Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation

We review the concepts and research associated with measuring fear and its consequences for foraging. When foraging, animals should and do demand hazardous duty pay. They assess a foraging cost of predation to compensate for the risk of predation or the risk of catastrophic injury. Similarly, in weighing foraging options, animals tradeoff food and safety. The foraging cost of predation can be modelled, and it can be quantitatively and qualitatively measured using risk titrations. Giving-up densities (GUDs) in depletable food patches and the distribution of foragers across safe and risky feeding opportunities are two frequent experimental tools for titrating food and safety. A growing body of literature shows that: (i) the cost of predation can be big and comprise the forager’s largest foraging cost, (ii) seemingly small changes in habitat or microhabitat characteristics can lead to large changes in the cost of predation, and (iii) a forager’s cost of predation rises with risk of mortality, the forager’s energy state and a decrease in its marginal value of energy. In titrating for the cost of predation, researchers have investigated spatial and temporal variation in risk, scale-dependent variation in risk, and the role of predation risk in a forager’s ecology. A risk titration from a feeding animal often provides a more accurate behavioural indicator of predation risk than direct observations of predator-inflicted mortality. Titrating for fear responses in foragers has some well-established applications and holds promise for novel methodologies, concepts and applications. Future directions for expanding conceptual and empirical tools include: what are the consequences of foraging costs arising from interference behaviours and other sources of catastrophic loss? Are there alternative routes by which organisms can respond to tradeoffs of food and safety? What does an animal’s landscape of fear look like as a spatially explicit map, and how do various environmental factors affect it? Behavioural titrations will help to illuminate these issues and more.

[1]  K. Warkentin,et al.  Adaptive plasticity in hatching age: a response to predation risk trade-offs. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  M. V. Price,et al.  Direct Observations of Owls and Heteromyid Rodents: Can Predation Risk Explain Microhabitat Use? , 1991 .

[3]  E. Werner,et al.  Morphological Plasticity in Four Larval Anurans Distributed along an Environmental Gradient , 2000, Copeia.

[4]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Antipredator behavior and the asset-protection principle , 1994 .

[5]  L. Dill,et al.  A DETERMINATION OF THE ENERGETIC EQUIVALENCE OF THE RISK OF PREDATION , 1989 .

[6]  D. Desor,et al.  Influence of environment structure and food availability on the foraging behaviour of the laboratory rat , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[7]  Menna E. Jones,et al.  Structurally complex habitat and sensory adaptations mediate the behavioural responses of a desert rodent to an indirect cue for increased predation risk , 2003 .

[8]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Titrating food and safety in a heterogeneous environment: when are the risky and safe patches of equal value? , 1995 .

[9]  D. Morris Coexistence of Specialist and Generalist Rodents Via Habitat Selection , 1996 .

[10]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Desert rodent community structure : a test of four mechanisms of coexistence , 1989 .

[11]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Patch use predation risk. II : A test with fox squirrels, Sciurus niger , 1992 .

[12]  T. Valone,et al.  Foraging under Multiple Costs: The Importance of Predation, Energetic, and Assessment Error Costs to a Desert Forager , 1999 .

[13]  J. Korb,et al.  Evaluation of predation risk in the collectively foraging termite Macrotermes bellicosus , 2002, Insectes Sociaux.

[14]  A. Houston,et al.  Starvation and Predation as Factors Limiting Population Size , 1987 .

[15]  M. Bowers,et al.  Variation in giving-up densities of foraging chipmunks (Tamias striatus) and squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) , 1993 .

[16]  M. Mangel,et al.  Oviposition habitat selection in response to risk of predation in temporary pools: mode of detection and consistency across experimental venue , 2003, Oecologia.

[17]  Burt P. Kotler Behavioral resource depression and decaying perceived risk of predation in two species of coexisting gerbils , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  Douglas W. Morris,et al.  OPTIMALLY FORAGING MICE MATCH PATCH USE WITH HABITAT DIFFERENCES IN FITNESS , 2000 .

[19]  Tamara C. Grand Foraging‐Predation Risk Trade‐offs, Habitat Selection, and the Coexistence of Competitors , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[20]  V. Gotceitas Foraging and predator avoidance: a test of a patch choice model with juvenile bluegill sunfish , 1990, Oecologia.

[21]  E. T. Segura,et al.  The tale of the screaming hairy armadillo, the guinea pig and the marginal value theorem , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  A. Brodin Mass-dependent predation and metabolic expenditure in wintering birds: is there a trade-off between different forms of predation? , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  G. Singleton,et al.  Predation risk and habitat selection of Australian house mice , Mus domesticus, during an incipient plague: desperate behaviour due to food depletion , 2002 .

[24]  L. Blaustein,et al.  Experimental evidence for predation risk sensitive oviposition by a mosquito, Culiseta longiareolata , 1999 .

[25]  L. Persson,et al.  ADAPTIVE HABITAT USE IN SIZE-STRUCTURED POPULATIONS: LINKING INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR TO POPULATION PROCESSES , 2003 .

[26]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Competition between birds and mammals: A comparison of giving-up densities between crested larks and gerbils , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[27]  K. Risenhoover,et al.  Using artificial food patches to evaluate habitat quality for granivorous birds : An application of foraging theory , 1996 .

[28]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Rates of seed harvest by two species of gerbilline rodents , 1990 .

[29]  T. Dayan,et al.  Differential behavioural and hormonal responses of voles and spiny mice to owl calls , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  R. Relyea THE LASTING EFFECTS OF ADAPTIVE PLASTICITY: PREDATOR‐INDUCED TADPOLES BECOME LONG‐LEGGED FROGS , 2001 .

[31]  Tamara C. Grand,et al.  The energetic equivalence of cover to juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): ideal free distribution theroy applied , 1997 .

[32]  L. Dill,et al.  Fish and game: a game theoretic approach to habitat selection by predators and prey* , 1994 .

[33]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Periodic oscillations in an ideal-free predator-prey distribution. , 1990 .

[34]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Foraging Under Predation - a Comparison of Energetic and Predation Costs in Rodent Communities of the Negev and Sonoran Deserts , 1994 .

[35]  A. Subach,et al.  THE COSTS OF APPREHENSIVE FORAGING , 2002 .

[36]  J. Laundré,et al.  Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the "landscape of fear" in Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A. , 2001 .

[37]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[38]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  The effects of owl predation on the foraging behavior of heteromyid rodents , 1988, Oecologia.

[39]  S. L. Lima Vigilance during the Initiation of Daily Feeding in Dark-Eyed Juncos , 1988 .

[40]  John C. Wingfield,et al.  ECOLOGICAL BASES OF HORMONE-BEHAVIOR INTERACTIONS : THE EMERGENCY LIFE HISTORY STAGE , 1998 .

[41]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: Foraging under predation risk , 1999 .

[42]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Factors Affecting Gerbil Foraging Behavior and Rates of Owl Predation , 1991 .

[43]  M. Rosenzweig Habitat Selection Experiments with a Pair of Coexisting Heteromyid Rodent Species , 1973 .

[44]  L. Persson,et al.  Size- and density-dependent habitat use in predators: consequences for habitat shifts in young fish , 2003 .

[45]  Patch use in the pygmy rock mouse (Petromyscus collinus) , 1998 .

[46]  S. A. Temple Do Predators Always Capture Substandard Individuals Disproportionately From Prey Populations , 1987 .

[47]  Burt P. Kotler Owl Predation on Desert Rodents Which Differ in Morphology and Behavior , 1985 .

[48]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Attention, 'apprehension' and gerbils searching in patches , 2001 .

[49]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Long- and short-term state-dependent foraging under predation risk: an indication of habitat quality , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  C. Clark,et al.  DOMINANT AND SUBORDINATE FATTENING STRATEGIES - A DYNAMIC GAME , 1995 .

[51]  A Sih,et al.  Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands? , 1980, Science.

[52]  Tamara C. Grand,et al.  Predation risk, unequal competitors and the ideal free distribution , 1999 .

[53]  D. Ward,et al.  Effects of Substrate on Foraging Decisions by a Namib Desert Gerbil , 1995 .

[54]  J. Gutiérrez,et al.  SMALL‐MAMMAL FORAGING BEHAVIOR: MECHANISMS FOR COEXISTENCE AND IMPLICATION FOR POPULATION DYNAMICS , 2002 .

[55]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Back to the basics of anti-predatory vigilance: the group-size effect , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[56]  A. Houston,et al.  The value of fat reserves and the tradeoff between starvation and predation , 1990, Acta biotheoretica.

[57]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  APPREHENSION AND TIME ALLOCATION IN GERBILS: THE EFFECTS OF PREDATORY RISK AND ENERGETIC STATE , 2004 .

[58]  J. Cockrem,et al.  Sight of a predator can stimulate a corticosterone response in the great tit (Parus major). , 2002, General and comparative endocrinology.

[59]  Michael M. Delm Vigilance for predators: detection and dilution effects , 1990, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[60]  Alice Eastlake Chew,et al.  Energy Relationships of the Mammals of a Desert Shrub (Larrea tridentata) Community , 1970 .

[61]  Menna E. Jones,et al.  COEXISTENCE OF TEMPORALLY PARTITIONED SPINY MICE: ROLES OF HABITAT STRUCTURE AND FORAGING BEHAVIOR , 2001 .

[62]  M. Mangel,et al.  Predation‐dependent oviposition habitat selection by the mosquito Culiseta longiareolata: a test of competing hypotheses , 2002 .

[63]  Lawrence M. Dill,et al.  MORTALITY RISK VS. FOOD QUALITY TRADE-OFFS IN A COMMON CURRENCY: ANT PATCH PREFERENCES' , 1990 .

[64]  D. R. Cornelius Seed Production of Native Grasses under Cultivation in Eastern Kansas , 1950 .

[65]  Menna E. Jones,et al.  Foraging Behavior and Microhabitat Use by Spiny Mice, Acomys cahirinus and A. russatus, in the Presence of Blanford's Fox (Vulpes cana) Odor , 2000, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[66]  Dag L. Aksnes,et al.  Food, predation risk and shelter: an experimental study on the distribution of adult two-spotted goby Gobiusculus flavescens (Fabricius) , 1993 .

[67]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Effects of foraging behavior and spatial scale on diet selectivity: A test with fox squirrels , 1995 .

[68]  S. L. Lima Stress and Decision Making under the Risk of Predation: Recent Developments from Behavioral, Reproductive, and Ecological Perspectives , 1998 .

[69]  S. Holbrook,et al.  THE COMBINED EFFECTS OF PREDATION RISK AND FOOD REWARD ON PATCH SELECTION , 1988 .

[70]  J. F. Gilliam,et al.  Resource Depletion and Habitat Segregation by Competitors Under Predation Hazard , 1988 .

[71]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Microhabitat use, giving-up densities and temporal activity as short- and long-term anti-predator behaviors in common voles , 2000 .

[72]  Foraging in Heteromyid Rodents: The Energy Costs of Scratch-Digging , 1992 .

[73]  J. F. Gilliam,et al.  Feeding under predation hazard: response of the guppy and Hart's rivulus from sites with contrasting predation hazard , 1987, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[74]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  Mammalian predator scent, vegetation cover and tree seedling predation by meadow voles , 2002 .

[75]  M. Sabelis,et al.  Nonequilibrium Population Dynamics of “Ideal and Free” Prey and Predators , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[76]  A. Houston,et al.  General results concerning the trade-off between gaining energy and avoiding predation , 1993 .

[77]  M. V. Price,et al.  Depletion of seed patches by Merriam’s kangaroo rats: are GUD assumptions met? , 2001 .

[78]  Ola Olsson,et al.  Gain curves in depletable food patches: A test of five models with European starlings , 2001 .

[79]  J. S. Brown,et al.  Patch use under predation risks. I : Models and predictions , 1992 .

[80]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Testing values of crested porcupine habitats by experimental food patches , 1990, Oecologia.

[81]  Measuring the risk of predation in an energy currency: field experiments with foraging blue tits, Parus caeruleus , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[82]  R. Altwegg Trait-mediated indirect effects and complex life-cycles in two European frogs , 2002 .

[83]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  The Effect of a Change in Foraging Options on Intake Rate and Predation Rate , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[84]  H. Leirs,et al.  Foraging of multimammate mice, Mastomys natalensis, under different predation pressure: cover, patch-dependent decisions and density-dependent GUDs , 2003 .

[85]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  GIVING-UP DENSITIES AND HABITAT PREFERENCES OF EUROPEAN STARLINGS AND AMERICAN ROBINS , 2003 .

[86]  O. Reichman,et al.  Distribution of Seeds in Sonoran Desert Soils: Implications for Heteromyid Rodent Foraging. , 1987, Ecology.

[87]  S. L. Lima Initiation and termination of daily feeding in dark-eyed juncos: influences of predation risk and energy reserves , 1988 .

[88]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[89]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Temporal Variation in Danger Drives Antipredator Behavior: The Predation Risk Allocation Hypothesis , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[90]  A. Houston,et al.  Ideal free distributions under predation risk , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[91]  R. Vásquez Assessment of predation risk via illumination level: facultative central place foraging in the cricetid rodent Phyllotis darwini , 1994, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[92]  G. Poppy,et al.  Induction and Systemic Release of Herbivore-Induced Plant Volatiles Mediating In-Flight Orientation of Aphidius ervi , 1999, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[93]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  The influence of snakes on the foraging behavior of gerbils , 1993 .

[94]  A. Houston,et al.  Evolutionarily stable levels of vigilance as a function of group size , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[95]  A. Bouskila,et al.  Interactions Between Predation Risk and Competition: A Field Study of Kangaroo Rats and Snakes , 1995 .

[96]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  ASSESSING EFFECTS OF PREDATION RISK ON FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF MULE DEER , 2001 .

[97]  D. Morris Habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure , 1988, Evolutionary Ecology.

[98]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  A Theory of Habitat Selection , 1981 .

[99]  Burt P. Kotler The effects of morphology and body size on rates of owl predation on desert rodents. , 1988 .

[100]  W. Cresswell,et al.  Flocking is an effective anti-predation strategy in redshanks, Tringa totanus , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[101]  Jane E. Norman,et al.  Direct and indirect cues of predatory risk and patch use by fox squirrels and thirteen-lined ground squirrels , 1998 .

[102]  J. Pusenius,et al.  The effects of habitat manipulation on population distribution and foraging behavior in meadow voles , 2002 .

[103]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[104]  J. F. Gilliam,et al.  Habitat Selection Under Predation Hazard: Test of a Model with Foraging Minnows. , 1987, Ecology.

[105]  E. Werner,et al.  Behavioral and Life‐Historical Responses of Larval American Toads to an Odonate Predator , 1990 .

[106]  R. Svanbäck,et al.  Morphology dependent foraging efficiency in perch: a trade-off for ecological specialization? , 2003 .

[107]  T. Dayan,et al.  On the Use of the Time Axis for Ecological Separation: Diel Rhythms as an Evolutionary Constraint , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[108]  Ola Olsson,et al.  The survival-rate-maximizing policy for Bayesian foragers: wait for good news , 1998 .

[109]  T. Valone,et al.  The effect of mammalian predator scent on the foraging behavior of Dipodomys merriami , 2000 .

[110]  D. Morris Optimally Foraging Deer Mice in Prairie Mosaics: A Test of Habitat Theory and Absence of Landscape Effects , 1997 .

[111]  Burt P. Kotler Patch use by gerbils in a risky environment: manipulating food and safety to test four models , 1997 .

[112]  G. Bachman The effect of body condition on the trade-off between vigilance and foraging in Belding's ground squirrels , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[113]  W. Calder Size, Function, and Life History , 1988 .

[114]  Ola Olsson,et al.  Gaining ecological information about Bayesian foragers through their behaviour. II. A field test with woodpeckers , 1999 .

[115]  George V. N. Powell,et al.  Experimental analysis of the social value of flocking by starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in relation to predation and foraging , 1974 .

[116]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Foraging games between gerbils and their predators: temporal dynamics of resource depletion and apprehension in gerbils , 2002 .

[117]  S. Fretwell Populations in a seasonal environment. , 1973, Monographs in population biology.