Pupil Dilation and Cognitive Reflection as Predictors of Performance on the Iowa Gambling Task

Risky decisions involve cognitive and emotional factors. As the primary test for the Somatic Marker Hypothesis (SMH), the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) examines these factors. Skin conductance shows anticipatory physiological responses on the IGT supporting SMH. Pupil dilation offers an alternative physiological marker. Predictive effects of anticipatory pupillary responses to positive and negative decks on IGT performance were examined in an extended IGT. The extended Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) examined the relationship between reflective thinking and IGT performance. Data demonstrated correlations between reflective thinking and performance from the second block onwards and that task learning continued into the additional blocks performance was not optimized even in the final block. Regression analysis showed both anticipatory pupil dilation for disadvantageous and advantageous decks, and reflective thinking were strong predictors of IGT performance. While both emotional and reflective processes are implicated in IGT performance, analytic cognition is more important than traditionally acknowledged.

[1]  B. Newell,et al.  Degraded conditions: Confounds in the study of decision making , 2014, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  D. Kahneman.  A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[3]  Antonio Damasio,et al.  The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[4]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Computational roles for dopamine in behavioural control , 2004, Nature.

[5]  S. Sara,et al.  Network reset: a simplified overarching theory of locus coeruleus noradrenaline function , 2005, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  Christof Koch,et al.  Fully Formatted Pdf and Full Text (html) Versions Will Be Made Available Soon. Pupil Dilation Betrays the Timing of Decisions , 2022 .

[7]  A. Glöckner,et al.  Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making , 2010 .

[8]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural Activity in the Human Brain Relating to Uncertainty and Arousal during Anticipation , 2001, Neuron.

[9]  W. Einhäuser,et al.  Pupil Dilation Signals Surprise: Evidence for Noradrenaline’s Role in Decision Making , 2011, Front. Neurosci..

[10]  Edward Stupple,et al.  Working Memory, Cognitive Miserliness and Logic as Predictors of Performance on the Cognitive Reflection Test , 2013, CogSci.

[11]  V. Bolshakov,et al.  Emotional enhancement of memory: how norepinephrine enables synaptic plasticity , 2010, Molecular Brain.

[12]  M. Brand,et al.  Executive functions, categorization of probabilities, and learning from feedback: What does really matter for decision making under explicit risk conditions? , 2011, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[13]  O. Turnbull,et al.  Artificial time constraints on the Iowa Gambling Task: The effects on behavioural performance and subjective experience , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[14]  Claudio Lavin,et al.  Pupil dilation signals uncertainty and surprise in a learning gambling task , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[15]  D. Sheffield,et al.  Stress and Risky Decision Making: Cognitive Reflection, Emotional Learning or Both. , 2017 .

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dissociable Neural Responses in Human Reward Systems , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  A. Damasio,et al.  Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy , 1997, Science.

[18]  S. Frederick.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[19]  A. Damasio,et al.  Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex , 1994, Cognition.

[20]  S. Quartz,et al.  Reason, emotion and decision-making: risk and reward computation with feeling , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test , 2014 .

[22]  Theodore D. Satterthwaite,et al.  Dissociable but inter-related systems of cognitive control and reward during decision making: Evidence from pupillometry and event-related fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[23]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  Do the Seconds Turn Into Hours? Relationships between Sustained Pupil Dilation in Response to Emotional Information and Self-Reported Rumination , 2003, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[24]  T. Bollon,et al.  Incidental emotions associated with uncertainty appraisals impair decisions in the Iowa Gambling Task , 2013 .

[25]  Andreas Glöckner,et al.  How Distinct are Intuition and Deliberation? An Eye-Tracking Analysis of Instruction-Induced Decision Modes , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[26]  Andreas Roider,et al.  Cognitive Abilities and Behavioral Biases , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[27]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Iowa Gambling Task (IGT): twenty years after – gambling disorder and IGT , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[28]  Michael P. Milham,et al.  Distinct neural mechanisms of risk and ambiguity: A meta-analysis of decision-making , 2006, NeuroImage.

[29]  Sander Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Pupil Diameter Predicts Changes in the Exploration–Exploitation Trade-off: Evidence for the Adaptive Gain Theory , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  M. Dixon,et al.  Affective guidance in the Iowa gambling task , 2006, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[31]  G. Fricchione.  Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[32]  A. Lawrence,et al.  The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.