Photon information efficient communication through atmospheric turbulence

High photon-efficiency (many bits/photon) optical communication is possible with pulse-position modulation and direct detection, and high spectral efficiency (many bits/sec-Hz) optical communication is possible with quadrature-amplitude modulation and coherent detection. These high efficiencies, however, cannot be achieved simultaneously unless multiple spatial modes are employed. Previous work for the vacuum-propagation channel has shown that achieving 10 bits/photon and 5 bits/sec-Hz is impossible with coherent detection, and it requires 189 low diffraction-loss spatial modes at the ultimate Holevo limit, and 4500 such modes at the Shannon limit for on-off keying with direct detection. For terrestrial propagation paths, however, the effects of atmospheric turbulence must be factored into the photon and spectral efficiency assessments. This paper accomplishes that goal by presenting upper and lower bounds on the turbulent channel’s ergodic Holevo capacity for M-mode systems whose transmitters use either focused-beam, Hermite-Gaussian (HG), or Laguerre-Gaussian (LG) modes, and whose receivers do M-mode detection either with or without adaptive optics. The bounds show that use of adaptive optics will not be necessary for achieving high photon efficiency and high spectral efficiency through atmospheric turbulence, although receivers which do not use adaptive optics will need to cope with considerable crosstalk between the spatial patterns produced in their entrance pupils by the M-mode transmitter. The bounds also show the exact theoretical equivalence of the HG and LG mode sets for this application, generalizing a result previously established for the vacuum-propagation channel. Finally, our results show that the FB modes outperform the HG and LG modes in operation with and without adaptive optics.

[1]  Akira Ishimaru,et al.  Wave propagation and scattering in random media , 1997 .

[2]  D. R. Wisely,et al.  Optical wireless: the story so far , 1998, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[3]  J H Shapiro,et al.  Normal-mode approach to wave propagation in the turbulent atmosphere. , 1974, Applied optics.

[4]  R. S. Kennedy Communication through optical scattering channels: An introduction , 1970 .

[5]  Debbie Kedar,et al.  Urban optical wireless communication networks: the main challenges and possible solutions , 2004, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  R. Boyd,et al.  Influence of atmospheric turbulence on optical communications using orbital angular momentum for encoding. , 2012, Optics Express.

[7]  M. Neifeld,et al.  Turbulence-induced channel crosstalk in an orbital angular momentum-multiplexed free-space optical link. , 2008, Applied optics.

[8]  Bryan S. Robinson,et al.  Overview and status of the Lunar Laser Communications Demonstration , 2012, Other Conferences.

[9]  C. K. Rushforth,et al.  Restoration, Resolution, and Noise , 1968 .

[10]  Guifang Li Recent advances in coherent optical communication , 2009 .

[11]  Saikat Guha,et al.  Ultimate channel capacity of free-space optical communications (Invited) , 2005 .

[12]  A. Saleh,et al.  9.4 - An investigation of laser wave depolarization due to atmospheric transmission , 1967 .

[13]  G. Toraldo di Francia Degrees of freedom of an image. , 1969, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[14]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Classical capacity of the lossy bosonic channel: the exact solution. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[15]  D. Slepian Prolate spheroidal wave functions, Fourier analysis and uncertainty — IV: Extensions to many dimensions; generalized prolate spheroidal functions , 1964 .

[16]  René-Jean Essiambre,et al.  Capacity Trends and Limits of Optical Communication Networks , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[17]  J. H. Shapiro Imaging and optical communication through atmospheric turbulence , 1978 .

[18]  Dariush Divsalar,et al.  The ultimate limits of optical communication efficiency with photon-counting receivers , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings.

[19]  J. H. Shapiro,et al.  Turbulence-induced crosstalk in multiple-spatial-mode optical communication , 2012, 2012 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[20]  Saikat Guha,et al.  On quantum limit of optical communications: Concatenated codes and joint-detection receivers , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings.

[21]  C. Paterson,et al.  Atmospheric turbulence and orbital angular momentum of single photons for optical communication. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[22]  Jeffrey H. Shapiro,et al.  Performance analysis for near-field atmospheric optical communications , 2004, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2004. GLOBECOM '04..

[23]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Explicit capacity-achieving receivers for optical communication and quantum reading , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings.

[24]  O. R. Spivack,et al.  Wave Propagation and Scattering - 12 lectures , 2012 .

[25]  D. Slepian Analytic Solution of Two Apodization Problems , 1965 .

[26]  Mark L Stevens,et al.  781 Mbit/s photon-counting optical communications using a superconducting nanowire detector. , 2006, Optics letters.

[27]  Jeffrey H. Shapiro,et al.  Near-field turbulence effects on quantum-key distribution , 2003 .

[28]  L. Andrews,et al.  Laser Beam Propagation Through Random Media , 1998 .