Medical Student and Tutor Perceptions of Video Versus Text in an Interactive Online Virtual Patient for Problem-Based Learning: A Pilot Study

Background The impact of the use of video resources in primarily paper-based problem-based learning (PBL) settings has been widely explored. Although it can provide many benefits, the use of video can also hamper the critical thinking of learners in contexts where learners are developing clinical reasoning. However, the use of video has not been explored in the context of interactive virtual patients for PBL. Objective A pilot study was conducted to explore how undergraduate medical students interpreted and evaluated information from video- and text-based materials presented in the context of a branched interactive online virtual patient designed for PBL. The goal was to inform the development and use of virtual patients for PBL and to inform future research in this area. Methods An existing virtual patient for PBL was adapted for use in video and provided as an intervention to students in the transition year of the undergraduate medicine course at St George’s, University of London. Survey instruments were used to capture student and PBL tutor experiences and perceptions of the intervention, and a formative review meeting was run with PBL tutors. Descriptive statistics were generated for the structured responses and a thematic analysis was used to identify emergent themes in the unstructured responses. Results Analysis of student responses (n=119) and tutor comments (n=18) yielded 8 distinct themes relating to the perceived educational efficacy of information presented in video and text formats in a PBL context. Although some students found some characteristics of the videos beneficial, when asked to express a preference for video or text the majority of those that responded to the question (65%, 65/100) expressed a preference for text. Student responses indicated that the use of video slowed the pace of PBL and impeded students’ ability to review and critically appraise the presented information. Conclusions Our findings suggest that text was perceived to be a better source of information than video in virtual patients for PBL. More specifically, the use of video was perceived as beneficial for providing details, visual information, and context where text was unable to do so. However, learner acceptance of text was higher in the context of PBL, particularly when targeting clinical reasoning skills. This pilot study has provided the foundation for further research into the effectiveness of different virtual patient designs for PBL.

[1]  C. Beaumont,et al.  Virtual patients in a virtual world: Training paramedic students for practice , 2009, Medical teacher.

[2]  Nabil Zary,et al.  Web-Based Virtual Patients in Nursing Education: Development and Validation of Theory-Anchored Design and Activity Models , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[3]  John Q. Young,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Implications for medical education: AMEE Guide No. 86 , 2014, Medical teacher.

[4]  L. Lingard,et al.  Making sense of grounded theory in medical education , 2006, Medical education.

[5]  Rachel H. Ellaway Virtual patients as activities: exploring the research implications of an activity theoretical stance , 2014, Perspectives on medical education.

[6]  Robin Deterding,et al.  A Comparison of Critical Thinking in Groups of Third‐year Medical Students in Text, Video, and Virtual PBL Case Modalities , 2003, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[7]  A. Ziv,et al.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review , 2005, Medical teacher.

[8]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[9]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[10]  D. Davies,et al.  Design for learning: deconstructing virtual patient activities , 2011, Medical teacher.

[11]  H. Schmidt,et al.  The psychological basis of problem‐based learning: a review of the evidence , 1992, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[12]  ศิวะพร ภู่พันธ์,et al.  DESIGNING AND CONDUCTING MIXED METHODS RESEARCH (2nd Edition) , 2015 .

[13]  Iffat Ahmed,et al.  Video or paper for delivery of problem‐based learning cases? , 2013, Medical education.

[14]  A J J A Scherpbier,et al.  Comparison of text and video cases in a postgraduate problem‐based learning format , 2005, Medical education.

[15]  Terry Poulton,et al.  Exploring the Efficacy of Replacing Linear Paper-Based Patient Cases in Problem-Based Learning With Dynamic Web-Based Virtual Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[16]  Dejano T Sobral,et al.  What kind of motivation drives medical students' learning quests? , 2004, Medical education.

[17]  Terry Poulton,et al.  The replacement of ‘paper’ cases by interactive online virtual patients in problem-based learning , 2009, Medical teacher.

[18]  L. Lingard,et al.  Grounded theory in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 70 , 2012, Medical teacher.

[19]  Nabil Zary,et al.  Towards a typology of virtual patients , 2009, Medical teacher.

[20]  Terry Poulton,et al.  Improving assessment with virtual patients , 2009, Medical teacher.

[21]  Rachel H Ellaway,et al.  Context matters: emergent variability in an effectiveness trial of online teaching modules , 2014, Medical education.

[22]  C. V. D. van der Vleuten,et al.  Problem‐based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research , 2005, Medical education.

[23]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. , 2001 .

[24]  Terry Poulton,et al.  Virtual patients come of age , 2009, Medical teacher.

[25]  J. Bowen Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[27]  Nabil Zary,et al.  Virtual Patients in Primary Care: Developing a Reusable Model That Fosters Reflective Practice and Clinical Reasoning , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[28]  Sören Huwendiek,et al.  Design principles for virtual patients: a focus group study among students , 2009, Medical education.

[29]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  “Thick” authenticity: new media and authentic learning , 1999 .

[30]  G. McMahon,et al.  Video‐based cases disrupt deep critical thinking in problem‐based learning , 2012, Medical education.

[31]  Chara Balasubramaniam,et al.  Virtual patients: A year of change , 2011, Medical teacher.

[32]  Andrzej A. Kononowicz,et al.  Exploring the validity and reliability of a questionnaire for evaluating virtual patient design with a special emphasis on fostering clinical reasoning , 2015, Medical teacher.

[33]  R. Ellaway,et al.  Decision PBL: A 4-year retrospective case study of the use of virtual patients in problem-based learning , 2015, Medical teacher.

[34]  J. Bateman,et al.  Virtual patients can be used to teach clinical reasoning , 2012, The clinical teacher.

[35]  John Sandars It appeared to be a good idea at the time but … A few steps closer to understanding how technology can enhance teaching and learning in medical education , 2011, Medical teacher.

[36]  Gregor Kennedy,et al.  Towards a generalised conceptual framework for learning: the Learning Environment, Learning Processes and Learning Outcomes (LEPO) framework , 2010 .

[37]  J. Morse The implications of interview type and structure in mixed-method designs , 2012 .

[38]  W. McGaghie,et al.  A critical review of simulation‐based medical education research: 2003–2009 , 2010, Medical education.

[39]  R. Glavin,et al.  Low‐ to high‐fidelity simulation – a continuum of medical education? , 2003, Medical education.

[40]  Ba de Leng,et al.  How video cases should be used as authentic stimuli in problem‐based medical education , 2007, Medical education.

[41]  Geoff Norman,et al.  The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning , 2012, Medical education.

[42]  Charles G Prober,et al.  Lecture halls without lectures--a proposal for medical education. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  Geoffrey Norman,et al.  Problem-based learning makes a difference. But why? , 2008, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[44]  D. Cook,et al.  Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps , 2009, Medical education.

[45]  David M Fleiszer,et al.  Twelve tips to support the development of clinical reasoning skills using virtual patient cases , 2015, Medical teacher.

[46]  S Barry Issenberg,et al.  The scope of simulation-based healthcare education. , 2006, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.