Root clumping may affect the root water potential and the resistance to soil-root water transport

We have appraised for clumped root systems the widely-accepted view that the resistance to water flux from soil to roots (‘soil resistance’) is low under most field conditions, so that root water potential would closely follow the mean soil water potential. Three root spatial arrangements were studied, simulating either the regular pattern generally assumed in models, or two degrees of root clumping frequently observed in the field. We used a numerical 2-dimensional model of water transfer which assumes a control of evapotranspiration by root signalling. Calculations were carried out at two evaporative demands and for two contrasting soil hydraulic properties. The rate of soil depletion, the timing of the reduction in evapotranspiration and the difference between root water potential and mean soil water potential were all affected by the root spatial arrangement, with a greater effect at high evaporative demand and low soil hydraulic conductivity. Almost all the soil water reserve was available to plants without reduction in evapotranspiration in the regular case, while only a part of it was available in clumped cases. In the regular case, calculated ‘soil resistances’ were similar to those calculated using Newman's (1969) method. Conversely they were higher by up to two orders of magnitude in clumped root spatial arrangements. These results place doubt on the generality of the view that ‘soil resistance’ is low under common field conditions. They are consistent with the results of field experiments, especially with recent data dealing with root-to-shoot communication.

[1]  C. Dirksen,et al.  Water uptake and release by alfalfa roots , 1985 .

[2]  W. E. Blizzard.  Comparative resistance of the soil and the plant to water transport. , 1980, Plant physiology.

[3]  J. Baker,et al.  Water Transfer through Cotton Plants Connecting Soil Regions of Differing Water Potential , 1988 .

[4]  R. R. Allmaras,et al.  Maize and soybean root clustering as indicated by root mapping , 1991, Plant and Soil.

[5]  François Tardieu,et al.  Caractérisation en tant que capteur d'eau de l'enracinement du maïs en parcelle cultivée. II. - Une méthode d'étude de la répartition verticale et horizontale des racines , 1986 .

[6]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  Roots, plant production and nutrient use efficiency , 1987 .

[7]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Plant response to the soil water reserve: Consequences of the root system environment , 1991, Irrigation Science.

[8]  W. R. Gardner.  DYNAMIC ASPECTS OF WATER AVAILABILITY TO PLANTS , 1960 .

[9]  François Tardieu,et al.  Modeling Root Water Potential and Soil‐Root Water Transport: II. Field Comparisons , 1991 .

[10]  D. Reicosky,et al.  Relative Importance of Soil Resistance and Plant Resistance in Root Water Absorption , 1976 .

[11]  K. Barley.  The Configuration of the Root System in Relation to Nutrient Uptake , 1970 .

[12]  E. Newman,et al.  RESISTANCE TO WATER FLOW IN SOIL AND PLANT , 1969 .

[13]  O. Bethenod,et al.  Xylem ABA controls the stomatal conductance of field‐grown maize subjected to soil compaction or soil drying , 1992 .

[14]  E. Newman.  RESISTANCE TO WATER FLOW IN SOIL AND PLANT I. SOIL RESISTANCE IN RELATION TO AMOUNTS OF ROOT: THEORETICAL , 1969 .

[15]  E. Newman.  Resistance to Water Flow in Soil and Plant. II. A Review of Experimental Evidence on the Rhizosphere Resistance , 1969 .

[16]  D. Clarkson,et al.  Rectification of radial water flow in the hypodermis of nodal roots of Zea mays , 1988 .

[17]  L. Aylmore,et al.  Non-uniform soil water extaction by plant roots , 2005, Plant and Soil.

[18]  P. Nobel,et al.  Rectifier-like Activities of Roots of Two Desert Succulents , 1984 .

[19]  François Tardieu,et al.  Modeling root water potential and soil-root water transport. I. Model presentation , 1991 .

[20]  P. Tinker,et al.  Uptake of solutes by multiple root systems from soil , 1973, Plant and Soil.

[21]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  Abscisic acid produced in dehydrating roots may enable the plant to measure the water status of the soil , 1989 .

[22]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Analysis of the spatial variability of maize root density , 1988, Plant and Soil.

[23]  James W. Jones,et al.  Total Resistance to Water Flow in Field Soybeans: II. Limiting Soil Moisture1 , 1982 .

[24]  H. Rowse,et al.  Axial Resistance to Water Movement in Broad Bean (Vicia faba) Roots , 1981 .

[25]  William J. Davies,et al.  Root Signals and the Regulation of Growth and Development of Plants in Drying Soil , 1991 .

[26]  O. Bethenod,et al.  Maize stomatal conductance in the field: its relationship with soil and plant water potentials, mechanical constraints and ABA concentration in the xylem sap , 1991 .

[27]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  What information is conveyed by an ABA signal from maize roots in drying field soil , 1992 .

[28]  D. Hillel,et al.  A MICROSCOPIC‐SCALE MODEL OF SOIL WATER UPTAKE AND SALT MOVEMENT TO PLANT ROOTS , 1975 .

[29]  P. B. Tinker,et al.  Uptake of solutes by multiple root systems from soil , 1971, Plant and Soil.

[30]  J. Passioura.  Roots and Water Economy of Wheat , 1985 .

[31]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Caractérisation en tant que capteur d'eau de l'enracinement du maïs en parcelle cultivée. I: Discussion des critères d'étude , 1986 .

[32]  R. H. Shaw,et al.  Availability of Soil Water to Plants as Affected by Soil Moisture Content and Meteorological Conditions1 , 1962 .

[33]  F. Tardieu.  Analysis of the spatial variability in maize root density , 1988, Plant and Soil.

[34]  A. Hall,et al.  Stomatal closure with soil water depletion not associated with changes in Bulk leaf water status , 1981, Oecologia.

[35]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Analysis of the spatial variability of maize root density , 1988, Plant and Soil.

[36]  J. Passioura,et al.  Water Transport in and to Roots , 1988 .

[37]  R. Munns,et al.  Soil water status affects the stomatal conductance of fully turgid wheat and sunflower leaves , 1986 .

[38]  P. B. Tinker,et al.  Uptake of solutes by multiple root systems from soil , 1972, Plant and Soil.