Purpose
A better cooperation among all stakeholders working towards enhancing the disaster resilience of societies can only be achieved if the expectations or the needs of each stakeholder are understood. This study attempts to outline the needs of communities affected by disasters for the purpose of aligning the needs and skill requirements with the abilities of built environment professionals serving these communities. Therefore, the study aims to identify and describe community needs and skills requirements for enhancing disaster resilience.
Design/methodology/approach
The study adopted literature review and semi-structured interviews. The semi-structured interviews were conducted with key members of some communities affected by disasters and with some of the professionals who participated in the restoration/reconstruction of those communities. Data obtained were analysed using NVivo 10.
Findings
The study revealed the current and emerging needs and skills of communities related to the built environment professionals from the viewpoint of enhancing disaster resilience. Thus, 29 classifications of skill and needs were derived and classified under five major disaster resilience dimensions to include social, economic, technological, environmental and institutional aspects.
Research limitations/implications
This study focuses only of the needs and skills of the “community”, which is the major stakeholder that is basically the receiver of all that the other stakeholders of disaster resilience have to offer.
Practical implications
This study would help the built environment professionals involved in disaster resilience to become aware of the specific needs and skills of the communities affected by disasters for the purpose of developing their competences.
Originality/value
The study findings would be useful for both the built environment professionals and higher education institutions. Because it is important for professionals to update and upgrade their knowledge towards enhancing their capabilities and meeting stakeholders’ expectations in a bid to enhance societal resilience to disasters across all domains of resilience.
[1]
Lindsey R. Barnes,et al.
A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters
,
2008
.
[2]
Patricia M. Carrillo,et al.
Built‐in resilience to disasters: a pre‐emptive approach
,
2007
.
[3]
A. Hossain.
Community Participation in Disaster Management: Role of Social Work to Enhance Participation
,
2013
.
[4]
K. Sapountzaki.
Social resilience to environmental risks: A mechanism of vulnerability transfer?
,
2007
.
[5]
John T Cacioppo,et al.
Social resilience: the value of social fitness with an application to the military.
,
2011,
The American psychologist.
[6]
Andrew Price,et al.
Integrating disaster risk management into construction: a UK perspective
,
2007
.
[7]
C. S. Holling.
Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems
,
1973
.
[8]
Christopher G. Burton,et al.
The Development of Metrics For Community Resilience to Natural Disasters
,
2012
.
[9]
David Baldry,et al.
Disaster knowledge factors in managing disasters successfully
,
2010
.
[10]
U. Flick.
An Introduction to Qualitative Research
,
1998
.
[11]
U. Sekaran.
Research Methods for Business
,
1999
.
[12]
Bernard Manyena,et al.
Disaster resilience in development and humanitarian interventions
,
2009
.
[13]
D. Alexander.
Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey
,
2013
.