Evolutionary events in a mathematical sciences research collaboration network

This study examines long-term trends and shifting behavior in the collaboration network of mathematics literature, using a subset of data from Mathematical Reviews spanning 1985–2009. Rather than modeling the network cumulatively, this study traces the evolution of the “here and now” using fixed-duration sliding windows. The analysis uses a suite of common network diagnostics, including the distributions of degrees, distances, and clustering, to track network structure. Several random models that call these diagnostics as parameters help tease them apart as factors from the values of others. Some behaviors are consistent over the entire interval, but most diagnostics indicate that the network’s structural evolution is dominated by occasional dramatic shifts in otherwise steady trends. These behaviors are not distributed evenly across the network; stark differences in evolution can be observed between two major subnetworks, loosely thought of as “pure” and “applied”, which approximately partition the aggregate. The paper characterizes two major events along the mathematics network trajectory and discusses possible explanatory factors.

[1]  Liang Gao,et al.  Network of Econophysicists: a weighted network to investigate the development of Econophysics , 2004 .

[2]  D. Price,et al.  Little Science, Big Science and Beyond , 1986 .

[3]  Garry Robins,et al.  Small Worlds Among Interlocking Directors: Network Structure and Distance in Bipartite Graphs , 2004, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[4]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Mapping Change in Large Networks , 2008, PloS one.

[5]  Gueorgi Kossinets,et al.  Empirical Analysis of an Evolving Social Network , 2006, Science.

[6]  Ping-Nan Hsiao,et al.  A Social Network Model Based on Caveman Network , 2006, 2006 First International Conference on Communications and Networking in China.

[7]  Peter Grindrod,et al.  A Matrix Iteration for Dynamic Network Summaries , 2013, SIAM Rev..

[8]  M. Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Otto Neugebauer Ralph Boas.  Chinese Acrobatics , an Old-Time Brewery , and the “ Much Needed Gap ” : The Life of Mathematical Reviews , 2022 .

[10]  M. Newman,et al.  Why social networks are different from other types of networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  J. Davis.  CHAPTER 4 – THE DAVIS/HOLLAND/LEINHARDT STUDIES: AN OVERVIEW1 , 1979 .

[12]  V. Blondel,et al.  Distance distribution in random graphs and application to network exploration. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  F. W. Lancaster,et al.  Types and Levels of Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Masoud Asgharian,et al.  Change-point Problem and Regression: An Annotated Bibliography , 2008 .

[15]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[16]  Z. Di,et al.  Clustering coefficient and community structure of bipartite networks , 2007, 0710.0117.

[17]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  Average Distance, Diameter, and Clustering in Social Networks with Homophily , 2008, WINE.

[18]  Martin Suter,et al.  Small World , 2002 .

[19]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[20]  P. Erdos,et al.  The Giant Component : The Golden Anniversary , 2009 .

[21]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Networks with the Smallest Average Distance and the Largest Average Clustering , 2010, 1007.4031.

[22]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies , 2004, Scientometrics.

[23]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Temporal Networks , 2011, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[24]  G. Borjas,et al.  The Collapse of the Soviet Union and the Productivity of American Mathematicians , 2012, World Scientific Studies in International Economics.

[25]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[26]  M. Tomassini,et al.  Empirical analysis of the evolution of a scientific collaboration network , 2007 .

[27]  J. Moody.  The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999 , 2004 .

[28]  Kirk Doran,et al.  The Collapse of the Soviet Union and the Productivity of American Mathematicians , 2012 .

[29]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[30]  M. Weigt,et al.  On the properties of small-world network models , 1999, cond-mat/9903411.

[31]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[32]  Ping-Nan Hsiao,et al.  A Social Network Model Based on Topology Vision , 2009, Complex.

[33]  Walter Willinger,et al.  Towards a Theory of Scale-Free Graphs: Definition, Properties, and Implications , 2005, Internet Math..

[34]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  H E Stanley,et al.  Classes of small-world networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Paul Ginsparg.  The global village pioneers , 2009, Learn. Publ..

[37]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[38]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[39]  Jerrold W. Grossman,et al.  A portion of the well-known collaboration graph , 1995 .

[40]  Jerrold W. Grossman,et al.  The evolution of the mathematical research collaboration graph , 2002 .

[41]  Juan A. Almendral,et al.  The network of scientific collaborations within the European framework programme , 2007, 0901.3375.

[42]  Tore Opsahl.  Triadic closure in two-mode networks: Redefining the global and local clustering coefficients , 2013, Soc. Networks.

[43]  John Skvoretz,et al.  Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[44]  Ping-Nan Hsiao,et al.  Node Degree Sequence Preserving and Controlling S-metric , 2007, The 9th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology.

[45]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[46]  R. Tsien,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2022 .

[47]  Agata Fronczak,et al.  Average path length in random networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[48]  A. Vázquez,et al.  Network clustering coefficient without degree-correlation biases. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[49]  S. Goyal,et al.  Economics: An Emerging Small World , 2004, Journal of Political Economy.

[50]  Peder Olesen Larsen,et al.  The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index , 2010, Scientometrics.

[51]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[52]  E. S. Page.  CONTINUOUS INSPECTION SCHEMES , 1954 .

[53]  M E Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[54]  B. Bollobás.  The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[55]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[56]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  M. Newman.  1 Who is the best connected scientist ? A study of scientific coauthorship networks , 2004 .

[58]  Gary G Yen,et al.  Group-based Yule model for bipartite author-paper networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[59]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Bipartite structure of all complex networks , 2004, Inf. Process. Lett..

[60]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Growth and structure of Slovenia's scientific collaboration network , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[61]  Samuel Leinhardt,et al.  Perspectives on social network research , 1980 .

[62]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[63]  Bruce A. Reed,et al.  The Size of the Giant Component of a Random Graph with a Given Degree Sequence , 1998, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing.

[64]  F. Chung,et al.  The average distances in random graphs with given expected degrees , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  A. Rbnyi.  ON THE EVOLUTION OF RANDOM GRAPHS , 2001 .

[66]  Lun Li,et al.  Topologies of Complex Networks: Functions and Structures , 2007 .

[67]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[68]  D. Price.  Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .

[69]  Suzanne Bakken,et al.  Defining interdisciplinary research: conclusions from a critical review of the literature. , 2007, Health services research.

[70]  William E. Odom.  Report of the Senior Assessment Panel for the International Assessment of the U , 1998 .

[71]  Bruce A. Reed,et al.  A Critical Point for Random Graphs with a Given Degree Sequence , 1995, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[72]  M. Newman.  Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[73]  W. Glänzel,et al.  Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship , 2004 .

[74]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Coauthorship Patterns and Trends in the Sciences (1980-1998): A Bibliometric Study With Implications for Database Indexing and Search Strategies , 2002, Libr. Trends.

[75]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research , 2005 .

[76]  Kenneth R. Hess,et al.  Collection of Biostatistics Research Archive , 2009 .

[77]  Brian Cloteaux,et al.  Measuring the effectiveness of the s-metric to produce better network models , 2008, 2008 Winter Simulation Conference.

[78]  M. Newman,et al.  Mixing patterns in networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[79]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[80]  M. Newman,et al.  Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[81]  M. Newman.  Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[82]  A. Porter,et al.  Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture , 2006 .