Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial.

[1]  R. Kusy,et al.  Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[2]  K. Ison,et al.  Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires in the buccal segments. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[3]  N. Harradine,et al.  Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. , 2008, Clinical orthodontics and research.

[4]  M. Sherriff,et al.  Perception of discomfort during initial orthodontic tooth alignment using a self-ligating or conventional bracket system: a randomized clinical trial. , 2008, European journal of orthodontics.

[5]  N. Pandis,et al.  Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  K. Loh Rapid tooth movement with a low-force, low-friction bracket system. , 2007, Journal of clinical orthodontics.

[7]  D. Birnie,et al.  Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[8]  J. Sandler,et al.  Which orthodontic archwire sequence? A randomized clinical trial. , 2006, European journal of orthodontics.

[9]  N. Pandis,et al.  Maxillary incisor torque with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a prospective clinical trial. , 2006, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[10]  R. Weyant,et al.  A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. , 2006, The Angle orthodontist.

[11]  P. Miles SmartClip versus conventional twin brackets for initial alignment: is there a difference? , 2005, Australian orthodontic journal.

[12]  D. Millett,et al.  Evaluation of methods of archwire ligation on frictional resistance. , 2004, European journal of orthodontics.

[13]  S. Straja,et al.  Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. , 2001, Clinical orthodontics and research.

[14]  R P Kusy,et al.  Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  D. Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. , 2001, Annals of internal medicine.

[16]  D. Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials , 2001, The Lancet.

[17]  P. Major,et al.  The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[18]  Damon Dh The Damon low-friction bracket: a biologically compatible straight-wire system. , 1998 .

[19]  Damon Dh The rationale, evolution and clinical application of the self-ligating bracket. , 1998 .

[20]  W. Proffit,et al.  Efficiency of multi-strand steel, superelastic Ni-Ti and ion-implanted Ni-Ti archwires for initial alignment. , 1998, Clinical orthodontics and research.

[21]  R G Newcombe,et al.  Clinical comparison and performance perspective of three aligning arch wires. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[22]  B. Melsen,et al.  Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets. , 1998, European journal of orthodontics.

[23]  S. Jones,et al.  A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems. , 1997, British journal of orthodontics.

[24]  R. Newcombe,et al.  Multiflex versus superelastic: a randomized clinical trial of the tooth alignment ability of initial arch wires. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[25]  J R Sandy,et al.  Recent advances in understanding mechanically induced bone remodeling and their relevance to orthodontic theory and practice. , 1993, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[26]  F. Mcdonald,et al.  Effect of bracket and wire composition on frictional forces. , 1991, European journal of orthodontics.

[27]  W. Shaw,et al.  A clinical trial of aligning archwires. , 1990, European journal of orthodontics.

[28]  D C Tidy,et al.  Frictional forces in fixed appliances. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[29]  J. Årtun,et al.  Long-term evaluation of root resorption occurring during orthodontic treatment. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[30]  S. Wilson,et al.  Perception of discomfort by patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[31]  P. Ngan,et al.  Time course of the discomfort in young patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. , 1989, Pediatric dentistry.

[32]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[33]  D. Altman Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample? , 1980, British medical journal.

[34]  R. M. Little,et al.  The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. , 1975, American journal of orthodontics.

[35]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[36]  Christoph Bourauel,et al.  The influence of bracket design on frictional losses in the bracket/arch wire system , 2005, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[37]  L. Linge,et al.  Patient characteristics and treatment variables associated with apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment. , 1991, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.