Developing criteria and data to determine best options for expanding the core CODIS loci

BackgroundRecently, the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) Core Loci Working Group established by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reviewed and recommended changes to the CODIS core loci. The Working Group identified 20 short tandem repeat (STR) loci (composed of the original CODIS core set loci (minus TPOX), four European recommended loci, PentaE, and DYS391) plus the Amelogenin marker as the new core set. Before selecting and finalizing the core loci, some evaluations are needed to provide guidance for the best options of core selection.MethodThe performance of current and newly proposed CODIS core loci sets were evaluated with simplified analyses for adventitious hit rates in reasonably large datasets under single-source profile comparisons, mixture comparisons and kinship searches, and for international data sharing. Informativeness (for example, match probability, average kinship index (AKI)) and mutation rates of each locus were some of the criteria to consider for loci selection. However, the primary factor was performance with challenged forensic samples.ResultsThe current battery of loci provided in already validated commercial kits meet the needs for single-source profile comparisons and international data sharing, even with relatively large databases. However, the 13 CODIS core loci are not sufficiently powerful for kinship analyses and searching potential contributors of mixtures in larger databases; 19 or more autosomal STR loci perform better. Y-chromosome STR (Y-STR) loci are very useful to trace paternal lineage, deconvolve female and male mixtures, and resolve inconsistencies with Amelogenin typing. The DYS391 locus is of little theoretical or practical use. Combining five or six Y-chromosome STR loci with existing autosomal STR loci can produce better performance than the same number of autosomal loci for kinship analysis and still yield a sufficiently low match probability for single-source profile comparisons.ConclusionA more comprehensive study should be performed to provide the necessary information to decision makers and stakeholders about the construction of a new set of core loci for CODIS. Finally, selection of loci should be driven by the concept that the needs of casework should be supported by the processes of CODIS (or for that matter any forensic DNA database).

[1]  R. Chakraborty,et al.  Texas Population Substructure and Its Impact on Estimating the Rarity of Y STR Haplotypes from DNA Evidence * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  Corrigendum to “Linkage disequilibrium analysis of D12S391 and vWA in U.S. population and paternity samples” [Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. (in press), doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.09.003] , 2011 .

[3]  Niels Morling,et al.  The evolution of DNA databases--recommendations for new European STR loci. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[4]  B Budowle,et al.  STR primer concordance study. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[5]  US forensic Y-chromosome short tandem repeats database. , 2010, Legal medicine.

[6]  B Budowle,et al.  CODIS STR loci data from 41 sample populations. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[7]  Douglas R Hares,et al.  Expanding the CODIS core loci in the United States. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[8]  P. Gill,et al.  The recombination landscape around forensic STRs: Accurate measurement of genetic distances between syntenic STR pairs using HapMap high density SNP data. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[9]  Bruce Budowle,et al.  Comparisons of Familial DNA Database Searching Strategies , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  Niels Morling,et al.  New multiplexes for Europe-amendments and clarification of strategic development. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[11]  Bruce Budowle,et al.  Choosing Relatives for DNA Identification of Missing Persons , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[12]  Sascha Willuweit,et al.  Y chromosome haplotype reference database (YHRD): update. , 2007, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[13]  Benjamin E. Krenke,et al.  The single most polymorphic STR Locus: SE33 performance in U.S. populations , 2009 .

[14]  Bruce S Weir,et al.  Matching and partially-matching DNA profiles. , 2004, Journal of forensic sciences.

[15]  R. Chakraborty,et al.  Interpreting Y chromosome STR haplotype mixture. , 2010, Legal medicine.

[16]  Bruce S Weir,et al.  THE RARITY OF DNA PROFILES. , 2007, The annals of applied statistics.

[17]  Bruce Budowle,et al.  Population genetic analyses of the NGM STR loci , 2010, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[18]  J. Butler,et al.  Linkage disequilibrium analysis of D12S391 and vWA in U.S. population and paternity samples. , 2011, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[19]  Yan Jiang-wei.  Issues on China forensic DNA database , 2011 .

[20]  C. Hohoff,et al.  Identification of DYS385 allele variants by using shorter amplicons and Northern Thai haplotype data. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[21]  R. Chakraborty,et al.  Mutation rates at Y chromosome short tandem repeats in Texas populations. , 2009, Forensic science international. Genetics.