Doing staff development: Practices, dilemmas and technologies

Online learning technologies now pervade higher education institutions, and the convergence of teaching and learning onto technological systems has created new work practices and a demand for staff development. Educational developers are located at a nexus between the institutional and pragmatic imperatives, from which tensions and incongruencies emerge and need to be resolved in daily practice. In this paper, this nexus is explored by analysing accounts of educational development practice from one institution, based on interviews with educational developers. This paper considers staff development practices in higher education in response to the processes of change associated with learning technology, and the strategies used to resolve incongruencies and conflicts that emerged from these practices were analysed. The discourse analytic method of "interpretative repertoires" (Potter & Wetherell, 1987) is used to explore the resolution of dilemmas in practice. In this case study, two contrasting repertoires are used to account for staff development: one that 'enables' academic staff in their use of learning technologies, and another which 'guides' staff in their online teaching towards specified technologies. The intersection of the two repertoires in the institution presented dilemmas for educational developers. The responses to these contexts and the implications for educational development are explored.

[1]  B. Latour Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 1999 .

[2]  Making Sense of Academic Development , 2006 .

[3]  Karen M. Scott,et al.  The balancing act: Managing emerging issues of elearning projects at the University of Sydney , 2005 .

[4]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  Implicit theories of learning and change: their role in the development of e-learning environments for higher education , 2003 .

[5]  Ronald Barnett,et al.  Realizing the University in an Age of Supercomplexity , 1999 .

[6]  Neil Pollock,et al.  When Is a Work-Around? Conflict and Negotiation in Computer Systems Development , 2005 .

[7]  Robyn Benson,et al.  Professional development for professional developers: who's learning about e-learning from whom? , 2006 .

[8]  Kerry Shephard The role of educational developers in the expansion of educational technology , 2004 .

[9]  Stuart D. Cunningham,et al.  The Business of borderless education , 2000 .

[10]  Richard A. Schwier,et al.  Agency of the instructional designer: Moral coherence and transformative social practice , 2005 .

[11]  S. Marginson Rethinking Academic Work in the Global Era , 2000 .

[12]  Lee W. Andresen Teaching Development in Higher Education as Scholarly Practice: A reply to Rowland et al. 'Turning Academics into Teachers?' , 2000 .

[13]  M. Grant,et al.  Communities of practice. , 2020, Health progress.

[14]  Kim McShane,et al.  Integrating face‐to‐face and online teaching: academics' role concept and teaching choices , 2004 .

[15]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[16]  R. Barnett Learning for an unknown future , 2004 .

[17]  J. Law After Method: Mess in Social Science Research , 2004 .

[18]  Ray Land,et al.  Agency, context and change in academic development , 2001 .

[19]  E. Brink,et al.  Constructing grounded theory : A practical guide through qualitative analysis , 2006 .

[20]  James Cornford,et al.  The Theory and Practice of the Virtual University: Working Through the Work of Making Work Mobile , 2002 .

[21]  C. Manathunga “Unhomely” Academic Developer Identities: More post‐colonial explorations , 2007 .

[22]  Jennifer L Bird Professional naval gazing: flexible learning professionals into the future , 2004 .

[23]  J. Potter,et al.  Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour , 1987 .

[24]  Paul Greenbank The academic's role: the need for a re-evaluation? , 2006 .

[25]  Somaiya Naidu Learning and Teaching with Technology : Principles and Practices , 2003 .

[26]  J. Willems Flexible Learning: Implications of “when‐ever”, “where‐ever” and “what‐ever” , 2005 .

[27]  L. McAlpine Coming of Age in a Time of Super‐complexity (with Apologies to both Mead and Barnett) , 2006 .