Does replacing coal with wood lower CO2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy

Bioenergy is booming as nations seek to cut their greenhouse gas emissions. The European Union declared biofuels to be carbon-neutral, triggering a surge in wood use. But do biofuels actually reduce emissions? A molecule of CO2 emitted today has the same impact on radiative forcing whether it comes from coal or biomass. Biofuels can only reduce atmospheric CO2 over time through post-harvest increases in net primary production (NPP). The climate impact of biofuels therefore depends on CO2 emissions from combustion of biofuels versus fossil fuels, the fate of the harvested land and dynamics of NPP. Here we develop a model for dynamic bioenergy lifecycle analysis. The model tracks carbon stocks and fluxes among the atmosphere, biomass, and soils, is extensible to multiple land types and regions, and runs in ≈1s, enabling rapid, interactive policy design and sensitivity testing. We simulate substitution of wood for coal in power generation, estimating the parameters governing NPP and other fluxes using data for forests in the eastern US and using published estimates for supply chain emissions. Because combustion and processing efficiencies for wood are less than coal, the immediate impact of substituting wood for coal is an increase in atmospheric CO2 relative to coal. The payback time for this carbon debt ranges from 44–104 years after clearcut, depending on forest type—assuming the land remains forest. Surprisingly, replanting hardwood forests with fast-growing pine plantations raises the CO2 impact of wood because the equilibrium carbon density of plantations is lower than natural forests. Further, projected growth in wood harvest for bioenergy would increase atmospheric CO2 for at least a century because new carbon debt continuously exceeds NPP. Assuming biofuels are carbon neutral may worsen irreversible impacts of climate change before benefits accrue. Instead, explicit dynamic models should be used to assess the climate impacts of biofuels.

[1]  T. Volk,et al.  Comment on ‘Does replacing coal with wood lower CO2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy’ , 2018, Environmental Research Letters.

[2]  D. Kammen,et al.  Europe’s renewable energy directive poised to harm global forests , 2018, Nature Communications.

[3]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  R. Vargas,et al.  Globally rising soil heterotrophic respiration over recent decades , 2018, Nature.

[5]  R. Houghton,et al.  Climate, economic, and environmental impacts of producing wood for bioenergy , 2018 .

[6]  R. Knutti,et al.  Focus on cumulative emissions, global carbon budgets and the implications for climate mitigation targets , 2018 .

[7]  S. Frey,et al.  Long-term pattern and magnitude of soil carbon feedback to the climate system in a warming world , 2017, Science.

[8]  H. Epstein,et al.  Vulnerability to forest loss through altered postfire recovery dynamics in a warming climate in the Klamath Mountains , 2017, Global change biology.

[9]  S. Rahmstorf,et al.  Three years to safeguard our climate , 2017, Nature.

[10]  H. Junginger,et al.  Global Wood Pellet Industry and Trade Study 2017 , 2017 .

[11]  Miroslav Svoboda,et al.  Forest disturbances under climate change. , 2017, Nature climate change.

[12]  S. Hamburg,et al.  Unmask temporal trade-offs in climate policy debates , 2017, Science.

[13]  D. Brack.  The Impacts of the Demand for Woody Biomass for Power and Heat on Climate and Forests , 2017 .

[14]  P. Bernier,et al.  Range and uncertainties in estimating delays in greenhouse gas mitigation potential of forest bioenergy sourced from Canadian forests , 2017 .

[15]  W. Cornwall.  Is wood a green source of energy? Scientists are divided , 2017 .

[16]  W. Salas,et al.  Attribution of net carbon change by disturbance type across forest lands of the conterminous United States , 2016, Carbon Balance and Management.

[17]  V. Brovkin,et al.  The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017 , 2016, Earth System Science Data.

[18]  D. Saah,et al.  A global meta‐analysis of forest bioenergy greenhouse gas emission accounting studies , 2016 .

[19]  Narasimhan K. Larkin,et al.  Climate change presents increased potential for very large fires in the contiguous United States , 2015 .

[20]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment , 2015 .

[21]  J. Randerson,et al.  Rate and velocity of climate change caused by cumulative carbon emissions , 2015 .

[22]  Carly Whittaker,et al.  How certain are greenhouse gas reductions from bioenergy? Life cycle assessment and uncertainty analysis of wood pellet-to-electricity supply chains from forest residues , 2015 .

[23]  C. Peng,et al.  A novel pathway of direct methane production and emission by eukaryotes including plants, animals and fungi: An overview , 2015 .

[24]  G. Landmann,et al.  Quantifying consequences of removing harvesting residues on forest soils and tree growth – A meta-analysis , 2015 .

[25]  R. Plevin,et al.  Do biofuel policies seek to cut emissions by cutting food? , 2015, Science.

[26]  D. M. Lawrence,et al.  Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback , 2014, Nature.

[27]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Maximum warming occurs about one decade after a carbon dioxide emission , 2014 .

[28]  P. Leturcq.  Wood preservation (carbon sequestration) or wood burning (fossil-fuel substitution), which is better for mitigating climate change? , 2014, Annals of Forest Science.

[29]  J. Shoemaker,et al.  Forest ecosystem changes from annual methane source to sink depending on late summer water balance , 2014 .

[30]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[31]  J. DeCicco.  Biofuel’s carbon balance: doubts, certainties and implications , 2013, Climatic Change.

[32]  L. Sokka,et al.  Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment – a review , 2013 .

[33]  Andrew Jones,et al.  Management flight simulators to support climate negotiations , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[34]  R. Knutti,et al.  Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections , 2013 .

[35]  D. Saah,et al.  Carbon Accounting for Woody Biomass from Massachusetts (USA) Managed Forests: A Framework for Determining the Temporal Impacts of Wood Biomass Energy on Atmospheric Greenhouse Gas Levels , 2013 .

[36]  M. Harmon,et al.  Carbon debt and carbon sequestration parity in forest bioenergy production , 2012 .

[37]  Ian G. Enting,et al.  Carbon dioxide and climate impulse response functions for the computation of greenhouse gas metrics:a multi-model analysis , 2012 .

[38]  J. Sterman,et al.  Climate Interactive: The C-ROADS Climate Policy Model , 2012 .

[39]  Richard York,et al.  Do alternative energy sources displace fossil fuels , 2012 .

[40]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Large‐scale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral , 2012 .

[41]  A. Ito,et al.  Use of a process-based model for assessing the methane budgets of global terrestrial ecosystems and evaluation of uncertainty , 2012 .

[42]  A. Thomson,et al.  The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .

[43]  W. Landman.  Climate change 2007: the physical science basis , 2010 .

[44]  S. Solomon,et al.  Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Dominik Röser,et al.  Sustainable utilisation of forest biomass for energy - possibilities and problems: policy, legislation, certification, and recommendations and guidelines in the Nordic, Baltic, and other European countries. , 2007 .

[46]  G. Likens,et al.  The Biogeochemistry of Carbon at Hubbard Brook , 2005 .

[47]  T. Miller,et al.  Methanogens in human and animal intestinal Tracts , 1986 .

[48]  F. J. Richards.  A Flexible Growth Function for Empirical Use , 1959 .

[49]  R. Mechler,et al.  Findings of the IPCC Special Report on the impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C and what this means for Europe : powerpoint , 2018 .

[50]  M. Ter-Mikaelian,et al.  The burning question: does forest bioenergy reduce carbon emissions? A review of common misconceptions about forest carbon accounting. , 2015 .

[51]  W. Cohen,et al.  The U.S. forest carbon accounting framework: stocks and stock change, 1990-2016 , 2015 .

[52]  Tim Cockerill,et al.  Life cycle GHG assessment of fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture and storage , 2008 .

[53]  R. Birdsey,et al.  Methods for calculating forest ecosystem and harvested carbon with standard estimates for forest types of the United States , 2006 .

[54]  J. Prins.  Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council , 2006 .

[55]  G. Likens,et al.  The biogeochemistry of carbon at , 2005 .

[56]  F. Wagner,et al.  Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry , 2003 .

[57]  G. Woodwell,et al.  Biotic Feedbacks in the Global Climatic System , 1994 .