Nothing is as Clear as Unclear: Iivari's response

[1]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Levels of Abstraction as a Conceptual Framework for an Information System , 1989, ISCO.

[2]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  A paradigmatic analysis of contemporary schools of IS development , 1991 .

[3]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[4]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Hierarchical spiral model for information system and software development. Part 1: Theoretical background , 1990 .

[5]  J. Aken.  Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[6]  N. Cross.  Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science , 2001, Design Issues.

[7]  I. Niiniluoto.  The aim and structure of applied research , 1993 .

[8]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Being Proactive: Where Action Research Meets Design Research , 2005, ICIS.

[9]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Information Systems as a Design Science , 2005 .

[10]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Towards a distinctive body of knowledge for Information Systems experts: coding ISD process knowledge in two IS journals , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[11]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Hierarchical spiral model for information system and software development. Part 2: design process , 1990 .

[13]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..