Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Utility Based Network Selection Approach for High-Speed Railway Scenario

Due to the complexity and fluctuation of the wireless network state in high-speed mobility scenarios, the existing works related to network selection face a great challenge for selecting the accurate network in terms of the imprecise information and mobility. Therefore, we design a novel dynamic imprecise-aware network selection approach, named FSNS by taking advantage of fuzzy logic and utility function of multiple attributes. Our proposed approach not only copes with imprecise network information but also dynamically adapts to the high-speed mobility scenarios, which are not presented for the existing proposals. In this paper, we compare FSNS approach with an enhanced TOPSIS method through simulation experiments of two types of services. The results demonstrate that FSNS outperforms TOPSIS for a preferable decision to keep relatively stable and reduce abnormal selection. The conclusions of experimental results have some extent pragmatic value because the simulation imitates network state in the high-speed mobile environment by real world data from high-speed railways.

[1]  Andreas F. Molisch,et al.  High-Speed Railway Communications: From GSM-R to LTE-R , 2016, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[2]  Wolfgang Hauke Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy-MADM) , 1998 .

[3]  Mohsen Guizani,et al.  Transactions papers a routing-driven Elliptic Curve Cryptography based key management scheme for Heterogeneous Sensor Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  Guy Pujolle,et al.  ABCDecision: A Simulation Platform for Access Selection Algorithms in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks , 2010, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[5]  Klaus Moessner,et al.  Dynamic Heterogeneous Learning Games for Opportunistic Access in LTE-Based Macro/Femtocell Deployments , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[6]  Said Hoceini,et al.  An Evidential Approach for Network Interface Selection in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks , 2016, 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[7]  Xiaojiang Du,et al.  Maintaining Differentiated Coverage in Heterogeneous Sensor Networks , 2005, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[8]  Neal Seitz ITU-T QoS standards for IP-based networks , 2003, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[9]  Rajasekhar Mungara,et al.  A Routing-Driven Elliptic Curve Cryptography based Key Management Scheme for Heterogeneous Sensor Networks , 2014 .

[10]  Hongke Zhang,et al.  Link State Prediction-Based Reliable Transmission for High-Speed Railway Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[11]  Eric van den Berg,et al.  Dynamic Network Selection using Kernels , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[12]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  A flexible and generalized framework for access network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks , 2017, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[13]  M. Sajid Mushtaq,et al.  TOPSIS-based dynamic approach for mobile network interface selection , 2016, Comput. Networks.

[14]  Wenhui Zhang,et al.  Handover decision using fuzzy MADM in heterogeneous networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8733).

[15]  Xiaojiang Du,et al.  Cognitive femtocell networks: an opportunistic spectrum access for future indoor wireless coverage , 2013, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[16]  Lusheng Wang,et al.  Mathematical Modeling for Network Selection in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks — A Tutorial , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.