Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.

OBJECTIVES The effectiveness of hearing protection devices (HPDs), when used in workplace conditions, has been shown over the years to be usually lower than the labeled values obtained under well-controlled laboratory conditions. Causes for such discrepancies have been listed and discussed by many authors. This study is an attempt to understand the issues in greater details and quantify some of these factors by looking at the performance of hearing protectors as a function of time during full work shift conditions. METHODS A non-invasive field microphone in the real ear (F-MIRE)-based method has been developed for measuring the effectiveness of different HPDs as a function of time in the workplace. Details of the test procedures, the equipment used, and the post-processing operations are presented and discussed. The methodology was developed in such a way that a complete time and frequency representation are possible. The system was used on a total of 24 workers in eight different companies. Work shifts of up to 9-h long were recorded. Various types of earmuffs and one type of molded earplugs were tested. RESULTS Attenuation data reported as a function of time showed, for most workers tested, considerable fluctuations over entire work shift periods. Parts of these fluctuations are attributed to variations in the low-frequency content in the noise (in particular for earmuffs) as well as poor insertion and/or fitting of earplugs. Lower performances than laboratory-based ones were once again observed for most cases tested but also, important left and right ear differences were obtained for many individuals. When reported as a function of frequency, the attenuation results suggested that the few approximations used to relate the measurements to subjective real-ear-attenuation-at-threshold (REAT) data were realistic. CONCLUSIONS The use of individualized attenuation data and performance ratings for HPDs as well as a good knowledge of the ambient noise in the workplace are key ingredients when evaluating the performance of hearing protectors in field conditions.

[1]  Jérémie Voix,et al.  État de l'art et perspectives sur la mesure des performances effectives des protecteurs auditifs en milieu de travail , 2008 .

[2]  Min-Yong Park,et al.  Labortory versus field attenuation of selected hearing protectors , 1991 .

[3]  Alberto Behar FIELD EVALUATION OF HEARING PROTECTORS , 1985 .

[4]  Alf Axelsson,et al.  Scientific basis of noise-induced hearing loss , 1996 .

[5]  R J Goff,et al.  A FIELD EVALUATION OF MUFF-TYPE HEARING PROTECTION DEVICES , 1984 .

[6]  Thais C. Morata,et al.  Factors affecting the use of hearing protectors in a population of printing workers. , 2001, Noise & health.

[7]  Min-Yong Park,et al.  Effects of work conditions simulated in a laboratory environment and wearer fit on attenuation of slow-recovery foam earplugs , 1990 .

[8]  Michael J. Ellenbecker,et al.  Feasibility Assessment of a New Method for Measurement of Hearing Protector Attenuation: Bone Conduction Loudness Balance , 1997 .

[9]  Jérémie Voix Mise au point d'un bouchon d'oreille "intelligent" , 2006 .

[10]  E H Berger,et al.  Methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Elliott H. Berger,et al.  Methods of fit testing hearing protectors, with representative field test data , 2008 .

[12]  Richard Neitzel,et al.  The Effectiveness of Hearing Protection Among Construction Workers , 2005, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[13]  Lee D Hager Fit testing ear plugs. , 2006, Occupational health & safety.

[14]  Jérémie Voix,et al.  Methods of developing and validating a field-mire approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation , 2007 .

[15]  Jérémie Voix,et al.  The objective measurement of individual earplug field performance. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Richard Neitzel,et al.  Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[17]  Paolo Lenzuni,et al.  An Educated Guess on the Workplace Attenuation Variability of Ear Muffs , 2009, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[18]  Hearing Protector Performance: How They Work-and-What Goes Wrong in the Real World , 2000 .

[19]  J G Casali,et al.  Attenuation Performance of Four Hearing Protectors under Dynamic Movement and Different User Fitting Conditions , 1990, Human factors.

[20]  Roald Kluge,et al.  "Real-world" attenuation of muff-type hearing protectors: The effect of spectacles , 2004 .

[21]  D A Giardino,et al.  Evaluation of muff-type hearing protectors as used in a working environment. , 1996, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[22]  Richard M. Lueptow,et al.  Attenuation in tertiary gas mixtures with two relaxing components , 1999 .

[23]  P M Arezes,et al.  Hearing protectors acceptability in noisy environments. , 2002, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[24]  M J Kerr,et al.  Use of hearing protection and perceptions of noise exposure and hearing loss among construction workers. , 1998, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[25]  John R Franks,et al.  Alternative field methods for measuring hearing protector performance. , 2003, AIHA journal : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[26]  Jérémie Voix,et al.  The ANSI standard S12. 68-2007 method of estimating effective a-weighted sound pressure levels when hearing protectors are worn: A canadian perspective , 2008 .

[27]  Michael J. Ellenbecker,et al.  Hearing Protector Attenuation Measurement by Bone Conduction Loudness Balance Compared with Real Ear Attenuation at Threshold in a Sound Field , 1997 .

[28]  D Y Chung,et al.  The performance of circumaural hearing protectors by dosimetry. , 1983, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[29]  William J. Murphy,et al.  Evaluation of a FitCheck hearing protector test system , 1999 .