Assessing the impact of a care innovation: telecare

The provision of health and social care for an increasing elderly population is a challenge facing many societies. Telecare, the delivery of health and social care to individuals within the home or wider community, with the support of information and communication technologies, has been advocated as an approach to reduce the rise in the number of elderly people in institutional care and to contain costs. A dynamic model is required to understand the systemic impact of telecare implementation over time. The paper cautions against overoptimistic expectations about the impact of telecare in the short term and emphasises that the benefits for healthcare systems may take a considerable time to be realised. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Robert Baldwin National Service Framework for Older People , 2003 .

[2]  J. Barlow,et al.  A systematic review of the benefits of home telecare for frail elderly people and those with long-term conditions , 2007, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[3]  J F Fries,et al.  Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  G. Doblhammer,et al.  Compression or expansion of morbidity? Trends in healthy-life expectancy in the elderly Austrian population between 1978 and 1998. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[5]  E Murphy,et al.  With respect to old age , 1999, BMJ.

[6]  T. Haslett,et al.  System dynamics and action research in aged care. , 2001, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[7]  B. Steen,et al.  The compression of morbidity debate in aging: an empirical test using the gerontological and geriatric population studies in Göteborg, Sweden (H70). , 2003, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[8]  Eric F. Wolstenholme A Case Study in Community Care Using Systems Thinking , 1993 .

[9]  Eric Wolstenholme,et al.  A patient flow perspective of U.K. health services: exploring the case for new “intermediate care” initiatives , 1999 .

[10]  A Allen,et al.  The potential for telemedicine in home nursing , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[11]  Where next for policy evaluation? Insights from researching National Health Service modernisation , 2003 .

[12]  Roush Re,et al.  Impact of a personal emergency response system on hospital utilization by community-residing elders. , 1995 .

[13]  E. Balas,et al.  Distance technologies for patient monitoring , 1999 .

[14]  J. Homer,et al.  Models for collaboration: how system dynamics helped a community organize cost‐effective care for chronic illness , 2004 .

[15]  E. Schneider,et al.  Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity: another view. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Ann Netten,et al.  Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2002 , 2000 .

[17]  Jack Homer,et al.  Structure, Data, and Compelling Conclusions: Notes from the Field , 1997 .

[18]  Adelina Comas-Herrera,et al.  Demand for Long-term Care: Projections of Long-term Care Finance for Elderly People. , 1998 .

[19]  Jack Homer,et al.  Why we iterate: scientific modeling in theory and practice , 1996 .

[20]  J. Barlow,et al.  Flexible Homes, Flexible Care, Inflexible Organisations? The Role of Telecare in Supporting Independence , 2005 .