Life cycle assessment of pavement: Methodology and case study

A life cycle assessment model is built to estimate the environmental implications of pavements using material, distribution, construction, congestion, usage, and end of life modules. A case study of three overlay systems, Portland cement concrete overlay, hot mixture asphalt overlay, and crack, seat, and overlay, is presented. The case leads to the following conclusions. It is reasonable to expect less environmental burdens from the Portland cement concrete and crack, seat, and overlay options as opposed to hot mixture asphalt while although the results have a high degree uncertainties. The material, congestion, and particularly usage modules contribute most to energy consumption and air pollutant. Traffic related energy consumption and greenhouse gases are sensitive to traffic growth and fuel economy improvement. Uncertainties exist in the usage module, especially for the pavement structure effect.

[1]  Rebecca M Brewster,et al.  Energy and Emissions Impacts of Operating Higher-Productivity Vehicles , 2005 .

[2]  David W. Keith,et al.  Using CaO- and MgO-rich industrial waste streams for carbon sequestration , 2005 .

[3]  Michael D. Lepech,et al.  Life Cycle Modeling of Concrete Bridge Design: Comparison of Engineered Cementitious Composite Link Slabs and Conventional Steel Expansion Joints , 2005 .

[4]  Margaret Bell,et al.  A comparative study of the emissions by road maintenance works and the disrupted traffic using life cycle assessment and micro-simulation , 2009 .

[5]  G Lundberg,et al.  The Swedish National Road Administration , 1996 .

[6]  D Goos,et al.  Environmental impacts and fuel efficiency of road pavements , 2004 .

[7]  Audrey Copeland,et al.  Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Asphalt Mixtures: State of the Practice , 2011 .

[8]  Melvin Pomerantz,et al.  Paving materials for heat island mitigation , 1997 .

[9]  S. Chandra.  Effect of Road Roughness on Capacity of Two-Lane Roads , 2004 .

[10]  Vinod K. Natarajan,et al.  The Performance of Future ICE and Fuel Cell Powered Vehicles and Their Potential Fleet Impact , 2004 .

[11]  Stephen T Muench,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment of Reconstruction Options for Interstate Highway Pavement in Seattle, Washington , 2010 .

[12]  Duncan Herfort,et al.  Sustainable Development and Climate Change Initiatives , 2008 .

[13]  Michael D. Lepech,et al.  Dynamic Life-Cycle Modeling of Pavement Overlay Systems: Capturing the Impacts of Users, Construction, and Roadway Deterioration , 2010 .

[14]  A. Rosenfeld,et al.  Global cooling: increasing world-wide urban albedos to offset CO2 , 2009 .

[15]  B. Lagerblad.  Carbon Dioxide Uptake during Concrete Life Cycle - State of the Art , 2005 .

[16]  Dave Amos.  Pavement Smoothness and Fuel Efficiency: An Analysis of the Economic Dimensions of the Missouri Smooth Road Initiative. , 2006 .

[17]  Arthur Wai-Cheung Chan.  Economic and Environmental Evaluations of Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Practice: A Case Study of Michigan DOT Pavement Projects , 2007 .

[18]  H Stripple.  LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF ROAD: A PILOT STUDY FOR INVENTORY ANALYSIS. SECOND REVISED EDITION , 2001 .

[19]  Gw Taylor,et al.  Effects of Pavement Structure on Vehicle Fuel Consumption - Phase III , 2006 .