Familiarity with Speech Affects Cortical Processing of Auditory Distance Cues and Increases Acuity

Several acoustic cues contribute to auditory distance estimation. Nonacoustic cues, including familiarity, may also play a role. We tested participants’ ability to distinguish the distances of acoustically similar sounds that differed in familiarity. Participants were better able to judge the distances of familiar sounds. Electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings collected while participants performed this auditory distance judgment task revealed that several cortical regions responded in different ways depending on sound familiarity. Surprisingly, these differences were observed in auditory cortical regions as well as other cortical regions distributed throughout both hemispheres. These data suggest that learning about subtle, distance-dependent variations in complex speech sounds involves processing in a broad cortical network that contributes both to speech recognition and to how spatial information is extracted from speech.

[1]  Eduardo Mercado,et al.  Multidimensional processing of dynamic sounds: more than meets the ear , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Lucas Spierer,et al.  The role of the right parietal cortex in sound localization: A chronometric single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  David Poeppel,et al.  Discrimination of speech stimuli based on neuronal response phase patterns depends on acoustics but not comprehension. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Scott Makeig,et al.  Information-based modeling of event-related brain dynamics. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[5]  W E Simpson,et al.  Head movement does not facilitate perception of the distance of a source of sound. , 1973, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  Joy Hirsch,et al.  Functional Specialization within the Medial Frontal Gyrus for Perceptual Go/No-Go Decisions Based on What, When, and Where Related Information: An fMRI Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  I. Nachshon CROSS-LANGUAGE DIFFERENCES IN DICHOTIC LISTENING* , 1986 .

[8]  John G. Neuhoff,et al.  Neural Processing of Auditory Looming in the Human Brain , 2002, Current Biology.

[9]  C M Krause,et al.  Relative alpha desynchronization and synchronization during speech perception. , 1997, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  S. Makeig Auditory event-related dynamics of the EEG spectrum and effects of exposure to tones. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  The right supratemporal plane hears the distance of objects: neuromagnetic correlates of virtual reality , 2003, Neuroreport.

[12]  A. Horn,et al.  Are Familiar Sounds Ranged More Accurately? , 1985, Perceptual and motor skills.

[13]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Imaging brain dynamics using independent component analysis , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[14]  K. Berger Some Factors in the Recognition of Timbre , 1964 .

[15]  Joseph M. Orr,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex makes 2 contributions to minimizing distraction. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Pavel Zahorik,et al.  Assessing auditory distance perception using virtual acoustics. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  J. Downar,et al.  A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Kaustubh Kalgaonkar,et al.  Talker-to-listener distance effects on speech production and perception. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Phase Patterns of Neuronal Responses Reliably Discriminate Speech in Human Auditory Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[20]  A. Bronkhorst,et al.  Auditory distance perception in humans : A summary of past and present research , 2005 .

[21]  M. Rosenzweig Auditory localization. , 1961, Scientific American.

[22]  S Makeig,et al.  Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  D. Brungart,et al.  The effects of production and presentation level on the auditory distance perception of speech. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  P. Coleman Failure to Localize the Source Distance of an Unfamiliar Sound , 1962 .

[25]  C. Honey,et al.  Topographic Mapping of a Hierarchy of Temporal Receptive Windows Using a Narrated Story , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Pavel Zahorik,et al.  Direct-to-reverberant energy ratio sensitivity. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  P. Coleman An analysis of cues to auditory depth perception in free space. , 1963, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[29]  S. Makeig,et al.  Mining event-related brain dynamics , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB, SIFT, NFT, BCILAB, and ERICA: New Tools for Advanced EEG Processing , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[31]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The cortical organization of speech processing , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  D. Moore,et al.  Auditory Neuroscience: The Salience of Looming Sounds , 2003, Current Biology.

[33]  David J. Ostry,et al.  Auditory plasticity and speech motor learning , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  G. Buzsáki The "where is it?" reflex: autoshaping the orienting response. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[35]  B. Renault,et al.  Functional Anatomy of Human Auditory Attention Studied with PET , 1997, NeuroImage.

[36]  I. Peretz,et al.  Role of Familiarity in Auditory Discrimination of Musical Instrument: A Laterality Study , 1997, Cortex.

[37]  M. Woldorff,et al.  The neural circuitry underlying the executive control of auditory spatial attention , 2007, Brain Research.

[38]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  Frontal midline EEG dynamics during working memory , 2005, NeuroImage.