Prior and Present Evidence: How Prior Experience Interacts with Present Information in a Perceptual Decision Making Task

Background Vibrotactile discrimination tasks have been used to examine decision making processes in the presence of perceptual uncertainty, induced by barely discernible frequency differences between paired stimuli or by the presence of embedded noise. One lesser known property of such tasks is that decisions made on a single trial may be biased by information from prior trials. An example is the time-order effect whereby the presentation order of paired stimuli may introduce differences in accuracy. Subjects perform better when the first stimulus lies between the second stimulus and the global mean of all stimuli on the judged dimension (“preferred” time-orders) compared to the alternative presentation order (“nonpreferred” time-orders). This has been conceptualised as a “drift” of the first stimulus representation towards the global mean of the stimulus-set (an internal standard). We describe the influence of prior information in relation to the more traditionally studied factors of interest in a classic discrimination task. Methodology Sixty subjects performed a vibrotactile discrimination task with different levels of uncertainty parametrically induced by increasing task difficulty, aperiodic stimulus noise, and changing the task instructions whilst maintaining identical stimulus properties (the “context”). Principal Findings The time-order effect had a greater influence on task performance than two of the explicit factors–task difficulty and noise–but not context. The influence of prior information increased with the distance of the first stimulus from the global mean, suggesting that the “drift” velocity of the first stimulus towards the global mean representation was greater for these trials. Conclusions/Significance Awareness of the time-order effect and prior information in general is essential when studying perceptual decision making tasks. Implicit mechanisms may have a greater influence than the explicit factors under study. It also affords valuable insights into basic mechanisms of information accumulation, storage, sensory weighting, and processing in neural circuits.

[1]  R. Veit,et al.  BOLD adaptation in vibrotactile stimulation: neuronal networks involved in frequency discrimination. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Neural Coding of Tactile Decisions in the Human Prefrontal Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  S. McKee,et al.  The use of an implicit standard for measuring discrimination thresholds , 2000, Vision Research.

[4]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[5]  J J Zwislocki,et al.  On a psychophysical transformed-rule up and down method converging on a 75% level of correct responses , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  R. Romo,et al.  Neural codes for perceptual discrimination in primary somatosensory cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  R. Romo,et al.  Timing and neural encoding of somatosensory parametric working memory in macaque prefrontal cortex. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  D G Jamieson,et al.  On a bias induced by the provision of feedback in psychophysical experiments. , 1976, Acta psychologica.

[9]  Srikantan S. Nagarajan,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of the Time-order Error: An MEG Study , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  M. García-Pérez,et al.  A model for the time-order error in contrast discrimination , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Å. Hellström Time errors and differential sensation weighting. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  L. Postman,et al.  The time-error in auditory perception. , 1946, The American journal of psychology.

[13]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Exploring the cortical evidence of a sensory-discrimination process. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  R. Romo,et al.  Neuronal correlates of sensory discrimination in the somatosensory cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  R. Romo,et al.  Correlated Neuronal Discharges that Increase Coding Efficiency during Perceptual Discrimination , 2003, Neuron.

[16]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[17]  D. Jamieson,et al.  Presentation order effects in duration discrimination , 1975 .

[18]  H. Burton,et al.  Discrimination of vibrotactile frequencies in a delayed pair comparison task , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  R. Romo,et al.  Analysing neuronal correlates of the comparison of two sequentially presented sensory stimuli. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Factors Affecting Frequency Discrimination of Vibrotactile Stimuli: Implications for Cortical Encoding , 2006, PloS one.

[21]  Å. Hellström,et al.  Sensation weighting in comparison and discrimination of heaviness. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Observing the Observer (II): Deciding When to Decide , 2010, PloS one.

[23]  R. Romo,et al.  Decoding the temporal evolution of a simple perceptual act. , 2006, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[24]  R. Romo,et al.  Periodicity and Firing Rate As Candidate Neural Codes for the Frequency of Vibrotactile Stimuli , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Fred Tam,et al.  Functional MRI of working memory and selective attention in vibrotactile frequency discrimination , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[26]  H. Woodrow The effect of practice upon time-order errors in the comparison of temporal intervals. , 1935 .

[27]  W. McIlroy,et al.  Novel vibrotactile discrimination task for investigating the neural correlates of short-term learning with fMRI , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[28]  Ake Hellstrom,et al.  The time-order error and its relatives: Mirrors of cognitive processes in comparing. , 1985 .

[29]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Transient Storage of a Tactile Memory Trace in Primary Somatosensory Cortex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Neural Correlates of Vibrotactile Working Memory in the Human Brain , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Donald G. Jamieson,et al.  Pairing effects and time-order errors in duration discrimination , 1975 .

[32]  C. Gardiner Stochastic Methods: A Handbook for the Natural and Social Sciences , 2009 .

[33]  J. G. Needham The time-error in comparison judgments. , 1934 .

[34]  F. Blankenburg,et al.  Causal Role of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Human Perceptual Decision Making , 2011, Current Biology.

[35]  J. P. Frankmann,et al.  Theories of vigilance. , 1962 .

[36]  H. Woodrow Weight-Discrimination with a Varying Standard , 1933 .

[37]  Timothy D. Hanks,et al.  Elapsed Decision Time Affects the Weighting of Prior Probability in a Perceptual Decision Task , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Hauke R. Heekeren,et al.  Prior Information Biases Stimulus Representations during Vibrotactile Decision Making , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[40]  R. Romo,et al.  Decoding a Perceptual Decision Process across Cortex , 2010, Neuron.

[41]  Å. Hellström Comparison is not just subtraction: Effects of time- and space-order on subjective stimulus difference , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  E. Arabzadeh,et al.  A comparison of neuronal and behavioral detection and discrimination performances in rat whisker system. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  Thomas H Rammsayer,et al.  Effects of time-order, interstimulus interval, and feedback in duration discrimination of noise bursts in the 50- and 1000-ms ranges. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[44]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.

[45]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Discrimination in the Sense of Flutter: New Psychophysical Measurements in Monkeys , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  H. Helson,et al.  A quantitative theory of time-order effects. , 1954, American Journal of Psychology.

[47]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[48]  Xiao-Jing Wang Decision Making in Recurrent Neuronal Circuits , 2008, Neuron.

[49]  T. Gerdjikov,et al.  Discrimination of Vibrotactile Stimuli in the Rat Whisker System: Behavior and Neurometrics , 2010, Neuron.