Performance study of cyclostationary based digital modulation classification schemes

Automatic Modulation Classification (AMC) is a essential component in Cognitive Radio (CR) for recognizing the modulation scheme. Many modulated signals manifest the property of cyclostationarity as a feature so it can be exploited for classification. In this paper, we study the performance of digital modulation classification technique based on the cyclostationary features and different classifiers such as Neural Network, Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbor, Naive Bayes, Linear Discriminant Analysis and Neuro-Fuzzy classifier. In this study we considered modulations i.e. BPSK, QPSK, FSK and MSK for classification. All classification methods studied using performance matrix including classification accuracy and computational complexity (time). The robustness of these methods are studied with SNR ranging from 0 to 20dB. Based upon the result we found that combining cyclostationary features with Naive Bayes and Linear Discriminant Analysis classifiers leads to provide better classification accuracy with less computational complexity.

[1]  B. Ramkumar,et al.  Automatic modulation classification for cognitive radios using cyclic feature detection , 2009, IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine.

[2]  S. A. Alshebeili,et al.  An overview of feature-based methods for digital modulation classification , 2013, 2013 1st International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing, and their Applications (ICCSPA).

[3]  Pat Langley,et al.  Estimating Continuous Distributions in Bayesian Classifiers , 1995, UAI.

[4]  Asoke K. Nandi,et al.  Automatic Modulation Classification Using Combination of Genetic Programming and KNN , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[5]  Joseph E. Beck,et al.  Naive Bayes Classifiers for User Modeling , 1999 .

[6]  Nong Ye,et al.  Naïve Bayes Classifier , 2013 .

[7]  Asoke K. Nandi,et al.  Automatic digital modulation recognition using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm , 2004, Signal Process..

[8]  Yuan Yang,et al.  Recognition of Cyclostationary Signals Smoothed , 2012, ITCS 2012.

[9]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  PCA versus LDA , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  R. Sankar,et al.  Automatic Modulation Recognition techniques based on cyclostationary and multifractal features for distinguishing LFM, PWM and PPM waveforms used in radar systems as example of artificial intelligence implementation in test , 2012, 2012 IEEE AUTOTESTCON Proceedings.

[11]  Ali Abdi,et al.  Survey of automatic modulation classification techniques: classical approaches and new trends , 2007, IET Commun..

[12]  阿部 重夫 Pattern classification : neuro-fuzzy methods and their comparison , 2001 .