A probabilistic approach to default reasoning

A logic is defined which in addition to propositional calculus contains several types of probabilistic operators which are applied only to propositional formulas. For every s ∈ S, where S is the unit interval of a recursive nonarchimedean field, an unary operator P≥s(α) and binary operators CP=s(α, β) and CP≥s(α, β) (with the intended meaning ”the probability of α is at least s”, ”the conditional probability of α given β is s, and ”the conditional probability of α given β is at least s”, respectively) are introduced. Since S is a non-archimedean field, we can also introduce a binary operator CP≈1(α, β) with the intended meaning ”probabilities of α ∧ β and β are infinitely close”. Possible-world semantics with a probability measure on an algebra of subsets of the set of all possible worlds is provided. A simple set of axioms is given but some of the rules of inference are infinitary. As a result we can prove the strong completeness theorem for our logic. Formulas of the form CP≈1(α, β) can be used to model default statements. We discuss some properties of the corresponding default entailment. We show that, if the language of defaults is considered, for every finite default base our default consequence relation coincides with the system P. If we allow arbitrary default bases, our system is more expressive than P. Finally, we analyze properties of the default consequence relation when we consider the full logic with negated defaults, imprecise observation etc.

[1]  Joseph Y. Halpern,et al.  From Statistical Knowledge Bases to Degrees of Belief , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[2]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  Reasoning about knowledge and probability , 1988, JACM.

[3]  Ken Satoh A Probabilistic Interpretation for Lazy Nonmonotonic Reasoning , 1990, AAAI.

[4]  Daniel Lehmann,et al.  What does a Conditional Knowledge Base Entail? , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[5]  H. Keisler Elementary Calculus: An Infinitesimal Approach , 1976 .

[6]  Miodrag Raskovic,et al.  Completeness theorem for propositional probabilistic models whose measures have only finite ranges , 2004, Arch. Math. Log..

[7]  Miodrag Raskovic,et al.  Some first-order probability logics , 2000, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[8]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Qualitative Probabilities for Default Reasoning, Belief Revision, and Causal Modeling , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[9]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Preferential Models and Cumulative Logics , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[10]  Joseph Y. Halpern,et al.  Plausibility measures and default reasoning , 1996, JACM.

[11]  John P. Burgess,et al.  Quick completeness proofs for some logics of conditionals , 1981, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[12]  Natasha Alechina,et al.  Logic with Probabilistic Operators , 1995 .

[13]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  A logic for reasoning about probabilities , 1988, [1988] Proceedings. Third Annual Information Symposium on Logic in Computer Science.

[14]  Miodrag Raskovic,et al.  A probabilistic extension of intuitionistic logic , 2003, Math. Log. Q..

[15]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Conditional Objects and Possibility Theory , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[16]  W. Luxemburg Non-Standard Analysis , 1977 .

[17]  Alessandro Saffiotti,et al.  Belief functions and default reasoning , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[18]  Miodrag Raskovic,et al.  Some Probability Logics with New Types of Probability Operators , 1999, J. Log. Comput..