Efficiency of Universities and Research-Focused Institutions Worldwide: An Empirical DEA Investigation Based on Institutional Publication Numbers and Estimated Academic Staff Numbers

One of the core indicators in the field of scientometrics is the number of papers published by a unit within a given period. However, such indicators can only be assessed properly by considering the unit’s available resources. When evaluating the efficiency of institutions worldwide, the problem concerning the availability of internationally standardized data arises. While on the output side consistent publication indicators are available, these data are frequently not available on the input side. We therefore introduce a new input indicator based on the authors’ mentions in the institutions’ papers. We calculate efficiency scores for more than 4,800 universities and other research-focused institutions worldwide. “Harvard University” is the best performing institution (in all years) followed by many other institutions from Northern America or Europe. The results of the study show that institutions in the Pacific region have the highest average efficiency scores, followed by Northern America and Western Europe. While many results of this study are scarcely surprising, it is the first time that an efficiency analysis is being performed for a multitude of institutions worldwide using a standardized input indicator. It seems that the new proxy indicator based on co-authors is suitable for reflecting institutional staff numbers.

[1]  Lars Herberholz,et al.  Efficiency of European Universities: A Comparison of Peers , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[2]  Oleg Badunenko,et al.  Simar and Wilson two-stage efficiency analysis for Stata , 2019, The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata.

[3]  Antonietta Mira,et al.  Scientific output scales with resources. A comparison of US and European universities , 2019, PloS one.

[4]  Tommaso Agasisti,et al.  The transient and persistent efficiency of Italian and German universities: a stochastic frontier analysis , 2019, Applied Economics.

[5]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Applied Evaluative Informetrics , 2017, Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Scientific and Scholarly Communication.

[6]  T. Agasisti,et al.  The relevance of knowledge transfer for universities’ efficiency scores: an empirical approximation on the Spanish public higher education system , 2017 .

[7]  Kristof De Witte,et al.  Efficiency in education: a review of literature and a way forward , 2017, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[8]  Mehdi Rhaiem,et al.  Measurement and determinants of academic research efficiency: a systematic review of the evidence , 2017, Scientometrics.

[9]  Jesper W. Schneider,et al.  Performance-based funding models and researcher behavior: An analysis of the influence of the Norwegian Publication Indicator at the individual level , 2016 .

[10]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Measuring the productivity of national R&D systems : challenges in cross-national comparisons of R&D input and publication output indicators , 2016 .

[11]  M. Clermont Effectiveness and efficiency of research in Germany over time: an analysis of German business schools between 2001 and 2009 , 2016, Scientometrics.

[12]  Kaare Aagaard,et al.  Research funding and national academic performance: Examination of a Danish success story , 2016 .

[13]  Gianni De Fraja,et al.  How Much is that Star in the Window? Professorial Salaries and Research Performance in UK Universities , 2016 .

[14]  Adela García Aracil,et al.  The differential effects of competitive funding on the production frontier and the efficiency of universities , 2016 .

[15]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  The elephant in the room: The problem of quantifying productivity in evaluative scientometrics , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[16]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Productivity, performance, efficiency, impact - What do we measure anyway?: Some comments on the paper "A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators" by Abramo and D'Angelo , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[17]  Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz,et al.  Exploring efficiency differentials between Italian and Polish universities, 2001–11 , 2016 .

[18]  S. Rijcke,et al.  Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics , 2015, Nature.

[19]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Francesc Solé Parellada,et al.  What Are We Measuring When Evaluating Universities’ Efficiency? , 2012 .

[21]  J. Johnes Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Application to the Measurement of Efficiency in Higher Education. , 2006 .

[22]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[23]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[24]  Sabine Gralka,et al.  Stochastic frontier analysis in higher education: A systematic review , 2018 .

[25]  Andreas Diekmann,et al.  Das Forschungsrating des Wissenschaftsrats für die Soziologie in Deutschland revisited , 2015 .

[26]  Vietnamese Manufacturing Firms STOCHASTIC FRONTIER ANALYSIS OF , 2014 .

[27]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[28]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  An exploratory analysis of the cost structure of Higher Education in England , 2005 .