Bias and prevalence effects on kappa viewed in terms of sensitivity and specificity.

[1]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[2]  W. Willett,et al.  Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic. , 1987, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  A. Feinstein,et al.  High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  A. Feinstein,et al.  High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  J. Carlin,et al.  Bias, prevalence and kappa. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  B Littenberg,et al.  A Meta-analytic Method for Summarizing Diagnostic Test Performances , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[7]  I. Guggenmoos‐Holzmann,et al.  How reliable are chance-corrected measures of agreement? , 1993, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  I. Guggenmoos‐Holzmann,et al.  The meaning of kappa: probabilistic concepts of reliability and validity revisited. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  C. Lantz,et al.  Behavior and interpretation of the κ statistic: Resolution of the two paradoxes , 1996 .

[10]  G. ter Riet,et al.  Pregnancy rate following normal versus abnormal hysterosalpingography findings: a meta-analysis. , 1997, Gynecologic and obstetric investigation.