Neuromagnetic fields reveal cortical plasticity when learning an auditory discrimination task

Auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields of the primary and association auditory cortices were recorded while subjects learned to discriminate small differences in frequency and intensity between two consecutive tones. When discrimination was no better than chance, evoked field patterns across the scalp manifested no significant differences between correct and incorrect responses. However, when performance was correct on at least 75% of the trials, the spatial pattern of magnetic field differed significantly between correct and incorrect responses during the first 70 ms following the onset of the second tone. In this respect, the magnetic field pattern predicted when the subject would make an incorrect judgment more than 100 ms prior to indicating the judgment by a button press. One subject improved discrimination for much smaller differences between stimuli after 200 h of training. Evidence of cortical plasticity with improved discrimination is provided by an accompanying decrease of the relative magnetic field amplitude of the 100 ms response components in the primary and association auditory cortices.

[1]  Y Sakurai,et al.  Involvement of auditory cortical and hippocampal neurons in auditory working memory and reference memory in the rat , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  S. Williamson,et al.  Tonotopic organization of human auditory association cortex , 1994, Brain Research.

[3]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning , 1995, Nature.

[6]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[7]  K. Ciesielski,et al.  Event-related potentials before and after training: Chronometry and lateralization of visual N1 and N2 , 1989, Biological Psychology.

[8]  Norman M. Weinberger,et al.  Classical conditioning induces CS-specific receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex of the guinea pig , 1990, Brain Research.

[9]  B. Schreurs,et al.  A functional anatomical study of associative learning in humans. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Norman M. Weinberger,et al.  Sensitization induced receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex is independent of CS-modality , 1992, Brain Research.

[11]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  W. B. Matthews.  Motivation, motor and sensory processes of the brain: electrical potentials, behaviour and clinical use. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium Ulm-Reisensburg. May 14-18, 1979. , 1982, Progress in brain research.

[13]  J. Edeline,et al.  Receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex during frequency discrimination training: selective retuning independent of task difficulty. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[14]  G. Orban,et al.  Does Practice in Orientation Discrimination Lead to Changes in the Response Properties of Macaque Inferior Temporal Neurons? , 1994, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 2004 .

[16]  H. Nordby,et al.  Hemisphere Differences in Conditional Learning: An Erp-Study , 1991, Cortex.

[17]  E. Donchin,et al.  After a Rash Action: Latency and Amplitude of the P300 Following Fast Guesses , 2021, Neurophysiology and Psychophysiology.

[18]  J. Edeline.  Frequency-specific plasticity of single unit discharges in the rat medial geniculate body , 1990, Brain Research.

[19]  J. Kaas.  Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult mammals. , 1991, Annual review of neuroscience.

[20]  Y Sakurai,et al.  Cells in the rat auditory system have sensory-delay correlates during the performance of an auditory working memory task. , 1990, Behavioral neuroscience.

[21]  N. Weinberger.  Dynamic regulation of receptive fields and maps in the adult sensory cortex. , 1995, Annual Review of Neuroscience.

[22]  William M. Jenkins,et al.  Neocortical representational dynamics in adult primates: Implications for neuropsychology , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Neuronal plasticity that underlies improvement in perceptual performance. , 1994, Science.

[24]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Human auditory primary and association cortex have differing lifetimes for activation traces , 1992, Brain Research.

[25]  B. Renault,et al.  Correct and incorrect responses in a choice reaction time task and the endogenous components of the evoked potential. , 1980, Progress in brain research.

[26]  R. Parasuraman,et al.  Response and evoked potential latencies associated with commission errors in visual monitoring , 1975 .