Public attitudes toward participation in cancer clinical trials.

PURPOSE The objective of this study is to understand the attitudes of American adults toward participation in cancer clinical trials. METHODS A national probability sample of 1,000 adults aged 18 and older living in noninstitutional settings was interviewed by telephone by Harris Interactive during March and April 2000. One participant was selected from each household selected for the study. The resulting data were weighted to reflect the full adult population of the United States as reported in Current Population Reports. An Index of Participation in a Cancer Clinical Trial was computed, using a confirmatory factor analysis and converting the factor scores into a 0-to-100 scale. RESULTS Approximately 32% of American adults (64 million individuals) indicate that they would be very willing to participate in a cancer clinical trial if asked to do so. An additional 38% of adults (76 million individuals) scored in a range that indicates that they are inclined to participate in a cancer clinical trial if asked, but hold some questions or reservations about participation. Projected rates of diagnosis, eligibility, and recruitment indicate that substantially more patients are willing to participate than are actually accrued. CONCLUSION These results indicate that the primary problem with accrual is not the attitudes of patients, but rather that the loss of potential participants is the result of the unavailability of an appropriate clinical trial and the disqualification of large numbers of patients. The pool of willing patients is further reduced by the reluctance of some physicians to engage in accrual.

[1]  P. Butow,et al.  Randomized clinical trials in oncology: understanding and attitudes predict willingness to participate. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  D. Gandara,et al.  Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Burnett Cb,et al.  Factors that influence a patient's decision to participate in a phase I cancer clinical trial. , 2000 .

[4]  J. Trauth,et al.  Public Attitudes Regarding Willingness to Participate in Medical Research Studies , 2000, Journal of health & social policy.

[5]  P M Ellis,et al.  Attitudes towards and participation in randomised clinical trials in oncology: a review of the literature. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[6]  N Colabianchi,et al.  Factors that predict the referral of breast cancer patients onto clinical trials by their surgeons and medical oncologists. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Kenneth N. Cissna,et al.  Patients' Perceptions of Physicians Communication and Outcomes of the Accrual to Trial Process , 2000, Health communication.

[8]  C. Coltman,et al.  Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  R. Prescott,et al.  Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  C. Klabunde,et al.  Factors influencing enrollment in clinical trials for cancer treatment. , 1999, Southern medical journal.

[11]  M. Coovert,et al.  Strategic physician communication and oncology clinical trials. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  S. Vernon,et al.  The effect of physician recommendation on enrollment in the Breast Cancer Chemoprevention Trial. , 1998, Preventive medicine.

[13]  L. Yoder,et al.  Expectations and experiences of patients with cancer participating in phase I clinical trials. , 1997, Oncology nursing forum.

[14]  B. Rimer,et al.  Participation in a women's breast cancer risk counseling trial: Who participates? Who declines? , 1996, Cancer.

[15]  S L George,et al.  Reducing patient eligibility criteria in cancer clinical trials. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  B. Rimer,et al.  Recruiting high risk women into a breast cancer health promotion trial. , 1994, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[17]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[18]  P. Engstrom,et al.  Feasibility of a telephone survey to recruit health maintenance organization members into a tamoxifen chemoprevention trial. , 1992, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[19]  S. Piantadosi,et al.  Effect of patients' expectations of benefit with standard breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy on participation in a randomized clinical trial: a clinical vignette study. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  P. Ganz Clinical trials. Concerns of the patient and the public , 1990 .

[21]  L. Siminoff,et al.  Doctor-patient communication about breast cancer adjuvant therapy. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  C Loehlin John,et al.  Latent variable models: an introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis , 1986 .

[23]  C L Soskolne,et al.  Physicians' reasons for not entering eligible patients in a randomized clinical trial of surgery for breast cancer. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  D. J. Jackson,et al.  Factor Analysis and Measurement in Sociological Research. , 1983 .

[25]  E. Lusk,et al.  Attitudes toward clinical trials among patients and the public. , 1982, JAMA.

[26]  Linda G. Kimmel,et al.  Biomedical communications : purposes, audiences, and strategies , 2001 .

[27]  R. Prescott,et al.  Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. , 1999, Health technology assessment.

[28]  Jon D. Miller,et al.  Public perceptions of science and technology : a comparative study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada , 1997 .

[29]  L. Siminoff,et al.  Offering the option of randomized clinical trials to cancer patients who overestimate their prognoses with standard therapies. , 1993, Cancer investigation.

[30]  C. Gotay,et al.  Accrual to cancer clinical trials: directions from the research literature. , 1991, Social science & medicine.