Linking procedural memory with organizational learning through knowledge corridors

Purpose This paper argues that the combination of factors that facilitate focal and peripheral vision represent two distinct types of knowledge corridors. While focal vision may help detect signals that relate to the current objectives of the firm, peripheral vision is directed to non-central issues that may provide signals that relate to emerging trends in the external environment. Ambidexterity vision refers to the tension between these two different business visions within the same organization. This paper aims to examine the significance of procedural memory to an organization’s ambidexterity vision, along with investigating the impact procedural memory has on organizational learning. Design/methodology/approach The research conducted in this study addresses the following two questions: Does the enhancement of procedural memory result in the development of superior ambidexterity vision? Does the simultaneous development of both focal and peripheral vision enhance organizational learning? These research questions are studied by conducting an empirical investigation involving data provided by 203 banking employees. These data are analysed using a structural equation modelling approach. Findings Analysis of the data provides support for the existence of a relationship between ambidexterity vision and organizational learning. Practical implications The findings suggest that the re-direction of managers’ perceptions to supporting and enhancing an ambidexterity vision is likely to result in an improvement in their ability to identify emerging trends, new and emerging customers and potential shifts in customer needs and tastes. Originality/value This work suggests that the re-direction of managers’ perceptions to supporting and enhancing an ambidexterity vision is likely to result in an improvement in their ability to identify emerging trends, new and emerging customers and potential shifts in customer needs and tastes.

[1]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Senior Team Attributes and Organizational Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership , 2008 .

[2]  Konstantinos Kakavelakis A relational approach to understanding knowing in communities of practice , 2010 .

[3]  Robert Ronstadt,et al.  The Corridor Principle , 1988 .

[4]  George S. Day,et al.  Peripheral Vision: Detecting the Weak Signals That Will Make or Break Your Company , 2006 .

[5]  Pedro Soto-Acosta,et al.  New ICTs for Knowledge Management in Organizations , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[6]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future , 2013 .

[7]  M. Bouton Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: sources of relapse after behavioral extinction , 2002, Biological Psychiatry.

[8]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  The quality and effectiveness of marketing strategy: Effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict in intraorganizational relationships , 1996 .

[9]  Michael W. Kraus,et al.  The power to be me: Power elevates self-concept consistency and authenticity , 2011 .

[10]  P. Beike The Competitive Ethos And Democratic Education , 2016 .

[11]  Patrocinio Zaragoza-Sáez,et al.  Relational capital inside multinationals , 2011 .

[12]  Silvia Martelo-Landroguez,et al.  Linking knowledge corridors to customer value through knowledge processes , 2014, J. Knowl. Manag..

[13]  Vladimir Stantchev,et al.  Innovation Strategy : Managing the implementation communication and its generated knowledge through the use of an ICT Tool , 2016 .

[14]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[15]  Victoria J. Marsick The Dimensions of a Learning Organization Questionnaire (DLOQ) , 2013 .

[16]  S. Shane Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[17]  A. Lewin,et al.  Co-evolutionary Dynamics Within and Between Firms: From Evolution to Co-evolution , 2003 .

[18]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[19]  Christopher L. Shook,et al.  The Concept of “Opportunity” in Entrepreneurship Research: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges , 2010 .

[20]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[21]  G. Day The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[22]  R. Sohi,et al.  IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? , 2003 .

[23]  S. Haeckel Peripheral Vision: Sensing and Acting on Weak Signals: Making Meaning out of Apparent Noise: The Need for a New Managerial Framework , 2004 .

[24]  Esra Dinç Perceived Organizational Support as a Mediator of the Relationship between Effort-Reward Fairness, Affective Commitment, and Intention to Leave , 2015 .

[25]  David P Mackinnon,et al.  Explanation of Two Anomalous Results in Statistical Mediation Analysis , 2012, Multivariate behavioral research.

[26]  George S. Day,et al.  Peripheral Vision: Sensing and Acting on Weak Signals , 2004 .

[27]  I. W. Zartman Looking forward and looking backward on negotiation theory , 2005 .

[28]  Pierre-Majorique Léger,et al.  Interorganizational IT investments and the value upstream relational capital , 2010 .

[29]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[30]  Ettore Bolisani,et al.  Factors affecting the use of wiki to manage knowledge in a small company , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[31]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Reliability and Validity Assessment , 1979 .

[32]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[33]  J. Barney,et al.  Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? , 1986 .

[34]  Juan-Gabriel Cegarra-Navarro,et al.  Individual Knowledge as a Bridge between Human and Customer Capital , 2003, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[35]  Maria Rosaria Della Peruta,et al.  The impact of IT-based knowledge management systems on internal venturing and innovation: a structural equation modeling approach to corporate performance , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[36]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[37]  Toby Marshall Egan,et al.  The effects of organizational learning culture and job satisfaction on motivation to transfer learning and turnover intention , 2004 .

[38]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[39]  Karen E. Watkins,et al.  The Dimensions of the Learning Organization Questionnaire (the DLOQ) , 2013 .

[40]  S Mackenzie,et al.  Surveying the organizational culture in an NHS trust. , 1995, Journal of management in medicine.

[41]  N. Smith,et al.  The New Marketing Myopia , 2010 .

[42]  I. Quirós,et al.  Hacia Unos Valores Culturales Más Eficaces: El Papel De La Estrategia En La Consecución De Mejores Resultados / Towards The Most Efficient Organizational Values: The Role Of Organizational Strategy To Get Better Results , 2009 .

[43]  William A. Sherden,et al.  Market ownership : the art & science of becoming #1 , 1994 .

[44]  Robert A. Burgelman Strategy as Vector and the Inertia of Coevolutionary Lock-in , 2002 .

[45]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[46]  Frank W. Dewhurst,et al.  Linking organizational learning and customer capital through an ambidexterity context: an empirical investigation in SMEs1 , 2007 .

[47]  Ankit Mathur,et al.  Pupil shape as viewed along the horizontal visual field. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[48]  Nachoem Wijnberg,et al.  Organizational Memory: From Expectations Memory to Procedural Memory , 2009 .

[49]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[50]  P. Dorfman,et al.  UNDERSTANDING CULTURES AND IMPLICIT LEADERSHIP THEORIES ACROSS THE GLOBE: AN INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT GLOBE , 2002 .

[51]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[52]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Organizational Routines Are Stored as Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study , 1994 .

[53]  Thomas J. Chermack,et al.  The Dimensions of Learning Organization Questionnaire (DLOQ): A validation study in a Korean context , 2009 .

[54]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice , 1995 .

[55]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. , 2014, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[56]  John Nicholls,et al.  The Strategic Leadership Star , 1994 .

[57]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[58]  S. Macstravic Marketing myopia. , 1998, The Healthcare Forum journal.

[59]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[60]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Assessing the role of knowledge management capability and environmental dynamism in SMEs , 2017 .

[61]  A. García-Pérez,et al.  Linking peripheral vision with relational capital through knowledge structures , 2016 .

[62]  John R. Anderson A Spreading Activation Theory of Memory , 1988 .

[63]  Robert Chia,et al.  Using Teams to Avoid Peripheral Blindness , 2007 .

[64]  Anil Menon,et al.  A Model of Marketing Knowledge use within Firms , 1992 .

[65]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS, CONSEQUENCES AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[66]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Editorial - Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance , 2013 .

[67]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory , 1998 .

[68]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[69]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experiential Search , 2000 .

[70]  N. Krueger The Cognitive Infrastructure of Opportunity Emergence , 2000 .

[71]  N. Fairclough Peripheral Vision , 2005 .

[72]  Michael Scharkow,et al.  The Relative Trustworthiness of Inferential Tests of the Indirect Effect in Statistical Mediation Analysis , 2013, Psychological science.

[73]  Cinzia Daraio,et al.  Exploring gender differences in patenting in Spain , 2014 .

[74]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[75]  J. Cegarra-Navarro,et al.  The Effect of Absorptive Capacity on Innovativeness: Context and Information Systems Capability as Catalysts , 2010 .

[76]  Wynne W. Chin How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses , 2010 .