Current Landscape of Breast Cancer Imaging and Potential Quantitative Imaging Markers of Response in ER-Positive Breast Cancers Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy
暂无分享,去创建一个
L. V. van't Veer | L. Esserman | N. Hylton | R. Freimanis | A. Chien | B. Joe | E. Jones | D. Hathi | R. Mukhtar | L. V. van‘t Veer | L. V. van’t Veer | A. J. Chien | Deep K. Hathi
[1] K. Hess,et al. Neoadjuvant Talazoparib for Patients With Operable Breast Cancer With a Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variant. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[2] Leah C Henze Bancroft,et al. Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: A comprehensive review , 2020, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[3] L. Esserman,et al. Additive value of diffusion‐weighted MRI in the I‐SPY 2 TRIAL , 2019, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[4] K. Pinker,et al. Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients with Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Provides Early Prediction of Pathological Response – A Prospective Study , 2019, Scientific Reports.
[5] Colin A. Purdie,et al. Are baseline ultrasound and mammographic features associated with rates of pathological completes response in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer? , 2019, Cancer Imaging.
[6] Shou‐Tung Chen,et al. Higher underestimation of tumour size post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy with breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—A concordance comparison cohort analysis , 2019, PloS one.
[7] V. Brouste,et al. Residual cancer burden index and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte subtypes in triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2019, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[8] Eric A. Cohen,et al. Prediction of Treatment Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer via Early Changes in Tumor Heterogeneity Captured by DCE-MRI Registration , 2019, Scientific Reports.
[9] Sharbell Y. Hashoul,et al. Practical uses of contrast‐enhanced spectral mammography in daily work: A pictorial review , 2019, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.
[10] U. Haberkorn,et al. Targeting of activated fibroblasts for imaging and therapy , 2019, EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry.
[11] Jiang Daqing,et al. Meta-Analysis of Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for the Assessment of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer , 2019, The American surgeon.
[12] R. Barzilay,et al. A Deep Learning Mammography-based Model for Improved Breast Cancer Risk Prediction. , 2019, Radiology.
[13] L. Esserman,et al. Initial experience of dedicated breast PET imaging of ER+ breast cancers using [F-18]fluoroestradiol , 2019, npj Breast Cancer.
[14] Frederik L. Giesel,et al. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Tracer Uptake in 28 Different Kinds of Cancer , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[15] L. Kooreman,et al. Does the subtype of breast cancer affect the diagnostic performance of axillary ultrasound for nodal staging in breast cancer patients? , 2019, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.
[16] Li Li,et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluating the pathologic response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2019, Medicine.
[17] Li Shen,et al. Deep Learning to Improve Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammography , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[18] R. Barzilay,et al. Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: Clinical Implementation. , 2019, Radiology.
[19] A. Vincent-Salomon,et al. Letrozole and palbociclib versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy of high-risk luminal breast cancer , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[20] H. Kim,et al. Comparison of mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, automated breast ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2018, European journal of radiology.
[21] Zheng Zhang,et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI Findings Predict Pathologic Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer: The ACRIN 6698 Multicenter Trial. , 2018, Radiology.
[22] W. Moon,et al. Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI for Evaluating Residual Tumor Size after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. , 2018, Radiology.
[23] John M S Bartlett,et al. An international multicenter study to evaluate reproducibility of automated scoring for assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer , 2018, Modern Pathology.
[24] Jennifer D. Brooks,et al. Histopathologic characteristics of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on breast MRI , 2018, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[25] Frederik L. Giesel,et al. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Biodistribution and Preliminary Dosimetry Estimate of 2 DOTA-Containing FAP-Targeting Agents in Patients with Various Cancers , 2018, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[26] J. James,et al. Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) , 2014 .
[27] B. Pockaj,et al. Breast MRI phenotype and background parenchymal enhancement may predict tumor response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy , 2018, The breast journal.
[28] C. Perou,et al. Pathological Response and Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Carboplatin plus Docetaxel , 2018, Clinical Cancer Research.
[29] S. Rashmi,et al. Predicting the molecular subtype of breast cancer based on mammography and ultrasound findings , 2018, Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging.
[30] Weijun Peng,et al. Decreased background parenchymal enhancement of the contralateral breast after two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with tumor response in HER2-positive breast cancer , 2018, Acta radiologica.
[31] B. Kang,et al. Pretreatment prediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Perfusion metrics of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[32] H. Kim,et al. Relationship between background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI and pathological tumor response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2018, The British journal of radiology.
[33] C. Gross,et al. Early adoption of digital breast tomosynthesis in the United States. , 2018 .
[34] E. Puré,et al. Pro-tumorigenic roles of fibroblast activation protein in cancer: back to the basics , 2018, Oncogene.
[35] Vivek Verma,et al. Response rates and pathologic complete response by breast cancer molecular subtype following neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2018, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[36] Matthew F. Covington,et al. Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography is Comparable to MRI in the Assessment of Residual Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy , 2018, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[37] T. Yamanaka,et al. Impact of clinical response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy on patient outcomes: a follow-up study of JFMC34-0601 multicentre prospective neoadjuvant endocrine trial , 2018, ESMO Open.
[38] A. Santi,et al. Cancer Associated Fibroblasts: The Architects of Stroma Remodeling , 2018, Proteomics.
[39] P. Kaufman,et al. Ki-67: more than a proliferation marker , 2018, Chromosoma.
[40] Bonnie N. Joe,et al. Imaging Neoadjuvant Therapy Response in Breast Cancer. , 2017, Radiology.
[41] A. Nitrosi,et al. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in neoadjuvant chemotherapy monitoring: a comparison with breast magnetic resonance imaging , 2017, Breast Cancer Research.
[42] Lihua Chen,et al. Direct comparison of PET/CT and MRI to predict the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[43] Youngho Seo,et al. Dedicated Breast Positron Emission Tomography for the Evaluation of Early Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer , 2017, Clinical breast cancer.
[44] Carlos L Arteaga,et al. Neoadjuvant Trials in ER+ Breast Cancer: A Tool for Acceleration of Drug Development and Discovery. , 2017, Cancer discovery.
[45] Leslie R Euceda,et al. Metabolic Portraits of Breast Cancer by HR MAS MR Spectroscopy of Intact Tissue Samples , 2017, Metabolites.
[46] A. Wienke,et al. Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and cellularity is different in several tumors: a meta-analysis , 2017, Oncotarget.
[47] Mary W. Yamashita,et al. Accuracy of Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing the Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer , 2017, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
[48] Eun Ju Son,et al. Shear-wave elastography in breast ultrasonography: the state of the art , 2017, Ultrasonography.
[49] H. Linden,et al. Functional Estrogen Receptor Imaging Before Neoadjuvant Therapy for Primary Breast Cancer , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[50] H. Kuerer,et al. Performance of Mid-Treatment Breast Ultrasound and Axillary Ultrasound in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy by Breast Cancer Subtype. , 2017, The oncologist.
[51] Sung-Bae Kim,et al. A Randomized Feasibility Study of 18F-Fluoroestradiol PET to Predict Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Estrogen Receptor–Rich Postmenopausal Breast Cancer , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[52] L. Philpotts,et al. Advances in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[53] Mei Liu,et al. Long-Term Prognostic Risk After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Associated With Residual Cancer Burden and Breast Cancer Subtype. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[54] J. Olson,et al. Ki67 Proliferation Index as a Tool for Chemotherapy Decisions During and After Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment of Breast Cancer: Results From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 Trial (Alliance) , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[55] M. Morrow,et al. Do Calcifications Seen on Mammography After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Always Need to Be Excised? , 2017, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[56] John Kornak,et al. Effect of MR Imaging Contrast Thresholds on Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer Subtypes: A Subgroup Analysis of the ACRIN 6657/I-SPY 1 TRIAL , 2016, Tomography.
[57] A. Bardia,et al. Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2016, JAMA oncology.
[58] T. Andreassen,et al. Estrogen Receptor α Promotes Breast Cancer by Reprogramming Choline Metabolism. , 2016, Cancer research.
[59] R. Kalluri. The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer , 2016, Nature Reviews Cancer.
[60] Hee Jung Shin,et al. Tumor apparent diffusion coefficient as an imaging biomarker to predict tumor aggressiveness in patients with estrogen‐receptor‐positive breast cancer , 2016, NMR in biomedicine.
[61] Geraldine J. Liao,et al. 18F-Fluoroestradiol PET: Current Status and Potential Future Clinical Applications , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[62] Hongmin Cai,et al. Discrimination of Breast Cancer with Microcalcifications on Mammography by Deep Learning , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[63] D. Mankoff,et al. Use of serial 18F-Fluorothymidine (FLT) PET and Ki-67 to predict response to aromatase inhibitors (AI) in women with ER+ breast cancer. , 2016 .
[64] Ronald M. Summers,et al. Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: Overview and Future Promise of an Exciting New Technique , 2016 .
[65] Mitchell D Schnall,et al. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Functional Tumor Volume by MR Imaging Predicts Recurrence-free Survival-Results from the ACRIN 6657/CALGB 150007 I-SPY 1 TRIAL. , 2016, Radiology.
[66] D. Collins,et al. Multi-parametric MRI in the early prediction of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Value of non-modelled parameters. , 2016, European journal of radiology.
[67] Martin A Lodge,et al. Practical PERCIST: A Simplified Guide to PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0. , 2016, Radiology.
[68] John Kornak,et al. Effect of Imaging Parameter Thresholds on MRI Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer Subtypes , 2016, PloS one.
[69] Farrokh Dehdashti,et al. Imaging Diagnostic and Therapeutic Targets: Steroid Receptors in Breast Cancer , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[70] N. Avril,et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for Monitoring of Treatment Response in Breast Cancer , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[71] Wei Huang,et al. Early Prediction and Evaluation of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Quantitative DCE-MRI1 , 2016, Translational oncology.
[72] R. Barroso-Sousa,et al. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer: current role and future perspectives , 2016, Ecancermedicalscience.
[73] K. Nikolaou,et al. Background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: correlation with tumour response , 2016, European Radiology.
[74] Thierry Metens,et al. Quantitative DCE-MRI for prediction of pathological complete response following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced breast cancer: the impact of breast cancer subtypes on the diagnostic accuracy , 2016, European Radiology.
[75] D. Groheux,et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT in the early prediction of pathological response in aggressive subtypes of breast cancer: review of the literature and recommendations for use in clinical trials , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[76] P. Lambin,et al. Radiomic Machine-Learning Classifiers for Prognostic Biomarkers of Head and Neck Cancer , 2015, Front. Oncol..
[77] Woo Kyung Moon,et al. Shear-Wave Elastography for the Detection of Residual Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[78] Olivier Gevaert,et al. Addition of MR imaging features and genetic biomarkers strengthens glioblastoma survival prediction in TCGA patients. , 2015, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.
[79] Benjamin Haibe-Kains,et al. Radiomic feature clusters and Prognostic Signatures specific for Lung and Head & Neck cancer , 2015, Scientific Reports.
[80] Saadallah Ramadan,et al. Utilisation of MR spectroscopy and diffusion weighted imaging in predicting and monitoring of breast cancer response to chemotherapy , 2015, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.
[81] Manran Liu,et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts: a multifaceted driver of breast cancer progression. , 2015, Cancer letters.
[82] Hon J. Yu,et al. Background Parenchymal Enhancement of the Contralateral Normal Breast: Association with Tumor Response in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy1 , 2015, Translational oncology.
[83] C. Criscitiello,et al. Neoadjuvant Model for Testing Emerging Targeted Therapies in Breast Cancer. , 2015, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[84] Vandana Dialani,et al. Role of Imaging in Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[85] P. Lambin,et al. CT-based radiomic signature predicts distant metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma. , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[86] Wei Shi,et al. The Preliminary Study of 16α-[18F]fluoroestradiol PET/CT in Assisting the Individualized Treatment Decisions of Breast Cancer Patients , 2015, PloS one.
[87] T. Tot. Early (<10 mm) HER2-Positive Invasive Breast Carcinomas are Associated with Extensive Diffuse High-Grade DCIS: Implications for Preoperative Mapping, Extent of Surgical Intervention, and Disease-Free Survival , 2015, Annals of surgical oncology.
[88] B. Adrada,et al. Histopathologic Correlation of Residual Mammographic Microcalcifications After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[89] S. Eccles,et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce high mobility group box 1 and contribute to resistance to doxorubicin in breast cancer cells , 2014, BMC Cancer.
[90] A. Gallamini,et al. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology , 2014, Cancers.
[91] Gianluca Franceschini,et al. Effect of breast cancer phenotype on diagnostic performance of MRI in the prediction to response to neoadjuvant treatment. , 2014, European journal of radiology.
[92] H. Ojeda-Fournier,et al. Calcifications on Mammogram Do Not Correlate with Tumor Size After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2014, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[93] Gideon Blumenthal,et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis , 2014, The Lancet.
[94] P. Lambin,et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.
[95] Jean B. Cormack,et al. Phase II study of 3'-deoxy-3'-18F fluorothymidine PET/CT (FLT-PET) in the assessment of early response in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC): Preliminary results of ACRIN 6688. , 2014 .
[96] S Detre,et al. Evaluation of FLT-PET-CT as an imaging biomarker of proliferation in primary breast cancer , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.
[97] John Kornak,et al. High resolution in vivo characterization of apparent diffusion coefficient at the tumor–stromal boundary of breast carcinomas: A pilot study to assess treatment response using proximity‐dependent diffusion‐weighted imaging , 2014, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[98] Kathleen A Cronin,et al. US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status. , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[99] G. Arpino,et al. Neoadjuvant treatment of HER2 and hormone-receptor positive breast cancer - moving beyond pathological complete response. , 2014, Breast.
[100] Xia Li,et al. Analyzing Spatial Heterogeneity in DCE- and DW-MRI Parametric Maps to Optimize Prediction of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer. , 2014, Translational oncology.
[101] J. Cha,et al. Assessment of extent of breast cancer: comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography. , 2013, Clinical radiology.
[102] A. Thompson,et al. Can shear-wave elastography predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with invasive breast cancer? , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.
[103] Jingyi Cheng,et al. Can Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography with the Dual Tracers Fluorine-18 Fluoroestradiol and Fluorodeoxyglucose Predict Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response of Breast Cancer? ----A Pilot Study , 2013, PloS one.
[104] Myles A Brown,et al. PET imaging of oestrogen receptors in patients with breast cancer. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.
[105] S. Partridge,et al. Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: protocol optimization, interpretation, and clinical applications. , 2013, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.
[106] M. Hatt,et al. Estrogen receptor‐positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐negative breast tumors , 2013, Cancer.
[107] N. Hylton,et al. High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging for monitoring breast cancer treatment response. , 2013, Academic radiology.
[108] A. Lambeir,et al. Selective Inhibitors of Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) with a (4-Quinolinoyl)-glycyl-2-cyanopyrrolidine Scaffold. , 2013, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.
[109] Les Irwig,et al. Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[110] Vicky Goh,et al. Are Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET Tumor Textural Features in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Associated with Response and Survival After Chemoradiotherapy? , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[111] E. Puré,et al. Fibroblast activation protein in remodeling tissues. , 2012, Current molecular medicine.
[112] Wendy B DeMartini,et al. Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: impact on diagnostic performance. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[113] Andre Dekker,et al. Radiomics: the process and the challenges. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.
[114] Teresa A. Brentnall,et al. Arousal of cancer-associated stromal fibroblasts , 2012, Cell adhesion & migration.
[115] N Houssami,et al. Early prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: systematic review of the accuracy of MRI. , 2012, Breast.
[116] U. Sharma,et al. Association of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status with total choline concentration and tumor volume in breast cancer patients: An MRI and in vivo proton MRS study , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[117] L. Esserman,et al. Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL. , 2012, Radiology.
[118] P. Fasching,et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[119] Patrick Granton,et al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. , 2012, European journal of cancer.
[120] M. Ellis,et al. Use of neoadjuvant data to design adjuvant endocrine therapy trials for breast cancer , 2012, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.
[121] P. Lønning,et al. Predicting long‐term survival and treatment response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy by MR metabolic profiling , 2012, NMR in biomedicine.
[122] S. Rodenhuis,et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ HER2− breast cancer: response prediction based on immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[123] F. Sotgia,et al. Anti-estrogen resistance in breast cancer is induced by the tumor microenvironment and can be overcome by inhibiting mitochondrial function in epithelial cancer cells , 2011, Cancer biology & therapy.
[124] S. Shousha,et al. Biological basis of [11C]choline-positron emission tomography in patients with breast cancer: comparison with [18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography , 2011, Nuclear medicine communications.
[125] Qifeng Yang,et al. Meta-analysis confirms achieving pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts favourable prognosis for breast cancer patients. , 2011, European journal of cancer.
[126] M. Espié,et al. Accuracy of perfusion MRI with high spatial but low temporal resolution to assess invasive breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study , 2011, BMC Cancer.
[127] Andreas Makris,et al. Use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to predict survival in patients with primary breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2011, Radiology.
[128] Jennifer D. Brooks,et al. Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk. , 2011, Radiology.
[129] Maryellen L. Giger,et al. Normal parenchymal enhancement patterns in women undergoing MR screening of the breast , 2011, European Radiology.
[130] Jie Li,et al. DW-MRI ADC values can predict treatment response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2011, Medical Oncology.
[131] A. Padhani,et al. Diffusion MR imaging for monitoring of treatment response. , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.
[132] Gang Huang,et al. Is 18F-FDG PET accurate to predict neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer? A meta-analysis , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[133] Woo Kyung Moon,et al. Comparison of diffusion-weighted MR imaging and FDG PET/CT to predict pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer , 2011, European Radiology.
[134] B. Naume,et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer-response evaluation and prediction of response to treatment using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging , 2010, European Radiology.
[135] Jun Li,et al. Quantitative analysis of clinical dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for evaluating treatment response in human breast cancer. , 2010, Radiology.
[136] Woo Kyung Moon,et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. , 2010, Radiology.
[137] Thomas E. Yankeelov,et al. Current and Future Trends in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessments of the Response of Breast Tumors to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2010, Journal of oncology.
[138] M. Ellis,et al. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in primary breast cancer: indications and use as a research tool , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.
[139] S. Shousha,et al. Reproducibility of [11C]Choline-Positron Emission Tomography and Effect of Trastuzumab , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.
[140] William E Gillanders,et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography and mammography in predicting pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. , 2010, American journal of surgery.
[141] D. Dabbs,et al. Immunohistochemical surrogate markers of breast cancer molecular classes predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2010, Cancer.
[142] M. Schwaiger,et al. Assessment of residual tumour by FDG-PET: conventional imaging and clinical examination following primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.
[143] Mikala Egeblad,et al. Matrix Crosslinking Forces Tumor Progression by Enhancing Integrin Signaling , 2009, Cell.
[144] S. Shousha,et al. [11C]Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.
[145] Corinne Balleyguier,et al. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography , 2006 .
[146] U. Sharma,et al. Longitudinal study of the assessment by MRI and diffusion‐weighted imaging of tumor response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2009, NMR in biomedicine.
[147] Kenneth G A Gilhuijs,et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: initial results. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[148] Andreas Makris,et al. Early Changes in Functional Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict for Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary Breast Cancer , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.
[149] Jingqin Luo,et al. Outcome Prediction for Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer Based on Postneoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Tumor Characteristics , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[150] Julie R. Gralow,et al. Tumor metabolism and blood flow changes by positron emission tomography: relation to survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[151] David A. Mankoff,et al. Quantitative Imaging of Estrogen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer with PET and 18F-Fluoroestradiol , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[152] Laurie L Fajardo,et al. Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[153] Christos Hatzis,et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[154] V. Semiglazov,et al. Phase 2 randomized trial of primary endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor‐positive breast cancer , 2007, Cancer.
[155] Mark Muzi,et al. Tumor-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients: [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose and Beyond , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.
[156] Howard Y. Chang,et al. Decoding global gene expression programs in liver cancer by noninvasive imaging , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.
[157] Takashi Suzuki,et al. Aromatase localization in human breast cancer tissues: possible interactions between intratumoral stromal and parenchymal cells. , 2007, Cancer research.
[158] C. Perou,et al. The Triple Negative Paradox: Primary Tumor Chemosensitivity of Breast Cancer Subtypes , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.
[159] Serge Muller,et al. Dual-energy contrast enhanced digital mammography using a new approach for breast tissue canceling , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.
[160] Peter Gibbs,et al. Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.
[161] D. Mankoff,et al. Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[162] Bingshu E. Chen,et al. Effects of Estrogen Receptor Expression and Histopathology on Annual Hazard Rates of Death from Breast Cancer , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[163] G. Muehllehner,et al. Positron emission tomography , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.
[164] Roman Rouzier,et al. Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes Respond Differently to Preoperative Chemotherapy , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.
[165] L. Esserman,et al. MRI measurements of breast tumor volume predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence-free survival. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[166] N. Harada,et al. Tumor-stromal interaction through the estrogen-signaling pathway in human breast cancer. , 2005, Cancer research.
[167] M. Dowsett,et al. Biomarker changes during neoadjuvant anastrozole, tamoxifen, or the combination: influence of hormonal status and HER-2 in breast cancer--a study from the IMPACT trialists. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[168] Norman Boyd,et al. The Association of Measured Breast Tissue Characteristics with Mammographic Density and Other Risk Factors for Breast Cancer , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.
[169] M. Dowsett,et al. Short-term changes in Ki-67 during neoadjuvant treatment of primary breast cancer with anastrozole or tamoxifen alone or combined correlate with recurrence-free survival. , 2005, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.
[170] David A Mankoff,et al. PET imaging of cellular proliferation. , 2005, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[171] Daniele Regge,et al. Monitoring Response to Primary Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[172] J. V. van Engelshoven,et al. Preoperative estimation of the pathological breast tumour size by physical examination, mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study on 105 invasive tumours. , 2003, European journal of radiology.
[173] Robert B Livingston,et al. Changes in blood flow and metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[174] M. Ellis,et al. Letrozole inhibits tumor proliferation more effectively than tamoxifen independent of HER1/2 expression status. , 2003, Cancer research.
[175] Philip M. Long,et al. Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[176] Bradford A Moffat,et al. Evaluation of cancer therapy using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. , 2003, Molecular cancer therapeutics.
[177] M. West,et al. Gene expression predictors of breast cancer outcomes , 2003, The Lancet.
[178] Bradford A. Moffat,et al. Diffusion MRI: A New Strategy for Assessment of Cancer Therapeutic Efficacy , 2002, Molecular imaging.
[179] Yudong D. He,et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer , 2002, Nature.
[180] J. Bryant,et al. Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.
[181] R. Tibshirani,et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[182] M. Welch,et al. Metabolic flare: indicator of hormone responsiveness in advanced breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[183] Christian A. Rees,et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.
[184] N M Hylton,et al. Semi-automated analysis for MRI of breast tumors. , 1999, Studies in health technology and informatics.
[185] Anna L. Brown,et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[186] M. Welch,et al. The development of estrogen and progestin radiopharmaceuticals for imaging breast cancer. , 1997, Anticancer research.
[187] C. Claussen,et al. Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast. , 1997, Radiology.
[188] G Lutterbey,et al. Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. , 1997, Radiology.
[189] M. Welch,et al. Positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and 16alpha-[18F]fluoro-17beta-estradiol in breast cancer: correlation with estrogen receptor status and response to systemic therapy. , 1996, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.
[190] J E Mortimer,et al. Positron tomographic assessment of estrogen receptors in breast cancer: comparison with FDG-PET and in vitro receptor assays. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[191] Z. Baloch,et al. Pathologic response to induction chemotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the breast: a determinant of outcome. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.
[192] J. Healey,et al. Molecular cloning of fibroblast activation protein alpha, a member of the serine protease family selectively expressed in stromal fibroblasts of epithelial cancers. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[193] D. King,et al. Mammography in the assessment of response to medical treatment of large primary breast cancer. , 1993, Clinical radiology.
[194] M. Welch,et al. Preparation of four fluorine- 18-labeled estrogens and their selective uptakes in target tissues of immature rats. , 1984, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[195] M E Raichle,et al. Positron-emission tomography. , 1980, Scientific American.