Current Landscape of Breast Cancer Imaging and Potential Quantitative Imaging Markers of Response in ER-Positive Breast Cancers Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy

In recent years, neoadjuvant treatment trials have shown that breast cancer subtypes identified on the basis of genomic and/or molecular signatures exhibit different response rates and recurrence outcomes, with the implication that subtype-specific treatment approaches are needed. Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers present a unique set of challenges for determining optimal neoadjuvant treatment approaches. There is increased recognition that not all ER+ breast cancers benefit from chemotherapy, and that there may be a subset of ER+ breast cancers that can be treated effectively using endocrine therapies alone. With this uncertainty, there is a need to improve the assessment and to optimize the treatment of ER+ breast cancers. While pathology-based markers offer a snapshot of tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy, non-invasive imaging of the ER disease in response to treatment would provide broader insights into tumor heterogeneity, ER biology, and the timing of surrogate endpoint measurements. In this review, we provide an overview of the current landscape of breast imaging in neoadjuvant studies and highlight the technological advances in each imaging modality. We then further examine some potential imaging markers for neoadjuvant treatment response in ER+ breast cancers.

[1]  K. Hess,et al.  Neoadjuvant Talazoparib for Patients With Operable Breast Cancer With a Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variant. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Leah C Henze Bancroft,et al.  Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: A comprehensive review , 2020, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  L. Esserman,et al.  Additive value of diffusion‐weighted MRI in the I‐SPY 2 TRIAL , 2019, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  K. Pinker,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients with Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Provides Early Prediction of Pathological Response – A Prospective Study , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Colin A. Purdie,et al.  Are baseline ultrasound and mammographic features associated with rates of pathological completes response in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer? , 2019, Cancer Imaging.

[6]  Shou‐Tung Chen,et al.  Higher underestimation of tumour size post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy with breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—A concordance comparison cohort analysis , 2019, PloS one.

[7]  V. Brouste,et al.  Residual cancer burden index and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte subtypes in triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2019, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[8]  Eric A. Cohen,et al.  Prediction of Treatment Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer via Early Changes in Tumor Heterogeneity Captured by DCE-MRI Registration , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Sharbell Y. Hashoul,et al.  Practical uses of contrast‐enhanced spectral mammography in daily work: A pictorial review , 2019, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[10]  U. Haberkorn,et al.  Targeting of activated fibroblasts for imaging and therapy , 2019, EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry.

[11]  Jiang Daqing,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for the Assessment of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer , 2019, The American surgeon.

[12]  R. Barzilay,et al.  A Deep Learning Mammography-based Model for Improved Breast Cancer Risk Prediction. , 2019, Radiology.

[13]  L. Esserman,et al.  Initial experience of dedicated breast PET imaging of ER+ breast cancers using [F-18]fluoroestradiol , 2019, npj Breast Cancer.

[14]  Frederik L. Giesel,et al.  68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Tracer Uptake in 28 Different Kinds of Cancer , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  L. Kooreman,et al.  Does the subtype of breast cancer affect the diagnostic performance of axillary ultrasound for nodal staging in breast cancer patients? , 2019, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[16]  Li Li,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluating the pathologic response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2019, Medicine.

[17]  Li Shen,et al.  Deep Learning to Improve Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammography , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[18]  R. Barzilay,et al.  Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: Clinical Implementation. , 2019, Radiology.

[19]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Letrozole and palbociclib versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy of high-risk luminal breast cancer , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[20]  H. Kim,et al.  Comparison of mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, automated breast ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2018, European journal of radiology.

[21]  Zheng Zhang,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MRI Findings Predict Pathologic Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer: The ACRIN 6698 Multicenter Trial. , 2018, Radiology.

[22]  W. Moon,et al.  Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI for Evaluating Residual Tumor Size after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. , 2018, Radiology.

[23]  John M S Bartlett,et al.  An international multicenter study to evaluate reproducibility of automated scoring for assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer , 2018, Modern Pathology.

[24]  Jennifer D. Brooks,et al.  Histopathologic characteristics of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on breast MRI , 2018, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[25]  Frederik L. Giesel,et al.  68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Biodistribution and Preliminary Dosimetry Estimate of 2 DOTA-Containing FAP-Targeting Agents in Patients with Various Cancers , 2018, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  J. James,et al.  Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) , 2014 .

[27]  B. Pockaj,et al.  Breast MRI phenotype and background parenchymal enhancement may predict tumor response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy , 2018, The breast journal.

[28]  C. Perou,et al.  Pathological Response and Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Carboplatin plus Docetaxel , 2018, Clinical Cancer Research.

[29]  S. Rashmi,et al.  Predicting the molecular subtype of breast cancer based on mammography and ultrasound findings , 2018, Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging.

[30]  Weijun Peng,et al.  Decreased background parenchymal enhancement of the contralateral breast after two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with tumor response in HER2-positive breast cancer , 2018, Acta radiologica.

[31]  B. Kang,et al.  Pretreatment prediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Perfusion metrics of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[32]  H. Kim,et al.  Relationship between background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI and pathological tumor response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2018, The British journal of radiology.

[33]  C. Gross,et al.  Early adoption of digital breast tomosynthesis in the United States. , 2018 .

[34]  E. Puré,et al.  Pro-tumorigenic roles of fibroblast activation protein in cancer: back to the basics , 2018, Oncogene.

[35]  Vivek Verma,et al.  Response rates and pathologic complete response by breast cancer molecular subtype following neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2018, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[36]  Matthew F. Covington,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography is Comparable to MRI in the Assessment of Residual Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy , 2018, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[37]  T. Yamanaka,et al.  Impact of clinical response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy on patient outcomes: a follow-up study of JFMC34-0601 multicentre prospective neoadjuvant endocrine trial , 2018, ESMO Open.

[38]  A. Santi,et al.  Cancer Associated Fibroblasts: The Architects of Stroma Remodeling , 2018, Proteomics.

[39]  P. Kaufman,et al.  Ki-67: more than a proliferation marker , 2018, Chromosoma.

[40]  Bonnie N. Joe,et al.  Imaging Neoadjuvant Therapy Response in Breast Cancer. , 2017, Radiology.

[41]  A. Nitrosi,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in neoadjuvant chemotherapy monitoring: a comparison with breast magnetic resonance imaging , 2017, Breast Cancer Research.

[42]  Lihua Chen,et al.  Direct comparison of PET/CT and MRI to predict the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[43]  Youngho Seo,et al.  Dedicated Breast Positron Emission Tomography for the Evaluation of Early Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer , 2017, Clinical breast cancer.

[44]  Carlos L Arteaga,et al.  Neoadjuvant Trials in ER+ Breast Cancer: A Tool for Acceleration of Drug Development and Discovery. , 2017, Cancer discovery.

[45]  Leslie R Euceda,et al.  Metabolic Portraits of Breast Cancer by HR MAS MR Spectroscopy of Intact Tissue Samples , 2017, Metabolites.

[46]  A. Wienke,et al.  Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and cellularity is different in several tumors: a meta-analysis , 2017, Oncotarget.

[47]  Mary W. Yamashita,et al.  Accuracy of Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessing the Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer , 2017, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[48]  Eun Ju Son,et al.  Shear-wave elastography in breast ultrasonography: the state of the art , 2017, Ultrasonography.

[49]  H. Linden,et al.  Functional Estrogen Receptor Imaging Before Neoadjuvant Therapy for Primary Breast Cancer , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[50]  H. Kuerer,et al.  Performance of Mid-Treatment Breast Ultrasound and Axillary Ultrasound in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy by Breast Cancer Subtype. , 2017, The oncologist.

[51]  Sung-Bae Kim,et al.  A Randomized Feasibility Study of 18F-Fluoroestradiol PET to Predict Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Estrogen Receptor–Rich Postmenopausal Breast Cancer , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[52]  L. Philpotts,et al.  Advances in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[53]  Mei Liu,et al.  Long-Term Prognostic Risk After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Associated With Residual Cancer Burden and Breast Cancer Subtype. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[54]  J. Olson,et al.  Ki67 Proliferation Index as a Tool for Chemotherapy Decisions During and After Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment of Breast Cancer: Results From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 Trial (Alliance) , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[55]  M. Morrow,et al.  Do Calcifications Seen on Mammography After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Always Need to Be Excised? , 2017, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[56]  John Kornak,et al.  Effect of MR Imaging Contrast Thresholds on Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer Subtypes: A Subgroup Analysis of the ACRIN 6657/I-SPY 1 TRIAL , 2016, Tomography.

[57]  A. Bardia,et al.  Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[58]  T. Andreassen,et al.  Estrogen Receptor α Promotes Breast Cancer by Reprogramming Choline Metabolism. , 2016, Cancer research.

[59]  R. Kalluri The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer , 2016, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[60]  Hee Jung Shin,et al.  Tumor apparent diffusion coefficient as an imaging biomarker to predict tumor aggressiveness in patients with estrogen‐receptor‐positive breast cancer , 2016, NMR in biomedicine.

[61]  Geraldine J. Liao,et al.  18F-Fluoroestradiol PET: Current Status and Potential Future Clinical Applications , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[62]  Hongmin Cai,et al.  Discrimination of Breast Cancer with Microcalcifications on Mammography by Deep Learning , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[63]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Use of serial 18F-Fluorothymidine (FLT) PET and Ki-67 to predict response to aromatase inhibitors (AI) in women with ER+ breast cancer. , 2016 .

[64]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: Overview and Future Promise of an Exciting New Technique , 2016 .

[65]  Mitchell D Schnall,et al.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Functional Tumor Volume by MR Imaging Predicts Recurrence-free Survival-Results from the ACRIN 6657/CALGB 150007 I-SPY 1 TRIAL. , 2016, Radiology.

[66]  D. Collins,et al.  Multi-parametric MRI in the early prediction of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Value of non-modelled parameters. , 2016, European journal of radiology.

[67]  Martin A Lodge,et al.  Practical PERCIST: A Simplified Guide to PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0. , 2016, Radiology.

[68]  John Kornak,et al.  Effect of Imaging Parameter Thresholds on MRI Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer Subtypes , 2016, PloS one.

[69]  Farrokh Dehdashti,et al.  Imaging Diagnostic and Therapeutic Targets: Steroid Receptors in Breast Cancer , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[70]  N. Avril,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT for Monitoring of Treatment Response in Breast Cancer , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[71]  Wei Huang,et al.  Early Prediction and Evaluation of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Quantitative DCE-MRI1 , 2016, Translational oncology.

[72]  R. Barroso-Sousa,et al.  Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer: current role and future perspectives , 2016, Ecancermedicalscience.

[73]  K. Nikolaou,et al.  Background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: correlation with tumour response , 2016, European Radiology.

[74]  Thierry Metens,et al.  Quantitative DCE-MRI for prediction of pathological complete response following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced breast cancer: the impact of breast cancer subtypes on the diagnostic accuracy , 2016, European Radiology.

[75]  D. Groheux,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT in the early prediction of pathological response in aggressive subtypes of breast cancer: review of the literature and recommendations for use in clinical trials , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[76]  P. Lambin,et al.  Radiomic Machine-Learning Classifiers for Prognostic Biomarkers of Head and Neck Cancer , 2015, Front. Oncol..

[77]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Shear-Wave Elastography for the Detection of Residual Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[78]  Olivier Gevaert,et al.  Addition of MR imaging features and genetic biomarkers strengthens glioblastoma survival prediction in TCGA patients. , 2015, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[79]  Benjamin Haibe-Kains,et al.  Radiomic feature clusters and Prognostic Signatures specific for Lung and Head & Neck cancer , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[80]  Saadallah Ramadan,et al.  Utilisation of MR spectroscopy and diffusion weighted imaging in predicting and monitoring of breast cancer response to chemotherapy , 2015, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[81]  Manran Liu,et al.  Cancer-associated fibroblasts: a multifaceted driver of breast cancer progression. , 2015, Cancer letters.

[82]  Hon J. Yu,et al.  Background Parenchymal Enhancement of the Contralateral Normal Breast: Association with Tumor Response in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy1 , 2015, Translational oncology.

[83]  C. Criscitiello,et al.  Neoadjuvant Model for Testing Emerging Targeted Therapies in Breast Cancer. , 2015, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[84]  Vandana Dialani,et al.  Role of Imaging in Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[85]  P. Lambin,et al.  CT-based radiomic signature predicts distant metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma. , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[86]  Wei Shi,et al.  The Preliminary Study of 16α-[18F]fluoroestradiol PET/CT in Assisting the Individualized Treatment Decisions of Breast Cancer Patients , 2015, PloS one.

[87]  T. Tot Early (<10 mm) HER2-Positive Invasive Breast Carcinomas are Associated with Extensive Diffuse High-Grade DCIS: Implications for Preoperative Mapping, Extent of Surgical Intervention, and Disease-Free Survival , 2015, Annals of surgical oncology.

[88]  B. Adrada,et al.  Histopathologic Correlation of Residual Mammographic Microcalcifications After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[89]  S. Eccles,et al.  Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce high mobility group box 1 and contribute to resistance to doxorubicin in breast cancer cells , 2014, BMC Cancer.

[90]  A. Gallamini,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology , 2014, Cancers.

[91]  Gianluca Franceschini,et al.  Effect of breast cancer phenotype on diagnostic performance of MRI in the prediction to response to neoadjuvant treatment. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[92]  H. Ojeda-Fournier,et al.  Calcifications on Mammogram Do Not Correlate with Tumor Size After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2014, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[93]  Gideon Blumenthal,et al.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis , 2014, The Lancet.

[94]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.

[95]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Phase II study of 3'-deoxy-3'-18F fluorothymidine PET/CT (FLT-PET) in the assessment of early response in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC): Preliminary results of ACRIN 6688. , 2014 .

[96]  S Detre,et al.  Evaluation of FLT-PET-CT as an imaging biomarker of proliferation in primary breast cancer , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[97]  John Kornak,et al.  High resolution in vivo characterization of apparent diffusion coefficient at the tumor–stromal boundary of breast carcinomas: A pilot study to assess treatment response using proximity‐dependent diffusion‐weighted imaging , 2014, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[98]  Kathleen A Cronin,et al.  US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status. , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[99]  G. Arpino,et al.  Neoadjuvant treatment of HER2 and hormone-receptor positive breast cancer - moving beyond pathological complete response. , 2014, Breast.

[100]  Xia Li,et al.  Analyzing Spatial Heterogeneity in DCE- and DW-MRI Parametric Maps to Optimize Prediction of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[101]  J. Cha,et al.  Assessment of extent of breast cancer: comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography. , 2013, Clinical radiology.

[102]  A. Thompson,et al.  Can shear-wave elastography predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with invasive breast cancer? , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[103]  Jingyi Cheng,et al.  Can Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography with the Dual Tracers Fluorine-18 Fluoroestradiol and Fluorodeoxyglucose Predict Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response of Breast Cancer? ----A Pilot Study , 2013, PloS one.

[104]  Myles A Brown,et al.  PET imaging of oestrogen receptors in patients with breast cancer. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[105]  S. Partridge,et al.  Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: protocol optimization, interpretation, and clinical applications. , 2013, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[106]  M. Hatt,et al.  Estrogen receptor‐positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐negative breast tumors , 2013, Cancer.

[107]  N. Hylton,et al.  High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging for monitoring breast cancer treatment response. , 2013, Academic radiology.

[108]  A. Lambeir,et al.  Selective Inhibitors of Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) with a (4-Quinolinoyl)-glycyl-2-cyanopyrrolidine Scaffold. , 2013, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[109]  Les Irwig,et al.  Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[110]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Are Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET Tumor Textural Features in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Associated with Response and Survival After Chemoradiotherapy? , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[111]  E. Puré,et al.  Fibroblast activation protein in remodeling tissues. , 2012, Current molecular medicine.

[112]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: impact on diagnostic performance. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[113]  Andre Dekker,et al.  Radiomics: the process and the challenges. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[114]  Teresa A. Brentnall,et al.  Arousal of cancer-associated stromal fibroblasts , 2012, Cell adhesion & migration.

[115]  N Houssami,et al.  Early prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: systematic review of the accuracy of MRI. , 2012, Breast.

[116]  U. Sharma,et al.  Association of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status with total choline concentration and tumor volume in breast cancer patients: An MRI and in vivo proton MRS study , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[117]  L. Esserman,et al.  Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL. , 2012, Radiology.

[118]  P. Fasching,et al.  Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[119]  Patrick Granton,et al.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[120]  M. Ellis,et al.  Use of neoadjuvant data to design adjuvant endocrine therapy trials for breast cancer , 2012, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[121]  P. Lønning,et al.  Predicting long‐term survival and treatment response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy by MR metabolic profiling , 2012, NMR in biomedicine.

[122]  S. Rodenhuis,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ HER2− breast cancer: response prediction based on immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[123]  F. Sotgia,et al.  Anti-estrogen resistance in breast cancer is induced by the tumor microenvironment and can be overcome by inhibiting mitochondrial function in epithelial cancer cells , 2011, Cancer biology & therapy.

[124]  S. Shousha,et al.  Biological basis of [11C]choline-positron emission tomography in patients with breast cancer: comparison with [18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography , 2011, Nuclear medicine communications.

[125]  Qifeng Yang,et al.  Meta-analysis confirms achieving pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts favourable prognosis for breast cancer patients. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[126]  M. Espié,et al.  Accuracy of perfusion MRI with high spatial but low temporal resolution to assess invasive breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study , 2011, BMC Cancer.

[127]  Andreas Makris,et al.  Use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to predict survival in patients with primary breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2011, Radiology.

[128]  Jennifer D. Brooks,et al.  Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk. , 2011, Radiology.

[129]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Normal parenchymal enhancement patterns in women undergoing MR screening of the breast , 2011, European Radiology.

[130]  Jie Li,et al.  DW-MRI ADC values can predict treatment response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2011, Medical Oncology.

[131]  A. Padhani,et al.  Diffusion MR imaging for monitoring of treatment response. , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[132]  Gang Huang,et al.  Is 18F-FDG PET accurate to predict neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer? A meta-analysis , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[133]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Comparison of diffusion-weighted MR imaging and FDG PET/CT to predict pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer , 2011, European Radiology.

[134]  B. Naume,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer-response evaluation and prediction of response to treatment using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging , 2010, European Radiology.

[135]  Jun Li,et al.  Quantitative analysis of clinical dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for evaluating treatment response in human breast cancer. , 2010, Radiology.

[136]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. , 2010, Radiology.

[137]  Thomas E. Yankeelov,et al.  Current and Future Trends in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessments of the Response of Breast Tumors to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2010, Journal of oncology.

[138]  M. Ellis,et al.  Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in primary breast cancer: indications and use as a research tool , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.

[139]  S. Shousha,et al.  Reproducibility of [11C]Choline-Positron Emission Tomography and Effect of Trastuzumab , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[140]  William E Gillanders,et al.  Accuracy of ultrasonography and mammography in predicting pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. , 2010, American journal of surgery.

[141]  D. Dabbs,et al.  Immunohistochemical surrogate markers of breast cancer molecular classes predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2010, Cancer.

[142]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Assessment of residual tumour by FDG-PET: conventional imaging and clinical examination following primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[143]  Mikala Egeblad,et al.  Matrix Crosslinking Forces Tumor Progression by Enhancing Integrin Signaling , 2009, Cell.

[144]  S. Shousha,et al.  [11C]Choline Positron Emission Tomography in Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[145]  Corinne Balleyguier,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography , 2006 .

[146]  U. Sharma,et al.  Longitudinal study of the assessment by MRI and diffusion‐weighted imaging of tumor response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2009, NMR in biomedicine.

[147]  Kenneth G A Gilhuijs,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: initial results. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[148]  Andreas Makris,et al.  Early Changes in Functional Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict for Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary Breast Cancer , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[149]  Jingqin Luo,et al.  Outcome Prediction for Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer Based on Postneoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Tumor Characteristics , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[150]  Julie R. Gralow,et al.  Tumor metabolism and blood flow changes by positron emission tomography: relation to survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[151]  David A. Mankoff,et al.  Quantitative Imaging of Estrogen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer with PET and 18F-Fluoroestradiol , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[152]  Laurie L Fajardo,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[153]  Christos Hatzis,et al.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[154]  V. Semiglazov,et al.  Phase 2 randomized trial of primary endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor‐positive breast cancer , 2007, Cancer.

[155]  Mark Muzi,et al.  Tumor-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients: [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose and Beyond , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[156]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Decoding global gene expression programs in liver cancer by noninvasive imaging , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[157]  Takashi Suzuki,et al.  Aromatase localization in human breast cancer tissues: possible interactions between intratumoral stromal and parenchymal cells. , 2007, Cancer research.

[158]  C. Perou,et al.  The Triple Negative Paradox: Primary Tumor Chemosensitivity of Breast Cancer Subtypes , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[159]  Serge Muller,et al.  Dual-energy contrast enhanced digital mammography using a new approach for breast tissue canceling , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[160]  Peter Gibbs,et al.  Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[161]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[162]  Bingshu E. Chen,et al.  Effects of Estrogen Receptor Expression and Histopathology on Annual Hazard Rates of Death from Breast Cancer , 2006, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[163]  G. Muehllehner,et al.  Positron emission tomography , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[164]  Roman Rouzier,et al.  Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes Respond Differently to Preoperative Chemotherapy , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[165]  L. Esserman,et al.  MRI measurements of breast tumor volume predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence-free survival. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[166]  N. Harada,et al.  Tumor-stromal interaction through the estrogen-signaling pathway in human breast cancer. , 2005, Cancer research.

[167]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Biomarker changes during neoadjuvant anastrozole, tamoxifen, or the combination: influence of hormonal status and HER-2 in breast cancer--a study from the IMPACT trialists. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[168]  Norman Boyd,et al.  The Association of Measured Breast Tissue Characteristics with Mammographic Density and Other Risk Factors for Breast Cancer , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[169]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Short-term changes in Ki-67 during neoadjuvant treatment of primary breast cancer with anastrozole or tamoxifen alone or combined correlate with recurrence-free survival. , 2005, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[170]  David A Mankoff,et al.  PET imaging of cellular proliferation. , 2005, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[171]  Daniele Regge,et al.  Monitoring Response to Primary Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[172]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Preoperative estimation of the pathological breast tumour size by physical examination, mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study on 105 invasive tumours. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[173]  Robert B Livingston,et al.  Changes in blood flow and metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[174]  M. Ellis,et al.  Letrozole inhibits tumor proliferation more effectively than tamoxifen independent of HER1/2 expression status. , 2003, Cancer research.

[175]  Philip M. Long,et al.  Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[176]  Bradford A Moffat,et al.  Evaluation of cancer therapy using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. , 2003, Molecular cancer therapeutics.

[177]  M. West,et al.  Gene expression predictors of breast cancer outcomes , 2003, The Lancet.

[178]  Bradford A. Moffat,et al.  Diffusion MRI: A New Strategy for Assessment of Cancer Therapeutic Efficacy , 2002, Molecular imaging.

[179]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer , 2002, Nature.

[180]  J. Bryant,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[181]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[182]  M. Welch,et al.  Metabolic flare: indicator of hormone responsiveness in advanced breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[183]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[184]  N M Hylton,et al.  Semi-automated analysis for MRI of breast tumors. , 1999, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[185]  Anna L. Brown,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[186]  M. Welch,et al.  The development of estrogen and progestin radiopharmaceuticals for imaging breast cancer. , 1997, Anticancer research.

[187]  C. Claussen,et al.  Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast. , 1997, Radiology.

[188]  G Lutterbey,et al.  Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. , 1997, Radiology.

[189]  M. Welch,et al.  Positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and 16alpha-[18F]fluoro-17beta-estradiol in breast cancer: correlation with estrogen receptor status and response to systemic therapy. , 1996, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[190]  J E Mortimer,et al.  Positron tomographic assessment of estrogen receptors in breast cancer: comparison with FDG-PET and in vitro receptor assays. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[191]  Z. Baloch,et al.  Pathologic response to induction chemotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the breast: a determinant of outcome. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[192]  J. Healey,et al.  Molecular cloning of fibroblast activation protein alpha, a member of the serine protease family selectively expressed in stromal fibroblasts of epithelial cancers. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[193]  D. King,et al.  Mammography in the assessment of response to medical treatment of large primary breast cancer. , 1993, Clinical radiology.

[194]  M. Welch,et al.  Preparation of four fluorine- 18-labeled estrogens and their selective uptakes in target tissues of immature rats. , 1984, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[195]  M E Raichle,et al.  Positron-emission tomography. , 1980, Scientific American.