HOW DIFFERENT TEAM DOWNSIZING APPROACHES INFLUENCE TEAM-LEVEL ADAPTATION AND PERFORMANCE

This study examined the relative effectiveness of three structural approaches to reducing team size. Seventy-one five-person teams engaged in a simulated interactive task in which the approach to downsizing was manipulated. Results suggest that the structural approaches to reducing team size differentially impact team performance, and this relationship is mediated by how and to what degree teams adapt their task-related behaviors. Moreover, results from this study emphasize the importance of team composition in cases of team downsizing. Specifically, emotional stability and extraversion can help mitigate the negative effects associated with reducing team size.

[1]  Y Shoda,et al.  Reconciling processing dynamics and personality dispositions. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  The Emergence of Norms in Competitive Decision-Making Groups. , 1985 .

[3]  J. Wagner.  Studies of Individualism-Collectivism: Effects on Cooperation in Groups , 1995 .

[4]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Backing up behaviors in teams: the role of personality and legitimacy of need. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  M R Louis,et al.  Surprise and sense making: what newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. , 1980, Administrative science quarterly.

[6]  William H. Glick,et al.  Organizational Change and Redesign: Ideas and Insights for Improving Performance , 1995 .

[7]  J. Hackman,et al.  Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions , 1970 .

[8]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[10]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Procedural Justice and Survivors Reactions to Job Layoffs , 1995 .

[11]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Structural contingency theory and individual differences: examination of external and internal person-team fit. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  J. Hackman,et al.  Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances , 2002 .

[13]  J. Brockner,et al.  The Influence of Prior Commitment to an Institution on Reactions to Perceived Unfairness: The Higher They Are, the Harder They Fall , 1992 .

[14]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  The structure of work: Job design and roles. , 1991 .

[15]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams : Much more than g , 1997 .

[16]  Gerald E. Ledford,et al.  A HIERARCHICAL CONSTRUCT OF SELF‐MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO QUALITY OF WORK LIFE AND PERCEIVED WORK GROUP EFFECTIVENESS , 1997 .

[17]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  Cooperation, Competition, and Team Performance: Toward a Contingency Approach , 2003 .

[18]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[19]  D. Scott DeRue,et al.  Event criticality, urgency, and duration: Understanding how events disrupt teams and influence team leader intervention , 2006 .

[20]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  The Development of an Intragroup Norm and the Effects of Interpersonal and Structural Challenges , 1991 .

[21]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[22]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Financial Consequences of Employment-Change Decisions in Major U.S. Corporations , 1997 .

[23]  R. Peterson,et al.  7. A contingent configuration approach to understanding the role of personality in organizational groups , 2001 .

[24]  Samuel Juni,et al.  Revised NEO personality inventory , 1995 .

[25]  D. Watson,et al.  Toward a consensual structure of mood. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  G. Stewart,et al.  Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: the role of personality. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  J. A. Lepine,et al.  Team adaptation and postchange performance: effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  R. Heslin.  PREDICTING GROUP TASK EFFECTIVENESS FROM MEMBER CHARACTERISTICS. , 1964, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  Aneil Mishra,et al.  Best practices in white-collar downsizing: managing contradictions , 1991 .

[30]  E. Ramsden.  Group Process and Productivity , 1973 .

[31]  P. Costa,et al.  Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[33]  R. Piedmont,et al.  The Revised NEO Personality Inventory , 1998 .

[34]  F. Morgeson.  The external leadership of self-managing teams: intervening in the context of novel and disruptive events. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  C. Maslach.  Job Burnout , 2003 .

[36]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments. , 1982 .

[37]  W. Mischel,et al.  A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. , 1995, Psychological review.

[38]  Seth A. Kaplan,et al.  The affective underpinnings of job perceptions and attitudes: a meta-analytic review and integration. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  A. Erez,et al.  EFFECTS OF ROTATED LEADERSHIP AND PEER EVALUATION ON THE FUNCTIONING AND EFFECTIVENESS OF SELF‐MANAGED TEAMS: A QUASI‐EXPERIMENT , 2002 .

[40]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  Cooperation, competition and team performance: Toward a contingency approach , 2002 .

[41]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[42]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  D. Watson,et al.  Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  P. Costa,et al.  Normal Personality Assessment in Clinical Practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. , 1992 .

[45]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. , 1998 .

[46]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[47]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .