Performance analysis for unicast and multicast traffic in broadcast-and-select WDM networks

This paper presents the analysis of multicasting performance in broadcast-and-select wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) networks from two aspects: multicast session length and multicast group size. The protocol analyzed in this paper is based on an existing protocol which can schedule unicast and multicast traffic. The packet distance, determined by the Euclidean distance of session length and the group size of a multicast distance is compared with the multicast distance to select the most appropriate scheduling method for multicast packets. Further comparisons on channel utilization and packet delay show that the session length affects the channel dominance significantly and the group size determines the range of multicast distance such that the performances will remain the same. In addition, multicast traffic with larger mean session length or mean group size will make some specific scheduling strategies fail to achieve optimal performance. If the multicast distance is properly chosen, performance tradeoffs can be made under multicasting environments with large session length or large group size.

[1]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Probability distribution of the receiver busy time in a multicasting local lightwave network , 1997, Proceedings of ICC'97 - International Conference on Communications.

[2]  Krishna M. Sivalingam,et al.  Pre-allocation media access control protocols for multiple access WDM photonic networks , 1992, SIGCOMM 1992.

[3]  Michael S. Borella,et al.  A reservation-based multicasting protocol for WDM local lightwave networks , 1995, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Communications ICC '95.

[4]  George N. Rouskas,et al.  Multidestination Communication Over Tunable-Receiver Single-Hop WDM Networks , 1997, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[5]  Eytan Modiano Unscheduled multicasts in WDM broadcast-and-select networks , 1998, Proceedings. IEEE INFOCOM '98, the Conference on Computer Communications. Seventeenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Gateway to the 21st Century (Cat. No.98.

[6]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  The advantages of partitioning multicast transmissions in a single-hop optical WDM network , 1997, Proceedings of ICC'97 - International Conference on Communications.

[7]  Krishna M. Sivalingam,et al.  Low-Complexity Multiple Access Protocols for Wavelength-Division Multiplexed Photonic Networks , 1993, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[8]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Efficient Scheduling of Nonuniform Packet Traffic in a WDM/TDM Local Lightwave Network with Arbitrary Transceiver Tuning Latencies , 1996, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[9]  George N. Rouskas,et al.  Scheduling of multicast traffic in tunable-receiver WDM networks with non-negligible tuning latencies , 1997, SIGCOMM '97.

[10]  A. S. Acampora,et al.  Protocols for Optical Star-Coupler Network Using WDM: Performance and Complexity Study , 1993, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[11]  Pierre A. Humblet,et al.  An Efficient Communication Protocol for High-Speed Packet-Switched Multichannel Networks , 1993, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[12]  Jonathan S. Turner,et al.  The Challenge of Multipoint Communication , 1987 .

[13]  Sy-Yen Kuo,et al.  A combinational media access protocol for multicast traffic in single-hop WDM LANs , 1998, IEEE GLOBECOM 1998 (Cat. NO. 98CH36250).

[14]  B. Mukherjee,et al.  WDM-based local lightwave networks. I. Single-hop systems , 1992, IEEE Network.