Scan-rescan and intra-observer variability of magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerosis at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.

Carotid atherosclerosis measurements for eight subjects at baseline and 14 +/- 2 days later were examined using 1.5 T and 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A single observer blinded to field strength, subject and timepoint manually segmented carotid artery wall and lumen boundaries in randomized images in five measurement trials. Mean increases in the signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) for T1-weighted images acquired at 3.0 T compared to 1.5 T were 90% (scan) and 80% (rescan). Despite significantly improved SNR and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for images acquired at 3.0 T, vessel wall volume (VWV) intra-observer variability was not significantly different using coefficients of variation (COV), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). VWV interscan variability and consistency at both field strengths were not statistically different (1.5 T/3.0 T COV = 5.7%/7.8%, R(2) = 0.96 for 1.5 T and R(2) = 0.87 for 3.0 T). A two-way analysis of variance showed a VWV dependence on field strength but not scan timepoint. In addition, a paired t-test showed significant differences in VWV measured at 3.0 T as compared to 1.5 T. These results suggest that although images acquired at 1.5 T have lower SNR and CNR VWV, measurement variability was not significantly different from 3.0 T VWV and that VWV is field-strength dependent which may be an important consideration for longitudinal studies.

[1]  D H Blankenhorn,et al.  Beneficial effects of combined colestipol-niacin therapy on coronary atherosclerosis and coronary venous bypass grafts. , 1987, JAMA.

[2]  Fei Liu,et al.  MRI of atherosclerosis in clinical trials , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[3]  R. Cury,et al.  Vulnerable Plaque Detection by 3.0 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[4]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[5]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Quantification of carotid plaque volume measurements using 3D ultrasound imaging. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[7]  R. Senior,et al.  Carotid ultrasound imaging: an effective technique for detecting early atherosclerosis-vascular screening for cardiovascular disease has come of age. , 2007, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[8]  P. Lauterbur,et al.  The sensitivity of the zeugmatographic experiment involving human samples , 1979 .

[9]  S. String Three dimensional ultrasound imaging of carotid artery plaques: Steinke W, Hennerici M. J Cardiovasc Tech 1989;8:15–22 , 1990 .

[10]  D. Sackett,et al.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  A. Fenster,et al.  Validation of 3D ultrasound vessel wall volume: an imaging phenotype of carotid atherosclerosis. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  M. McConnell,et al.  Multicontrast black‐blood MRI of carotid arteries: Comparison between 1.5 and 3 tesla magnetic field strengths , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Theoretical and experimental quantification of carotid plaque volume measurements made by three-dimensional ultrasound using test phantoms. , 2002, Medical physics.

[14]  M. Fisher,et al.  Effects of therapy with cholestyramine on progression of coronary arteriosclerosis: results of the NHLBI Type II Coronary Intervention Study. , 1984, Circulation.

[15]  J. Barth Carotid intima media thickness and beyond. , 2004, Current drug targets. Cardiovascular & haematological disorders.

[16]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Multislice dark‐blood carotid artery wall imaging: A 1.5 T and 3.0 T comparison , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  H. Hodis,et al.  George Lyman Duff Memorial Lecture. Arterial imaging and atherosclerosis reversal. , 1994, Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis : a journal of vascular biology.

[18]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Measurement of Carotid Plaque Volume by 3-Dimensional Ultrasound , 2004, Stroke.

[19]  B Buis,et al.  Diet, lipoproteins, and the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. The Leiden Intervention Trial. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  B. Williams,et al.  AETIOLOGY OF STRIAE GRAVIDARUM , 1974 .

[21]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  3D Ultrasound Measurement of Change in Carotid Plaque Volume: A Tool for Rapid Evaluation of New Therapies , 2005, Stroke.

[22]  Matthias Stuber,et al.  Assessment of the carotid artery by MRI at 3T: A study on reproducibility , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  P R Detmer,et al.  Echolucent regions in carotid plaque: preliminary analysis comparing three-dimensional histologic reconstructions to sonographic findings. , 1994, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.