Energy Delivery Transaction Pricing for flexible electrical loads

Although coordinating flexible electrical loads is known to have a multitude of benefits in terms of costs and reliability, designing efficient methods to practically induce the desired behavior, such as pricing mechanisms, poses a challenging problem. In this paper, we propose Energy Delivery Transaction Pricing (EDTP), a pricing scheme for coordinated energy delivery to delay tolerant demands that provides efficient incentives for load participation and facilitates demand side cost-comfort optimization. Instead of directly pricing electric power, we first define an energy delivery transaction as the process of delivering a certain amount of energy by a deadline and then propose a method to dynamically price the transactions. This approach enables us to reflect the value of flexibility as well as distribution network congestion level in the prices and hence to the users. We present our method using a flexible load scheduling problem we studied before and show that pricing each transaction as its incremental cost on the energy delivery schedule achieves our objectives. We compare the performance of EDTP in terms of the total cost of energy delivery, network level effects and user acceptance versus conventional consumption and optimal opportunistic response to real-time prices at different distribution network congestion levels. Our results show that EDTP exhibits strong performance advantage especially at and below moderate congestion levels and offers an advantageous option for most users while observing reliability of the distribution system and offering substantial amounts of reserves.

[1]  Anthony Papavasiliou,et al.  Supplying renewable energy to deferrable loads: Algorithms and economic analysis , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[2]  D. Aigner,et al.  The Residential Electricity Time-of-Use Pricing Experiments: What Have We Learned? , 1985 .

[3]  Ross Baldick,et al.  On energy delivery to delay-averse flexible loads: Optimal algorithm, consumer value and network level impacts , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[4]  F. Wolak An Experimental Comparison of Critical Peak and Hourly Pricing: The PowerCentsDC Program* , 2010 .

[5]  Alexandros G. Dimakis,et al.  Efficient Algorithms for Renewable Energy Allocation to Delay Tolerant Consumers , 2010, 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications.

[6]  Michael C. Caramanis,et al.  Management of electric vehicle charging to mitigate renewable generation intermittency and distribution network congestion , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[7]  Michael C. Caramanis,et al.  Load Participation in Electricity Markets: Day-Ahead and Hour-Ahead Market Coupling with Wholesale/Transmission and Retail/Distribution Cost and Congestion Modeling , 2010, 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications.

[8]  Constantine Caramanis,et al.  Efficient Energy Delivery Management for PHEVs , 2010, 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications.

[9]  Hamed Mohsenian Rad,et al.  Optimal Residential Load Control With Price Prediction in Real-Time Electricity Pricing Environments , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[10]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic programming and optimal control, 3rd Edition , 2005 .

[11]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Two Volume Set , 1995 .