2004, NeuroImage.

[16]  Olaf B. Paulson,et al.  MR-based automatic delineation of volumes of interest in human brain PET images using probability maps , 2005, NeuroImage.

[17]  A. Dale,et al.  NeurotechniqueWhole Brain Segmentation : Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures , 2002 .

[18]  M W Vannier,et al.  Three-dimensional hippocampal MR morphometry with high-dimensional transformation of a neuroanatomic atlas. , 1997, Radiology.

[19]  Martin Styner,et al.  Subcortical structure segmentation using probabilistic atlas priors , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[20]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  Fusion of spatial relationships for guiding recognition, example of brain structure recognition in 3D MRI , 2005, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[21]  Marie Chupin,et al.  Fully automatic hippocampus segmentation discriminates between early Alzheimer’s disease and normal aging , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[22]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Automatic 3-D segmentation of internal structures of the head in MR images using a combination of similarity and free-form transformations. I. Methodology and validation on normal subjects , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  A Hierarchical Algorithm for MR Brain Image Parcellation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Xiao Han,et al.  Atlas Renormalization for Improved Brain MR Image Segmentation Across Scanner Platforms , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Unified segmentation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[26]  Dominique Hasboun,et al.  Anatomically constrained region deformation for the automated segmentation of the hippocampus and the amygdala: Method and validation on controls and patients with Alzheimer’s disease , 2007, NeuroImage.