OHC response recruitment and its correlation with loudness recruitment

After proper noise exposure, Hensen's cells, which have been shown to follow closely the response characteristics of the outer hair cells, suffered a loss of sensitivity at low and moderate SPLs. The lower the stimulus level, the greater was the loss. When the low-SPL loss did not exceed about 40 dB, input-output functions showed an increased rate of amplitude growth, so that the post-exposure response caught up with its pre-exposure counterpart between 60 and 90 dB SPL, depending on the severity of the loss. These results, together with preceding clinical observations, led us to the conclusion that loudness recruitment occurs at least in part at the hair cell level and is basically a local event as opposed to a pathological spread of excitation. The response recruitment we have discovered appears to result from a decreased effect of the active feedback when the passive cochlear mechanisms are intact. Evidence for these relationships is presented and an explanation is offered for previous experimental successes and failures in observing a steepening of rate-intensity functions in auditory nerve fibers after noise exposures or administration of ototoxic drugs.

[1]  P Dallos,et al.  Properties of auditory nerve responses in absence of outer hair cells. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  E. Evans,et al.  The effects of intracochlear cyanide and tetrodotoxin on the properties of single cochlear nerve fibres in the cat. , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  R. A. Schmiedt,et al.  Effects of hair cell lesions on responses of cochlear nerve fibers. II. Single- and two-tone intensity functions in relation to tuning curves. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  W. E. Brownell,et al.  Concomitant salicylate-induced alterations of outer hair cell subsurface cisternae and electromotility , 1991, Journal of neurocytology.

[5]  R. Hellman Effect of noise bandwidth on the loudness of a 1000-Hz tone. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R. A. Schmiedt,et al.  Comparison of sound-transmission and cochlear-microphonic characteristics in Mongolian gerbil and guinea pig. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  A R Thornton,et al.  Low-frequency hearing loss: perception of filtered speech, psychophysical tuning curves, and masking. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  P. Stypulkowski Mechanisms of salicylate ototoxicity , 1990, Hearing Research.

[9]  J. Puel,et al.  The active process is affected first by intense sound exposure , 1988, Hearing Research.

[10]  W. Brownell,et al.  Effects of salicylate on shape, electromotility and membrane characteristics of isolated outer hair cells from guinea pig cochlea. , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[11]  Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al.  Phase Reversal in OHC Response at High Sound Intensities , 1989 .

[12]  J A Stillman,et al.  Intensity just-noticeable differences at equal-loudness levels in normal and pathological ears. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  G. Long,et al.  Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  P. Dallos The active cochlea , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  Changes in Cochlear Frequency Selectivity Produced by Tectorial-Membrane Manipulation , 1986 .

[16]  R F Hess,et al.  Effects of flanking noise bands on the rate of growth of loudness of tones in normal and recruiting ears. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Basilar membrane measurements and the travelling wave , 1986, Hearing Research.

[18]  J. Zwislocki Analysis of cochlear mechanics , 1986, Hearing Research.

[19]  P Dallos,et al.  Intracellular recordings from supporting cells in the guinea-pig cochlea: AC potentials. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  P Dallos,et al.  Production of cochlear potentials by inner and outer hair cells. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  E. Evans,et al.  The effects of intracochlear and systemic furosemide on the properties of single cochlear nerve fibres in the cat , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  P Dallos,et al.  Intracellular recordings from supporting cells in the guinea pig cochlea: DC potentials. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Ionic coupling among cells in the organ of Corti , 1992, Hearing Research.

[24]  Active Cochlear Feedback: Required Structure And Response Phase , 1990 .

[25]  P Dallos,et al.  Intracellular recordings from cochlear outer hair cells. , 1982, Science.

[26]  M. Ruggero,et al.  Systemic Injection of Furosemide Alters the Mechanical Response to Sound of the Basilar Membrane , 1990 .

[27]  R A Levine,et al.  Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Sensorineural hearing loss. , 1970, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[28]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Intensity discrimination of noise in the presence of band-reject noise. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  What is the cochlear place code for pitch? , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica.