Genotype-by-region interactions of released sugarcane varieties for cane yield in the South African sugar industry

ABSTRACT Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) yields in the South African sugar industry are affected largely by genotype by environment (G × E) interactions. The objectives of this study were to investigate the nature and magnitude of G × E interactions of selected sugarcane genotypes based on regional evaluation trials and to identify mega-environments to inform future testing strategies. The study was conducted across five regions in KwaZulu-Natal province. Ten sugarcane hybrids and one commercial check hybrid were evaluated using a randomized complete block design with four replications. Data collected were analyzed using the additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI 2) and genotype main effect plus genotype by environment interaction (GGE) bi-plot analyses. A combined analysis of variance detected significant variation for genotypes, locations, and crop year and their interactions for total cane yield, estimated recoverable crystal and sugar yield. Genotypes N19 and N40 showed broad adaptability for cane and sugar yields, whereas N51 and N12 were superior for sucrose percentage. High cane yields were achieved in the following environments: South Coast, North Coast, Hinterland and irrigated North regions. Overall, the Irrigated North region was the most suitable environment for discriminating among cultivars and for being a representative test environment. Two mega-environments (MGE) were identified for the industry; where Midland and Hinterland sites fell in the same MGE 1; and North Coast, South Coast, and Irrigated North were combined into MGE 2.

[1]  Ravinder Kumar,et al.  Genotypes x environment interactions and stability analysis of sugarcane clones (Saccharum spp.) by AMMI model in sub-tropical regions of India , 2017 .

[2]  Manjit S. Kang,et al.  GGE Biplot Analysis for Cane and Sugar Yield from Advanced-Stage Sugarcane Trials in Subtropical India , 2014 .

[3]  H. Gauch A Simple Protocol for AMMI Analysis of Yield Trials , 2013 .

[4]  R. Oliveira,et al.  Evaluation of sugarcane genotypes and production environments in Paraná by GGE biplot and AMMI analysis , 2013 .

[5]  Luís Cláudio Inácio da Silveira,et al.  AMMI analysis to evaluate the adaptability and phenotypic stability of sugarcane genotypes , 2013 .

[6]  Sawan Preet Singh BIPLOT ANALYSIS FOR ESTIMATION OF GENOTYPE X ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION IN ADVANCE SUGARCANE GENOTYPES , 2013 .

[7]  M. Labuschagne,et al.  Investigating test site similarity, trait relations and causes of genotype × environment interactions of sugarcane in the Midlands region of South Africa , 2012 .

[8]  M. Labuschagne,et al.  Interpretation of genotype × environment interactions of sugarcane: Identifying significant environmental factors , 2011 .

[9]  Yan Weikai GGE biplot vs. AMMI graphs for genotype-by-environment data analysis. , 2011 .

[10]  M. Zhou,et al.  Genotype × environment interactions and resource allocation in sugarcane yield trials in the Rio Grande Valley region of Texas. , 2009 .

[11]  N. Sabaghnia,et al.  The use of an AMMI model and its parameters to analyse yield stability in multi-environment trials , 2008, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[12]  L. Soler,et al.  Impact of sugarcane supply scheduling on mill sugar production: A South African case study , 2008 .

[13]  Manjit S. Kang,et al.  GGE Biplot vs. AMMI Analysis of Genotype-by-Environment Data , 2007 .

[14]  J. Shine,et al.  The effect of genotype, environment and time of harvest on sugarcane yields in Florida, USA , 2006 .

[15]  Manjit S. Kang,et al.  GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists , 2002 .

[16]  Weikai Yan,et al.  Biplot Analysis of Test Sites and Trait Relations of Soybean in Ontario. , 2002, Crop science.

[17]  Weikai Yan GGEbiplot—A Windows Application for Graphical Analysis of Multienvironment Trial Data and Other Types of Two-Way Data , 2001 .

[18]  Weikai Yan,et al.  Cultivar Evaluation and Mega‐Environment Investigation Based on the GGE Biplot , 2000 .

[19]  J. Purchase,et al.  Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: II. Stability analysis of yield performance , 2000 .

[20]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Modelling sugarcane production systems I. Development and performance of the sugarcane module , 1999 .

[21]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes , 1997 .

[22]  C. Kessel,et al.  Genotype × Environment Interaction for Carbon Isotope Discrimination in Spring Wheat , 1997 .

[23]  H. Gauch,et al.  Optimal Replication in Selection Experiments , 1996 .

[24]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Statistical analysis of regional yield trials: AMMI analysis of factorial designs. , 1992 .