Searching for people to follow in social networks

With the development of social networks, more and more users have a great need to search for people to follow (SPTF) to receive their tweets. According to our experiments, approximately 50% of social networks' lost users leave due to a lack of people to follow. In this paper, we define the problem of SPTF and propose an approach to give users tags and then deliver a ranked list of valuable accounts for them to follow. In the proposed approach, we first seek accounts related to keywords via expanding and predicting tags for users. Second, we propose two algorithms to rank relevant accounts: the first mines the forwarded relationship, and the second incorporates the following relationship into PageRank. Accordingly, we have built a search system that to date, has received more than 1.7 million queries from 0.2 million users. To evaluate the proposed approach, we created a crowd-sourcing organization and crawled 0.25 billion profiles, 15 billion messages and 20 billion links representing following relationships on Sina Microblog. The empirical study validates the effectiveness of our algorithms for expanding and predicting tags compared to the baseline. From query logs, we discover that hot queries include keywords related to academics, occupations and companies. Experiments on those queries show that PageRank-like algorithms perform best for occupation-related queries, forward-relationship-like algorithms work best for academic-related queries and domain-related headcount algorithms work best for company-related queries.

[1]  Fang Wu,et al.  Social Networks that Matter: Twitter Under the Microscope , 2008, First Monday.

[2]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[3]  Craig MacDonald,et al.  Voting for candidates: adapting data fusion techniques for an expert search task , 2006, CIKM '06.

[4]  Gerhard Weikum,et al.  Efficient top-k querying over social-tagging networks , 2008, SIGIR '08.

[5]  Mary Anne Kennan,et al.  The State of the Nation: A Snapshot of Australian Institutional Repositories , 2009, First Monday.

[6]  H. White,et al.  “Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[7]  ChengXiang Zhai,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Expert Finding , 2007, ECIR.

[8]  Ricardo Baeza-Yates,et al.  High Correlation between Incoming and Outgoing Activity: A Distinctive Property of Online Social Networks? , 2011, ICWSM.

[9]  Yong Yu,et al.  Optimizing web search using social annotations , 2007, WWW '07.

[10]  M. de Rijke,et al.  Expertise Retrieval , 2012, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[11]  Adam Rae,et al.  Improving tag recommendation using social networks , 2010, RIAO.

[12]  Maarten de Rijke,et al.  Non-local evidence for expert finding , 2008, CIKM '08.

[13]  Jimeng Sun,et al.  Social influence analysis in large-scale networks , 2009, KDD.

[14]  Jimmy J. Lin,et al.  WTF: the who to follow service at Twitter , 2013, WWW.

[15]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques , 2002, TOIS.

[16]  David Liben-Nowell,et al.  The link-prediction problem for social networks , 2007 .

[17]  Shlomo Moran,et al.  SALSA: the stochastic approach for link-structure analysis , 2001, TOIS.

[18]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[19]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment , 1999, SODA '98.

[20]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  Combating Web Spam with TrustRank , 2004, VLDB.

[21]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  EOS: expertise oriented search using social networks , 2007, WWW '07.

[22]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Cognos: crowdsourcing search for topic experts in microblogs , 2012, SIGIR '12.

[23]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.