The intrinsic memorability of face photographs.

The faces we encounter throughout our lives make different impressions on us: Some are remembered at first glance, while others are forgotten. Previous work has found that the distinctiveness of a face influences its memorability--the degree to which face images are remembered or forgotten. Here, we generalize the concept of face memorability in a large-scale memory study. First, we find that memorability is an intrinsic feature of a face photograph--across observers some faces are consistently more remembered or forgotten than others--indicating that memorability can be used for measuring, predicting, and manipulating subsequent memories. Second, we determine the role that 20 personality, social, and memory-related traits play in face memorability. Whereas we find that certain traits (such as kindness, atypicality, and trustworthiness) contribute to face memorability, they do not suffice to explain the variance in memorability scores, even when accounting for noise and differences in subjective experience. This suggests that memorability itself is a consistent, singular measure of a face that cannot be reduced to a simple combination of personality and social facial attributes. We outline modern neuroscience questions that can be explored through the lens of memorability.

[1]  W. Scoville,et al.  LOSS OF RECENT MEMORY AFTER BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESIONS , 1957, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[2]  P. S. Vivekananthan,et al.  A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  L. Standing Learning 10000 pictures , 1973 .

[4]  L. Standing Learning 10,000 pictures. , 1973, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  E. Foa,et al.  Societal Structures of the Mind , 1974 .

[6]  S Hollander,et al.  Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[7]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Typicality and familiarity of faces , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[8]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[9]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[10]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Item effects in recognition and fragment completion: Contingency relations vary for different subsets of words. , 1990 .

[11]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  T. Valentine The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[13]  M. Cunningham,et al.  Article Commentary: Averaged Faces Are Attractive, but Very Attractive Faces Are Not Average , 1991 .

[14]  L. Squire,et al.  The medial temporal lobe memory system , 1991, Science.

[15]  L. Squire Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. , 1992, Psychological review.

[16]  J. R. Vokey,et al.  Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[17]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[18]  V. Bruce,et al.  What's Distinctive about a Distinctive Face? , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  James L. McGaugh,et al.  The amygdala and emotional memory , 1995, Nature.

[20]  A. Young,et al.  Face processing impairments after amygdalotomy. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  T. Valentine,et al.  An Investigation of the Contact Hypothesis of the Own-race Bias in Face Recognition , 1995 .

[22]  R. Knight Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection , 1996, Nature.

[23]  Josh H. McDermott,et al.  Functional imaging of human visual recognition. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[25]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Familiarity, Target Set and False Positives in Face Recognition , 1997 .

[26]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[27]  Malcolm W. Brown,et al.  Different Contributions of the Hippocampus and Perirhinal Cortex to Recognition Memory , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  T. Busey Formal models of familiarity and memorability in face recognition , 1999 .

[30]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[31]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[32]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  The face typicality-recognizability relationship: Encoding or retrieval locus? , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[33]  B. Richmond,et al.  Role of perirhinal cortex in object perception, memory, and associations , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[34]  D. Ariely,et al.  Beautiful Faces Have Variable Reward Value fMRI and Behavioral Evidence , 2001, Neuron.

[35]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[36]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[37]  Joan Y. Chiao,et al.  Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  A. Burton,et al.  Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[39]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  T. Shallice,et al.  Face repetition effects in implicit and explicit memory tests as measured by fMRI. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  B. Monin The warm glow heuristic: when liking leads to familiarity. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Familiarity enhances invariance of face representations in human ventral visual cortex: fMRI evidence , 2005, NeuroImage.

[44]  B. Fredrickson,et al.  “We All Look the Same to Me” , 2005, Psychological science.

[45]  David A. Butz,et al.  Memory for own- and other-race faces: A dual-process approach , 2005 .

[46]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  J. Townsend,et al.  Computational, Geometric, and Process Perspectives on Facial Cognition : Contexts and Challenges , 2005 .

[48]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Prosopagnosia as an impairment to face-specific mechanisms: Elimination of the alternative hypotheses in a developmental case , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[49]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Activation of Preexisting and Acquired Face Representations: The N250 Event-related Potential as an Index of Face Familiarity , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  David Gaffan,et al.  Perirhinal cortical contributions to object perception , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  L. Saksida,et al.  Memory, perception, and the ventral visual‐perirhinal‐hippocampal stream: Thinking outside of the boxes , 2007, Hippocampus.

[53]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  C. Price,et al.  Perirhinal Contributions to Human Visual Perception , 2007, Current Biology.

[55]  G. Dawson,et al.  Increased amygdala activation to neutral faces is associated with better face memory performance , 2007, Neuroreport.

[56]  S. Vogt,et al.  Long-term memory for 400 pictures on a common theme. , 2007, Experimental psychology.

[57]  A. Todorov,et al.  The functional basis of face evaluation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Yael Shrager,et al.  Activity in Both Hippocampus and Perirhinal Cortex Predicts the Memory Strength of Subsequently Remembered Information , 2008, Neuron.

[60]  L. Davachi,et al.  Category‐specificity in the human medial temporal lobe cortex , 2009, Hippocampus.

[61]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Conceptual Distinctiveness Supports Detailed Visual Long-term Memory for Real-world Objects the Fidelity of Long-term Memory for Visual Information , 2022 .

[62]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Scene Memory Is More Detailed Than You Think : The Role of Categories in Visual Long-Term Memory , 2010 .

[63]  W. Hockley,et al.  Item Effects in Recognition Memory for Words. , 2010 .

[64]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  High-resolution fMRI of Content-sensitive Subsequent Memory Responses in Human Medial Temporal Lobe , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[65]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Understanding the Intrinsic Memorability of Images , 2011, NIPS.

[66]  Guillén Fernández,et al.  Subjective Sense of Memory Strength and the Objective Amount of Information Accurately Remembered Are Related to Distinct Neural Correlates at Encoding , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[67]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  Evaluating faces on social dimensions. , 2011 .

[68]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Social neuroscience : toward understanding the underpinnings of the social mind , 2011 .

[69]  Jianxiong Xiao,et al.  What makes an image memorable? , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[70]  B. Staresina,et al.  Perirhinal and Parahippocampal Cortices Differentially Contribute to Later Recollection of Object- and Scene-Related Event Details , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[71]  Andy C. H. Lee,et al.  The hippocampus and visual perception , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[72]  Nicholas O. Rule,et al.  A memory advantage for untrustworthy faces , 2012, Cognition.

[73]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Decoding Representations of Scenes in the Medial Temporal Lobes , 2011, Hippocampus.

[74]  A. Oliva,et al.  A Real-World Size Organization of Object Responses in Occipitotemporal Cortex , 2012, Neuron.

[75]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Establishing a Database for Studying Human Face Photograph Memory , 2012, CogSci.

[76]  Wilma A. Bainbridge,et al.  What makes a picture memorable , 2013 .

[77]  Valerie A. Carr,et al.  Global Similarity and Pattern Separation in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe Predict Subsequent Memory , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[78]  Jackson C Liang,et al.  Content representation in the human medial temporal lobe. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[79]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  The Occipital Place Area Is Causally and Selectively Involved in Scene Perception , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[80]  Jianxiong Xiao,et al.  What Makes a Photograph Memorable? , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.