Constraints in the performance of bimanual tasks and their expression in unskilled and skilled subjects

ABSTRACT Unskilled and skilled subjects were asked to perform a variety of bimanual tapping tasks. Three major effects were seen. First, right-handers performed dual tasks better when the preferred hand took the “figure” and when the nonpreferred hand took the “ground” of the dual movement. This effect was not seen in left-handers. Second, subjects performed a simple slow/fast dual task better when they commenced the task with the fast rather than with the slow hand. This effect was seen in right- and lefthanders. Third, both unskilled and skilled subjects showed marked interdependence of movements such that performance of one hand was a function of movements in the other hand. The results are in agreement with a model that postulates the presence of a superordinate control mechanism that initiates action in subordinate control mechanisms, which in turn set the movement trajectories in the two hands. The results also show that attention is an important factor in the interaction between these two levels of...

[1]  L. H. Shaffer,et al.  Performances of Chopin, Bach, and Bartok: Studies in motor programming , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  D Goodman,et al.  On the coordination of two-handed movements. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  H. Honda,et al.  Rightward Superiority of Eye Movements in a Bimanual Aiming Task , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  P. N. Kugler,et al.  Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear, limit cycle oscillatory processes: theory and data. , 1981, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  A. Wing.  Timing and Co-Ordination of Repetitive Bimanual Movements , 1982 .

[6]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  Bimanual Movement Control: Information processing and Interaction Effects , 1984 .

[7]  M. Peters,et al.  Attentional Asymmetries during Concurrent Bimanual Performance , 1981 .

[8]  E. Titchener.  Scientific Books: Lectures on the Elementary Psychology of Feeling and Attention , 1909 .

[9]  M. Annett.  A classification of hand preference by association analysis. , 1970, British journal of psychology.

[10]  H. Liepmann.  Drei Aufsätze aus dem Apraxiegebiet , 1908 .

[11]  J. Levy,et al.  Variations in writing posture and cerebral organization. , 1976, Science.

[12]  N. Geschwind.  The apraxias: neural mechanisms of disorders of learned movement. , 1975, American scientist.

[13]  John Morton,et al.  Rhythm and dominance , 1981, Cognition.

[14]  J. Duncan.  Divided attention: the whole is more than the sum of its parts. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  M. Kinsbourne.  The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. , 1970, Acta psychologica.

[16]  M. Peters.  Simultaneous performance of two motor activities: The factor of timing , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  B Durding,et al.  Left-handers and right-handers compared on a motor task. , 1979, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  D Deutsch,et al.  The generation of two isochronous sequences in parallel , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  M Allen.  Models of hemispheric specialization. , 1983, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  Michael Peters.  Timing of Initiation and Termination of Dual Manual Movements , 1984 .

[21]  P. McLeod.  A Dual Task Response Modality Effect: Support for Multiprocessor Models of Attention , 1977 .

[22]  M. Peters.  8 – Differentiation and Lateral Specialization in Motor Development , 1983 .

[23]  R. Nass.  Ontogenesis of Hemispheric Specialization: Apraxia Associated with Congenital Left Hemisphere Lesions , 1983, Perceptual and motor skills.

[24]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Doing two things at once: The role of temporal compatibility , 1979 .

[25]  P. Gjerde.  Attentional capacity dysfunction and arousal in schizophrenia. , 1983, Psychological bulletin.