Partial rupture of a locked patch of the Sumatra megathrust during the 2007 earthquake sequence

The great Sumatra–Andaman earthquake and tsunami of 2004 was a dramatic reminder of the importance of understanding the seismic and tsunami hazards of subduction zones. In March 2005, the Sunda megathrust ruptured again, producing an event of moment magnitude (Mw) 8.6 south of the 2004 rupture area, which was the site of a similar event in 1861 (ref. 6). Concern was then focused on the Mentawai area, where large earthquakes had occurred in 1797 (Mw = 8.8) and 1833 (Mw = 9.0). Two earthquakes, one of Mw = 8.4 and, twelve hours later, one of Mw = 7.9, indeed occurred there on 12 September 2007. Here we show that these earthquakes ruptured only a fraction of the area ruptured in 1833 and consist of distinct asperities within a patch of the megathrust that had remained locked in the interseismic period. This indicates that the same portion of a megathrust can rupture in different patterns depending on whether asperities break as isolated seismic events or cooperate to produce a larger rupture. This variability probably arises from the influence of non-permanent barriers, zones with locally lower pre-stress due to the past earthquakes. The stress state of the portion of the Sunda megathrust that had ruptured in 1833 and 1797 was probably not adequate for the development of a single large rupture in 2007. The moment released in 2007 amounts to only a fraction both of that released in 1833 and of the deficit of moment that had accumulated as a result of interseismic strain since 1833. The potential for a large megathrust event in the Mentawai area thus remains large.

[1]  Pierre Henry,et al.  The Sumatra subduction zone: A case for a locked fault zone extending into the mantle , 2004 .

[2]  Chen Ji,et al.  Rupture Process of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake , 2005, Science.

[3]  Masanobu Shimada,et al.  Accuracy and Resolution of ALOS Interferometry: Vector Deformation Maps of the Father's Day Intrusion at Kilauea , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  P. Rosen,et al.  Updated repeat orbit interferometry package released , 2004 .

[5]  W. Thatcher.  Order and diversity in the modes of Circum-Pacific Earthquake recurrence , 1990 .

[6]  Howard A. Zebker,et al.  Phase unwrapping for large SAR interferograms: statistical segmentation and generalized network models , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  J. Curray,et al.  Seismic refraction studies of the Sunda Trench and Forearc Basin , 1980 .

[8]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  Uplift and subsidence associated with the great Aceh‐Andaman earthquake of 2004 , 2006 .

[9]  Akira Hasegawa,et al.  Interplate coupling beneath NE Japan inferred from three-dimensional displacement field , 2006 .

[10]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Seismic coupling and uncoupling at subduction zones , 1983 .

[11]  Yehuda Ben-Zion,et al.  Earthquake Failure Sequences Along a Cellular Fault Zone in a Three-Dimensional Elastic Solid Containing Asperity and Nonasperity Regions , 1993 .

[12]  Hai Cheng,et al.  Source parameters of the great Sumatran megathrust earthquakes of 1797 and 1833 inferred from coral microatolls , 2006 .

[13]  Chen Ji,et al.  Source Description of the 1999 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake, Part I: Wavelet Domain Inversion Theory and Resolution Analysis , 2002 .

[14]  M. Ando.  Source mechanisms and tectonic significance of historical earthquakes along the nankai trough, Japan , 1975 .

[15]  J. Tromp,et al.  The Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake , 2005 .

[16]  H. Kanamori,et al.  Application of an inhomogeneous stress (patch) model to complex subduction zone earthquakes: A discrete interaction matrix approach , 1987 .

[17]  V. E. Levin,et al.  Interseismic coupling and asperity distribution along the Kamchatka subduction zone , 2005 .

[18]  J. Freymueller,et al.  Absence of strain accumulation in the Western Shumagin Segment of the Alaska Subduction Zone , 1999 .

[19]  Rowena B. Lohman,et al.  Some thoughts on the use of InSAR data to constrain models of surface deformation: Noise structure and data downsampling , 2005 .

[20]  H. Kanamori,et al.  The Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake of 26 December 2004 , 2005, Science.

[21]  Michael Antolik,et al.  The June 2000 Mw 7.9 earthquakes south of Sumatra: Deformation in the India–Australia Plate , 2003 .

[22]  Javier F. Pacheco,et al.  Nature of seismic coupling along simple plate boundaries of the subduction type , 1993 .

[23]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Plate-boundary deformation associated with the great Sumatra–Andaman earthquake , 2006, Nature.

[24]  K. Sieh,et al.  Deformation and Slip Along the Sunda Megathrust in the Great 2005 Nias-Simeulue Earthquake , 2006, Science.

[25]  K. Sieh,et al.  Crustal deformation at the Sumatran Subduction Zone revealed by coral rings , 1999 .

[26]  John R. Rice,et al.  Aseismic slip transients emerge spontaneously in three-dimensional rate and state modeling of subduction earthquake sequences , 2005 .

[27]  H. Perfettini,et al.  Dynamics of a velocity strengthening fault region: Implications for slow earthquakes and postseismic slip , 2008 .

[28]  David A. Seal,et al.  The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission , 2007 .

[29]  Stability of the Rake during the 1992, Landers Earthquake. An indication for a small stress release? , 1995 .

[30]  K. Sieh,et al.  Paleogeodetic records of seismic and aseismic subduction from central Sumatran microatolls, Indonesia , 2004 .

[31]  Jim Mori,et al.  Are asperity patterns persistent? Implication from large earthquakes in Papua New Guinea , 2007 .

[32]  M. Simons,et al.  An aseismic slip pulse in northern Chile and along‐strike variations in seismogenic behavior , 2006 .

[33]  Jean-Philippe Avouac,et al.  Heterogeneous coupling on the Sumatra megathrust constrained from geodetic and paleogeodetic measurements , 2008 .

[34]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Frictional Afterslip Following the 2005 Nias-Simeulue Earthquake, Sumatra , 2006, Science.

[35]  E. Engdahl,et al.  Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[36]  T. P. Scoffin,et al.  Exposed limestones of the Northern Province of the Great Barrier Reef , 1978, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[37]  H. Kanamori,et al.  The asperity model and the nature of large subduction zone earthquakes. , 1982 .

[38]  K. Sieh,et al.  Modern Vertical Deformation above the Sumatran Subduction Zone: Paleogeodetic Insights from Coral Microatolls , 2000 .

[39]  Raul Madariaga,et al.  Complexity of seismicity due to highly rate‐dependent friction , 1996 .

[40]  K. Sieh,et al.  Interseismic deformation above the Sunda Megathrust recorded in coral microatolls of the Mentawai islands, West Sumatra , 2007 .

[41]  Chen Ji,et al.  Coseismic Slip and Afterslip of the Great Mw 9.15 Sumatra–Andaman Earthquake of 2004 , 2007 .

[42]  W. Mccann,et al.  Seismic history and seismotectonics of the Sunda Arc , 1987 .

[43]  C. Frohlich,et al.  Analysis of partially emerged corals and reef terraces in the central Vanuatu Arc: Comparison of contemporary coseismic and nonseismic with quaternary vertical movements , 1987 .