Single Cell Time-resolved Quorum Responses Reveal Dependence on Cell Density and Configuration

Bacterial communication via quorum sensing has been extensively investigated in recent years. Bacteria communicate in a complex manner through the production, release, and reception of diffusible low molecular weight chemical signaling molecules. Much work has focused on understanding the basic mechanisms of quorum sensing. As more and more bacteria grow resistant to conventional antibiotics, the development of drugs that do not kill bacteria but instead interrupt their communication is of increasing interest. This study presents a method for analyzing bacterial communication by investigating single cell responses. Most conventional analysis methods for bacterial communication are based on the averaged response from many bacteria, masking how individual cells respond to their immediate environment. We applied a fiber-optic microarray to record cellular communication from single cells. Single cell quorum sensing systems have previously been employed, but the highly ordered array reported here is an improvement because it allows us to simultaneously investigate cellular communication in many different environments with known cellular densities and configurations. We employed this method to detect how genes under quorum regulation are induced or repressed over time on the single cell level and to determine whether cellular density and configuration are indicative of the single cell temporal patterns of gene expression.

[1]  S. Basu,et al.  A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation , 2005, Nature.

[2]  R. Redfield.  Is quorum sensing a side effect of diffusion sensing? , 2002, Trends in microbiology.

[3]  Sylvia Daunert,et al.  Biosensing systems for the detection of bacterial quorum signaling molecules. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[4]  David R Walt,et al.  Optical imaging fiber-based single live cell arrays: a high-density cell assay platform. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  Burkhard A. Hense,et al.  Does efficiency sensing unify diffusion and quorum sensing? , 2007, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[6]  J. Chambers.  A Concise Course in Advanced Level Statistics , 1984 .

[7]  S. Sørensen,et al.  Use of a Whole-Cell Biosensor and Flow Cytometry to Detect AHL Production by an Indigenous Soil Community During Decomposition of Litter , 2005, Microbial Ecology.

[8]  B. Bassler,et al.  Quorum sensing in bacteria. , 2001, Annual review of microbiology.

[9]  T. B. Rasmussen,et al.  Quorum sensing inhibitors: a bargain of effects. , 2006, Microbiology.

[10]  J. Costerton,et al.  Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms , 2001, The Lancet.

[11]  J. Fekete,et al.  Identification of bacterial N-acylhomoserine lactones (AHLs) with a combination of ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC), ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry, and in-situ biosensors , 2007, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[12]  David R Walt,et al.  Fiber-based single cell analysis of reporter gene expression in yeast two-hybrid systems. , 2007, Analytical biochemistry.

[13]  Ned S Wingreen,et al.  Quantifying the Integration of Quorum-Sensing Signals with Single-Cell Resolution , 2009, PLoS biology.

[14]  L. Steindler,et al.  Detection of quorum-sensing N-acyl homoserine lactone signal molecules by bacterial biosensors. , 2007, FEMS microbiology letters.

[15]  Paul Williams,et al.  Quorum sensing, communication and cross-kingdom signalling in the bacterial world. , 2007, Microbiology.

[16]  G. Salmond,et al.  Quorum Sensing: The Complexities of Chemical Communication between Bacteria , 2004, Complexus.

[17]  J. Dworkin,et al.  Microbial Interactions: Bacteria Talk to (Some of) Their Neighbors , 2009, Current Biology.

[18]  I. Khmel.  Quorum-sensing regulation of gene expression: Fundamental and applied aspects and the role in bacterial communication , 2006, Microbiology.

[19]  Bjarke Bak Christensen,et al.  gfp-Based N-Acyl Homoserine-Lactone Sensor Systems for Detection of Bacterial Communication , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[20]  P. Schröder,et al.  Uptake, degradation and chiral discrimination of N-acyl-D/L-homoserine lactones by barley (Hordeum vulgare) and yam bean (Pachyrhizus erosus) plants , 2007, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[21]  R. Ismagilov,et al.  Microfluidic confinement of single cells of bacteria in small volumes initiates high-density behavior of quorum sensing and growth and reveals its variability. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[22]  David R Walt,et al.  Simultaneously monitoring gene expression kinetics and genetic noise in single cells by optical well arrays. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[23]  T. B. Rasmussen,et al.  Quorum-sensing inhibitors as anti-pathogenic drugs. , 2006, International journal of medical microbiology : IJMM.

[24]  J. A. Hartigan,et al.  A k-means clustering algorithm , 1979 .

[25]  P. Schmitt‐Kopplin,et al.  Analysis of N‐acylhomoserine lactones after alkaline hydrolysis and anion‐exchange solid‐phase extraction by capillary zone electrophoresis‐mass spectrometry , 2005, Electrophoresis.

[26]  David R Walt,et al.  Living bacterial cell array for genotoxin monitoring. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[27]  Juan E. González,et al.  Messing with Bacterial Quorum Sensing , 2006, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[28]  Arul Jayaraman,et al.  Bacterial quorum sensing: signals, circuits, and implications for biofilms and disease. , 2008, Annual review of biomedical engineering.