Comparison of viscoelastic properties of cancer and normal thyroid cells on different stiffness substrates

We used atomic force microscopy (AFM) technique to measure the viscoelastic response of cancer and normal thyroid cells on different stiffness polyacrylamide gels. After applying a step in contact we recorded the stress relaxation of cells in order to measure their viscous and elastic properties. With the help of an extended version of the Hertz model, we could quantify for the first time by AFM the elastic modulus and the dynamic viscosity of cells on substrates with different stiffnesses. We have cultured anaplastic carcinoma and normal thyroid cells on three different substrates: polyacrylamide gels with elastic modulus in a range of 3–5 and 30–40 kPa and “infinitely” stiff Petri dishes. Whereas normal thyroid cells adapted their mechanical properties to different stiffness substrates, cancer cells were less affected by the surrounding stiffness. Normal cells changed the elastic modulus from 1.2 to 1.6 and to 2.6 kPa with increasing substrate stiffness; the dynamic viscosity values varied from 230 to 515 and to 470 Pa·s, accordingly. By contrast, the values for cancer cells were rather constant regardless of substrate stiffness (in average the elastic modulus was 1.3 kPa and the dynamic viscosity was 300 Pa·s). This difference in sensing and reacting to the mechanical properties of the substrate shows that normal and cancer cells interact differently with the neighboring tissue, which may be related to the ability of cancer cells to form metastases.

[1]  A. Böhle,et al.  Molecular aspects of bladder cancer III. Prognostic markers of bladder cancer. , 2002, European urology.

[2]  H. Butt,et al.  Comparative analysis of viscosity of complex liquids and cytoplasm of mammalian cells at the nanoscale. , 2011, Nano letters.

[3]  M Radmacher,et al.  Measuring the elastic properties of biological samples with the AFM. , 1997, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[4]  Yingxiao Wang,et al.  3D traction stresses activate protease-dependent invasion of cancer cells. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[5]  J. Condeelis,et al.  Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in cancer cell migration and invasion. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[6]  D. Weitz,et al.  Rheology of F-actin solutions determined from thermally driven tracer motion , 2000 .

[7]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Maayan Schvartzer,et al.  Mechanical Interaction of Metastatic Cancer Cells with a Soft Gel , 2015 .

[9]  J. Toca-Herrera,et al.  Stress relaxation microscopy: imaging local stress in cells. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Kuo-Kang Liu,et al.  Optical tweezers for single cells , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[11]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Amphibian oocyte nuclei expressing lamin A with the progeria mutation E145K exhibit an increased elastic modulus , 2011, Nucleus.

[12]  Teodor Gotszalk,et al.  Calibration of atomic force microscope , 2008 .

[13]  Erik F. Y. Hom,et al.  Diffusion of green fluorescent protein in the aqueous-phase lumen of endoplasmic reticulum. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[14]  J A Frangos,et al.  New fluorescent probes for the measurement of cell membrane viscosity. , 2001, Chemistry & biology.

[15]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Imaging viscoelastic properties of live cells by AFM: power-law rheology on the nanoscale. , 2015, Soft matter.

[16]  Mark A Haidekker,et al.  Characterization of changes in the viscosity of lipid membranes with the molecular rotor FCVJ. , 2008, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[17]  D. Needham,et al.  Rapid Flow of Passive Neutrophils Into a 4 μm Pipet and Measurement of Cytoplasmic Viscosity , 1990 .

[18]  Manfred Radmacher,et al.  Comparison of mechanical properties of normal and malignant thyroid cells. , 2012, Micron.

[19]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Cell mechanics as a marker for diseases: Biomedical applications of AFM , 2016 .

[20]  I. Fidler,et al.  Critical determinants of cancer metastasis: rationale for therapy , 1999, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[21]  D. Weihs,et al.  Quantitative measures to reveal coordinated cytoskeleton-nucleus reorganization during in vitro invasion of cancer cells , 2015 .

[22]  Manfred Radmacher,et al.  Atomic force microscope with magnetic force modulation , 1994 .

[23]  N. Gavara,et al.  Probing mechanical properties of living cells by atomic force microscopy with blunted pyramidal cantilever tips. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  Adam J Engler,et al.  Preparation of Hydrogel Substrates with Tunable Mechanical Properties , 2010, Current protocols in cell biology.

[25]  C D Woodworth,et al.  Atomic force microscopy detects differences in the surface brush of normal and cancerous cells. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[26]  E. Evans,et al.  Apparent viscosity and cortical tension of blood granulocytes determined by micropipet aspiration. , 1989, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Contributions of talin-1 to glioma cell–matrix tensional homeostasis , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[28]  P C Elwood,et al.  Fibrinogen, Viscosity, and White Blood Cell Count Are Major Risk Factors for Ischemic Heart Disease: The Caerphilly and Speedwell Collaborative Heart Disease Studies , 1991, Circulation.

[29]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Rheology of Living Cells , 2011 .

[30]  M. Lekka,et al.  Cancer cell recognition--mechanical phenotype. , 2012, Micron.

[31]  C. Lim,et al.  AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. , 2008, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[32]  J. Bechhoefer,et al.  Calibration of atomic‐force microscope tips , 1993 .

[33]  Robert Ros,et al.  Correlating confocal microscopy and atomic force indentation reveals metastatic cancer cells stiffen during invasion into collagen I matrices , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[34]  Chang Kyoung Choi,et al.  Simultaneous measurements of cytoplasmic viscosity and intracellular vesicle sizes for live human brain cancer cells. , 2011, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[35]  É. Fodor,et al.  Active Mechanics Reveal Molecular-Scale Force Kinetics in Living Oocytes , 2015, Biophysical journal.

[36]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[37]  M. Bissell,et al.  Cell-ECM interactions in development , 1995 .

[38]  I. Macdonald,et al.  Metastasis: Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[39]  J. Toca-Herrera,et al.  Stress relaxation and creep on living cells with the atomic force microscope: a means to calculate elastic moduli and viscosities of cell components , 2010, Nanotechnology.

[40]  L. Liotta,et al.  General mechanisms of metastasis , 1997, Cancer.

[41]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Comparison of the viscoelastic properties of cells from different kidney cancer phenotypes measured with atomic force microscopy , 2013, Nanotechnology.

[42]  Subra Suresh,et al.  Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[43]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Stiffness Gradients Mimicking In Vivo Tissue Variation Regulate Mesenchymal Stem Cell Fate , 2011, PloS one.

[44]  James K. Gimzewski,et al.  Applicability of AFM in cancer detection , 2009 .

[45]  Sophia Mã ¶ ller,et al.  Biomechanics — Mechanical properties of living tissue , 1982 .

[46]  Maurizio Ventre,et al.  Engineering Cell Instructive Materials To Control Cell Fate and Functions through Material Cues and Surface Patterning. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[47]  Zbigniew Stachura,et al.  Cancer cell detection in tissue sections using AFM. , 2012, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[48]  C. Waters,et al.  Hyperoxia alters the mechanical properties of alveolar epithelial cells. , 2012, American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology.

[49]  Z. Stachura,et al.  Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy , 1999, European Biophysics Journal.

[50]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. , 2009, Cancer research.

[51]  P. Steeg Tumor metastasis: mechanistic insights and clinical challenges , 2006, Nature Medicine.

[52]  C. Marcelo,et al.  EPR measurements showing that plasma membrane viscosity can vary from 30 to 100 cP in human epidermal cell strains , 1996 .

[53]  Robert Mundt Über die Berührung fester elastischer Körper: Eine allgemeinverständliche Darstellung der Theorie von Heinrich Hertz , 1950 .

[54]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Measuring the viscoelastic creep of soft samples by step response AFM. , 2016, Soft matter.

[55]  Paolo A Netti,et al.  Determinants of cell–material crosstalk at the interface: towards engineering of cell instructive materials , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[56]  Daphne Weihs,et al.  Metastatic cancer cells tenaciously indent impenetrable, soft substrates , 2013 .

[57]  T. Camesano,et al.  Measuring the mechanical properties of living cells using atomic force microscopy. , 2013, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[58]  R. Assoian,et al.  Studying the effects of matrix stiffness on cellular function using acrylamide-based hydrogels. , 2010, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[59]  S. Brooks,et al.  Molecular interactions in cancer cell metastasis. , 2010, Acta histochemica.

[60]  K. Luby-Phelps,et al.  Cytoarchitecture and physical properties of cytoplasm: volume, viscosity, diffusion, intracellular surface area. , 2000, International review of cytology.

[61]  R. Hochmuth,et al.  Micropipette aspiration of living cells. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[62]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Changes in cytoskeletal dynamics and nonlinear rheology with metastatic ability in cancer cell lines , 2013, Physical biology.

[63]  Daniel Isabey,et al.  Assessment of mechanical properties of adherent living cells by bead micromanipulation: comparison of magnetic twisting cytometry vs optical tweezers. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[64]  Daphne Weihs,et al.  Intracellular Mechanics and Activity of Breast Cancer Cells Correlate with Metastatic Potential , 2012, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[65]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[66]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Isoform-Specific Contributions of α-Actinin to Glioma Cell Mechanobiology , 2009, PloS one.

[67]  M. Kuimova Mapping viscosity in cells using molecular rotors. , 2012, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[68]  Yang-Kao Wang,et al.  Mechanical phenotype of cancer cells: cell softening and loss of stiffness sensing , 2015, Oncotarget.

[69]  Dan L. Sackett,et al.  Fabrication of Hydrogels with Steep Stiffness Gradients for Studying Cell Mechanical Response , 2012, PloS one.

[70]  M. Lekka,et al.  Depth-sensing analysis of cytoskeleton organization based on AFM data , 2011, European Biophysics Journal.

[71]  Arvind Raman,et al.  Local viscoelastic properties of live cells investigated using dynamic and quasi-static atomic force microscopy methods. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[72]  W. Webb,et al.  Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. , 1976, Biophysical journal.

[73]  Klaus Suhling,et al.  Imaging intracellular viscosity of a single cell during photoinduced cell death. , 2009, Nature chemistry.