Universal scaling-law for flow resistance over canopies with complex morphology

Flow resistance caused by vegetation is a key parameter to properly assess flood management and river restoration. However, quantifying the friction factor or any of its alternative metrics, e.g. the drag coefficient, in canopies with complex geometry has proven elusive. We explore the effect of canopy morphology on vegetated channels flow structure and resistance by treating the canopy as a porous medium characterized by an effective permeability, a property that describes the ease with which water can flow through the canopy layer. We employ a two-domain model for flow over and within the canopy, which couples the log-law in the free layer to the Darcy-Brinkman equation in the vegetated layer. We validate the model analytical solutions for the average velocity profile within and above the canopy, the volumetric discharge and the friction factor against data collected across a wide range of canopy morphologies encountered in riverine systems. Results indicate agreement between model predictions and data for both simple and complex plant morphologies. For low submergence canopies, we find a universal scaling law that relates friction factor with canopy permeability and a rescaled bulk Reynolds number. This provides a valuable tool to assess habitats sustainability associated with hydro-dynamical conditions.

[1]  William Nardin,et al.  Optimum vegetation height and density for inorganic sedimentation in deltaic marshes , 2014 .

[2]  Maurizio Righetti,et al.  Flow analysis in a channel with flexible vegetation using double-averaging method , 2008 .

[3]  I. Battiato Self-similarity in coupled Brinkman/Navier–Stokes flows , 2012, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  Davide Poggi,et al.  Hydraulic resistance of submerged rigid vegetation derived from first‐order closure models , 2009 .

[5]  Ilenia Battiato,et al.  Single‐parameter model of vegetated aquatic flows , 2014 .

[6]  Joel S. Weitzman,et al.  A simple and practical model for combined wave–current canopy flows , 2015, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  David R. Plew,et al.  Depth-Averaged Drag Coefficient for Modeling Flow through Suspended Canopies , 2011 .

[8]  G. Belaud,et al.  Velocity profiles in a real vegetated channel , 2015, Environmental Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Allen Bateman,et al.  An Open Channel Flow Experimental and Theoretical Study of Resistance and Turbulent Characterization over Flexible Vegetated Linings , 2003 .

[10]  M. Ghisalberti Obstructed shear flows: similarities across systems and scales , 2009, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Anthony J. C. Ladd,et al.  Moderate Reynolds number flows through periodic and random arrays of aligned cylinders , 1996, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Christopher D. Cornelisen,et al.  EFFECTS OF WATER VELOCITY AND CANOPY MORPHOLOGY ON AMMONIUM UPTAKE BY SEAGRASS COMMUNITIES , 2000 .

[13]  K. Sand‐Jensen,et al.  Drag and reconfiguration of freshwater macrophytes , 2003 .

[14]  H. Nepf Flow and Transport in Regions with Aquatic Vegetation , 2012 .

[15]  J. Järvelä,et al.  Characteristic reference areas for estimating flow resistance of natural foliated vegetation , 2013 .

[16]  V. Nikora,et al.  Velocity profiles in vegetated open-channel flows: combined effects of multiple mechanisms , 2013 .

[17]  Hans-Jürgen Warnecke,et al.  Orthogonal Distance Fitting of Implicit Curves and Surfaces , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  C. Houser,et al.  Influence of Blade Flexibility on the Drag Coefficient of Aquatic Vegetation , 2015, Estuaries and Coasts.

[19]  I. Battiato,et al.  A reduced complexity model for dynamic similarity in obstructed shear flows , 2013 .

[20]  I. Battiato Effective medium theory for drag-reducing micro-patterned surfaces in turbulent flows , 2013, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[21]  Rui M. L. Ferreira,et al.  Parameterization of the logarithmic layer of double-averaged streamwise velocity profiles in gravel-bed river flows , 2008 .

[22]  V. Nikora,et al.  Plant patch hydrodynamics in streams: Mean flow, turbulence, and drag forces , 2012 .

[23]  Alejandro Orfila,et al.  Field observations of wave‐induced streaming through a submerged seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) meadow , 2013 .

[24]  Juha Järvelä,et al.  Modeling the flow resistance of woody vegetation using physically based properties of the foliage and stem , 2014 .

[25]  Enrique R. Vivoni,et al.  Flow structure in depth-limited, vegetated flow , 2000 .

[26]  Anne F. Lightbody,et al.  Effects of Added Vegetation on Sand Bar Stability and Stream Hydrodynamics , 2010 .

[27]  M. Schirmer,et al.  Water quality deterioration as a driver for river restoration: a review of case studies from Asia, Europe and North America , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[28]  Jochen Aberle,et al.  Flow resistance of emergent rigid and flexible floodplain vegetation , 2013 .

[29]  Monica Rivas Casado,et al.  Automated Identification of River Hydromorphological Features Using UAV High Resolution Aerial Imagery , 2015, Sensors.

[30]  A. Folkard Vegetated flows in their environmental context: a review , 2011 .

[31]  Catherine Wilson,et al.  Open Channel Flow through Different Forms of Submerged Flexible Vegetation , 2003 .

[32]  Akira Sase,et al.  Drag force due to vegetation in mangrove swamps , 1997 .

[33]  E. Cowen,et al.  A k–ε turbulence model based on the scales of vertical shear and stem wakes valid for emergent and submerged vegetated flows , 2012, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[34]  Joby Boxall,et al.  Effects of emergent and submerged natural vegetation on longitudinal mixing in open channel flow , 2010 .

[35]  Andrea Defina,et al.  Mean flow and turbulence in vegetated open channel flow , 2005 .

[36]  Catherine Wilson,et al.  An improved Cauchy number approach for predicting the drag and reconfiguration of flexible vegetation , 2015 .

[37]  H. Nepf Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation , 1999 .

[38]  J. Álvarez-Ramírez,et al.  Validity of the permeability Carman–Kozeny equation: A volume averaging approach , 2009 .

[39]  Alessandra Crosato,et al.  Representing plants as rigid cylinders in experiments and models , 2016 .

[40]  Harry L. Jenter,et al.  Drag coefficients for modeling flow through emergent vegetation in the Florida Everglades , 2004 .

[41]  A. Dittrich,et al.  Spatial Variability, Mean Drag Forces, and Drag Coefficients in an Array of Rigid Cylinders , 2011 .

[42]  Vladimir Nikora,et al.  The debate about drag and reconfiguration of freshwater macrophytes: comparing results obtained by three recently discussed approaches , 2006 .

[43]  Daniel M Tartakovsky,et al.  Elastic response of carbon nanotube forests to aerodynamic stresses. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[44]  F. Douglas Shields,et al.  Representation of Vegetation in Two-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Models , 2017 .

[45]  Wim S. J. Uijttewaal,et al.  Effects of vegetation on flow and sediment transport: comparative analyses and validation of predicting models , 2015 .

[46]  H. Takenaka,et al.  Estimation of drag coefficient of a real tree considering the vertical stand structure of trunk, branches, and leaves , 2011 .

[47]  Joel S. Weitzman,et al.  The attenuation of current‐ and wave‐driven flow within submerged multispecific vegetative canopies , 2015 .

[48]  Janusz Kubrak,et al.  Vertical velocity distributions through and above submerged, flexible vegetation , 2008 .

[49]  S. Emamgholizadeh,et al.  Drag coefficient of unsubmerged rigid vegetation stems in open channel flows , 2010 .

[50]  Allen Bateman,et al.  A new integrated, hydro-mechanical model applied to flexible vegetation in riverbeds , 2008 .

[51]  R. Hardy,et al.  The importance of accurately representing submerged vegetation morphology in the numerical prediction of complex river flow , 2016 .

[52]  Delft,et al.  A flume experiment on sediment transport with flexible, submerged vegetation , 2003 .

[53]  H. Rauch,et al.  Spatial–structural properties of woody riparian vegetation with a view to reconfiguration under hydrodynamic loading , 2015 .

[54]  Marco Ghisalberti,et al.  The limited growth of vegetated shear layers , 2004 .

[55]  Ilenia Battiato,et al.  Vertical dispersion in vegetated shear flows , 2016 .

[56]  V. Singh,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Influence of Vegetation on Flow Turbulence , 2015 .

[57]  J. Huba,et al.  Simulation of the seeding of equatorial spread F by circular gravity waves , 2013 .

[58]  Kenneth Pye,et al.  Flow Structure in and above the Various Heights of a Saltmarsh Canopy: A Laboratory Flume Study , 1995 .

[59]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[60]  Juha Järvelä,et al.  Flow resistance of flexible and stiff vegetation: a flume study with natural plants , 2002 .

[61]  Yukie Tanino,et al.  Laboratory Investigation of Mean Drag in a Random Array of Rigid, Emergent Cylinders , 2008 .

[62]  Stewart J. Clarke,et al.  Vegetation growth in rivers: influences upon sediment and nutrient dynamics , 2002 .

[63]  Iris Möller,et al.  A review of plant‐flow interactions on salt marshes: the importance of vegetation structure and plant mechanical characteristics , 2015 .

[64]  Flow–plant interactions at leaf, stem and shoot scales: drag, turbulence, and biomechanics , 2014, Aquatic Sciences.

[65]  Alexandre M. Tartakovsky,et al.  Dispersion controlled by permeable surfaces: surface properties and scaling , 2016, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[66]  Q. Chen,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of Unidirectional and Wave Flows through Vegetation , 2016 .

[67]  Luca Ridolfi,et al.  The Effect of Vegetation Density on Canopy Sub-Layer Turbulence , 2004 .

[68]  Aronne Armanini,et al.  Direct measurement of vegetation resistance in prototype scale , 2005 .

[69]  H. Nepf,et al.  Transport in aquatic canopies , 2007 .