Using Individual and Collaborative Challenges in Behavior Change Support Systems: Findings from a Two-Month Field Trial of a Trip Planner Application

Besides other popular strategies, such as feedback and (social) comparisons, challenges have been proposed and used to influence people’s behavior towards a targeted goal. However, only very limited data on the effectiveness of such approaches and how to best design them is available yet. In this work we report the findings of a two months field study analyzing the effectiveness and perception of challenges in the context of influencing personal mobility. Individual and collaborative approaches towards challenges were studied, and specific focus was laid on what aspect makes users willing to participate in these challenges. Our findings suggest that both individual and collaborative challenges have the potential to sustain the interest of users in using behavior change support systems, that collaborative and individual challenges seem to not attract different types of users, that individual challenges in general are preferred, and that challenges are only a useful means for a subset of users. Also, ICT-competence seems to be an important aspect of being willing to participate in electronically organized challenges.

[1]  Antti Jylhä,et al.  MatkaHupi: a persuasive mobile application for sustainable mobility , 2013, UbiComp.

[2]  David E. Goodrich,et al.  An Online Community Improves Adherence in an Internet-Mediated Walking Program. Part 1: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[3]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Motivating domestic energy conservation through comparative, community-based feedback in mobile and social media , 2011, C&T.

[4]  Antti Jylhä,et al.  Design challenges in motivating change for sustainable urban mobility , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Hu Cao,et al.  Tripzoom: an app to improve your mobility behavior , 2012, MUM.

[6]  Daniele Miorandi,et al.  SUPERHUB: a user-centric perspective on sustainable urban mobility , 2012, Sense Transport '12.

[7]  Privender Saini,et al.  Individual Differences in Persuadability in the Health Promotion Domain , 2010, PERSUASIVE.

[8]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[9]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Fish'n'Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game , 2006, UbiComp.

[10]  H. Staats,et al.  Effecting Durable Change , 2004 .

[11]  Marc Busch,et al.  Personalized Persuasive Technology - Development and Validation of Scales for Measuring Persuadability , 2013, PERSUASIVE.

[12]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Persuasive system design: state of the art and future directions , 2009, Persuasive '09.

[13]  Marc Busch,et al.  Peacox - Persuasive Advisor for CO2-Reducing Cross-Modal Trip Planning , 2013, PERSUASIVE.

[14]  James A. Landay,et al.  UbiGreen: investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits , 2009, CHI.

[15]  Anastasis D. Petrou Review of “Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do by B. J. Fogg” Morgan Kaufmann, 2003 , 2003 .

[16]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Influencing Individually: Fusing Personalization and Persuasion , 2012, TIIS.

[17]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[18]  Grace Skrzypiec,et al.  Environmental attitudes of senior secondary school students in South Australia , 1998 .

[19]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  The PerCues Framework and Its Application for Sustainable Mobility , 2007, PERSUASIVE.

[20]  Johann Schrammel,et al.  Watch your Emissions: Persuasive Strategies and Choice Architecture for Sustainable Decisions in Urban Mobility , 2014, PsychNology J..

[21]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Goal-setting considerations for persuasive technologies that encourage physical activity , 2009, Persuasive '09.

[22]  E. A. Locke,et al.  A theory of goal setting & task performance , 1990 .

[23]  Ina Wechsung,et al.  Assessing ICT user groups , 2012, NordiCHI.

[24]  Tammy Toscos,et al.  Chick clique: persuasive technology to motivate teenage girls to exercise , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[25]  James A. Landay,et al.  Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity , 2006, CHI.

[26]  Frédéric Thiesse,et al.  Motivating Energy-Efficient Behavior with Green IS: An Investigation of Goal Setting and the Role of Defaults , 2013, MIS Q..