Human–AI resource relations in value cocreation in service ecosystems

PurposeApplications of artificial intelligence (AI), such as virtual and physical service robots, generative AI, large language models and decision support systems, alter the nature of services. Most service research centers on the division between human and AI resources. Less attention has been paid to analyzing the entangled resource relations and interactions between humans and AI entities. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to extend our metatheoretical understanding of resource integration and value cocreation by analyzing different human–AI resource relations in service ecosystems.Design/methodology/approachThe conceptual paper adapts a novel framework from postphenomenology, specifically cyborg intentionality. This framework is used to analyze what kinds of human–AI resource relations enable resource integration and value cocreation in service ecosystems.FindingsWe conceptualize seven different human–AI resource relations, namely background, embodiment, hermeneutic, alterity, cyborg, immersion and composite relation. The sociotechnical entangled perspective on human–AI resource relations challenges and reframes our understanding of interactions between humans and nonhumans in resource integration and value cocreation and the distinction between operant and operand resources in service research.Originality/valueOur primary contribution to researchers and service providers is dissolving the distinction between operant and operand resources. We present two foundational propositions. 1. Humans and AI become entangled value cocreating resources in inherently sociotechnical service ecosystems; and 2. Human and AI entanglements in value cocreation manifest through seven resource relations in inherently sociotechnical service ecosystems. Understanding the combinatorial potential of different human–AI resource relations enables service providers to make informed choices in service ecosystems.

[1]  Anu Helkkula,et al.  Imagining post-marketing: Neo-animist resource circulation and value cocreation , 2024, Journal of Business Research.

[2]  Moritz J. Kleinaltenkamp,et al.  Resource entanglement and indeterminacy: Advancing the service-dominant logic through the philosophy of Karen Barad , 2023, Marketing Theory.

[3]  Huseyin Gurkan,et al.  Is your Machine Better than You? You May Never Know , 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  Ruthanne Huising,et al.  Relational Expertise: What Machines Can’t Know , 2023, Journal of Management Studies.

[5]  Sandra Streukens,et al.  To automate or not to automate? A contingency approach to service automation , 2023, Journal of Service Management.

[6]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  “Collaborating” with AI: Taking a System View to Explore the Future of Work , 2023, Organization Science.

[7]  E. Arnould,et al.  Using neo-animism to revisit actors for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in S-D logic , 2022, Journal of Business Research.

[8]  Alok Gupta,et al.  Cognitive Challenges in Human-Artificial Intelligence Collaboration: Investigating the Path Toward Productive Delegation , 2021, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Stefanie Paluch,et al.  “My colleague is a robot” – exploring frontline employees' willingness to work with collaborative service robots , 2021, Journal of Service Management.

[10]  C. Mele,et al.  The architecture of the phygital customer journey: a dynamic interplay between systems of insights and systems of engagement , 2021, European Journal of Marketing.

[11]  Hila Lifshitz-Assaf,et al.  To engage or not to engage with AI for critical judgments: How professionals deal with opacity when using AI for medical diagnosis , 2021, Organization Science.

[12]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Service robots, agency and embarrassing service encounters , 2021, Journal of Service Management.

[13]  Balaji Padmanabhan,et al.  Editorial for the Special Section on Humans, Algorithms, and Augmented Intelligence: The Future of Work, Organizations, and Society , 2021, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Gerald C. Kane,et al.  Failures of Fairness in Automation Require a Deeper Understanding of Human-ML Augmentation , 2021, MIS Q..

[15]  D. Mahr,et al.  The service triad: an empirical study of service robots, customers and frontline employees , 2021, Journal of Service Management.

[16]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Service Robots, Agency, and Embarrassing Service Encounters , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  L. Meyer-Waarden,et al.  “Baby, you can drive my car”: Psychological antecedents that drive consumers’ adoption of AI-powered autonomous vehicles , 2021, Technovation.

[18]  Welf H. Weiger,et al.  Trust me, I'm a bot – repercussions of chatbot disclosure in different service frontline settings , 2021, Journal of Service Management.

[19]  Barbara Wasson,et al.  A Postphenomenological Framework for Studying User Experience of Immersive Virtual Reality , 2021, Frontiers in Virtual Reality.

[20]  Cristina Mele,et al.  Smart nudging: How cognitive technologies enable choice architectures for value co-creation , 2020 .

[21]  B. Edvardsson,et al.  Service Ecosystem Design: Propositions, Process Model, and Future Research Agenda , 2020, Journal of Service Research.

[22]  M. Sony,et al.  Industry 4.0 integration with socio-technical systems theory: A systematic review and proposed theoretical model , 2020 .

[23]  Elina Jaakkola,et al.  Designing conceptual articles: four approaches , 2020, AMS Review.

[24]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Humans and Technology: Forms of Conjoined Agency in Organizations , 2020, Academy of Management Review.

[25]  J. Kandampully,et al.  Frontline Service Technology infusion: conceptual archetypes and future research directions , 2019, Journal of Service Management.

[26]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Situating Humans, Technology and Materiality in Value Cocreation , 2018, Journal of Creating Value.

[27]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Brave new world: service robots in the frontline , 2018, Journal of Service Management.

[28]  P. Verbeek,et al.  Technological Environmentality: Conceptualizing Technology as a Mediating Milieu , 2018, Philosophy & Technology.

[29]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory Approach , 2018 .

[30]  B. Edvardsson,et al.  Motivation: The missing driver for theorizing about resource integration , 2018 .

[31]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Service , 2018 .

[32]  M. Akaka,et al.  Technology as an operant resource in service (eco)systems , 2014, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[33]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Value cocreation and service systems (Re)formation: A service ecosystems view , 2012 .

[34]  C. Kelleher,et al.  Characterizing Value as an Experience , 2012 .

[35]  G. Goeminne Postphenomenology and the Politics of Sustainable Technology , 2011 .

[36]  Francesco Polese,et al.  A Brief Review of Systems Theories and Their Managerial Applications , 2010 .

[37]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution , 2008 .

[38]  Gabrielle Durepos Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[39]  P. Verbeek Obstetric Ultrasound and the Technological Mediation of Morality: A Postphenomenological Analysis , 2008 .

[40]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  The service system is the basic abstraction of service science , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[41]  W. Orlikowski Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[42]  Andrew Pickering,et al.  The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[43]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[44]  R. Lusch,et al.  Understanding Resource Management: How to Deploy Your People, Products, and Processes for Maximum Productivity , 1994 .

[45]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Service Robots and the Future of Services , 2020 .

[46]  Bart Verheij,et al.  Artificial Intelligence , 2017, Communications in Computer and Information Science.

[47]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic , 2016 .

[48]  D. Ihde Postphenomenology: Essays in the Postmodern Context , 1993 .

[49]  M. Callon The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle , 1986 .

[50]  J. Benjamin Machine horizons: post-phenomenological AI studies , 2022 .