Reactive information foraging for evolving goals

Information foraging models have predicted the navigation paths of people browsing the web and (more recently) of programmers while debugging, but these models do not explicitly model users' goals evolving over time. We present a new information foraging model called PFIS2 that does model information seeking with potentially evolving goals. We then evaluated variants of this model in a field study that analyzed programmers' daily navigations over a seven-month period. Our results were that PFIS2 predicted users' navigation remarkably well, even though the goals of navigation, and even the information landscape itself, were changing markedly during the pursuit of information.

[1]  Robert W. Reeder,et al.  Information scent as a driver of Web behavior graphs: results of a protocol analysis method for Web usability , 2001, CHI.

[2]  J. Nielsen.  Information foraging : Why google makes people leave your site faster , 2003 .

[3]  Marc Najork,et al.  A large‐scale study of the evolution of Web pages , 2004, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[4]  Thomas Zimmermann,et al.  What Makes a Good Bug Report? , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[5]  Brad A. Myers,et al.  An Exploratory Study of How Developers Seek, Relate, and Collect Relevant Information during Software Maintenance Tasks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[6]  Janice Singer,et al.  Hipikat: a project memory for software development , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[7]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Using information scent to model user information needs and actions and the Web , 2001, CHI.

[8]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[9]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[10]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[11]  Peter Pirolli,et al.  Information Foraging , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[12]  Wai-Tat Fu,et al.  SNIF-ACT: A Cognitive Model of User Navigation on the World Wide Web , 2007, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  Emily Hill,et al.  Automatically capturing source code context of NL-queries for software maintenance and reuse , 2009, 2009 IEEE 31st International Conference on Software Engineering.

[14]  Rachel K. E. Bellamy,et al.  Can information foraging pick the fix? A field study , 2008, 2008 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing.

[15]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Scentindex: Conceptually Reorganizing Subject Indexes for Reading , 2006, 2006 IEEE Symposium On Visual Analytics Science And Technology.

[16]  Rachel K. E. Bellamy,et al.  Using information scent to model the dynamic foraging behavior of programmers in maintenance tasks , 2008, CHI.

[17]  Peter Pirolli,et al.  Computational models of information scent-following in a very large browsable text collection , 1997, CHI.

[18]  P. Pirolli.  Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information , 2007 .

[19]  Julie Chen,et al.  The bloodhound project: automating discovery of web usability issues using the InfoScentπ simulator , 2003, CHI '03.

[20]  Joseph Lawrance,et al.  IBM Research Report How People Debug, Revisited: An Information Foraging Theory Perspective , 2009 .

[21]  Ruven E. Brooks,et al.  Towards a Theory of the Comprehension of Computer Programs , 1983, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[22]  Brad A. Myers,et al.  A Linguistic Analysis of How People Describe Software Problems , 2006, Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC'06).

[23]  Thomas Zimmermann,et al.  What Makes a Good Bug Report? , 2010, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[24]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Information foraging in information access environments , 1995, CHI '95.

[25]  Martin P. Robillard,et al.  Concern graphs: finding and describing concerns using structural program dependencies , 2002, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2002.

[26]  Luca Becchetti,et al.  Link analysis for Web spam detection , 2008, TWEB.