The effectiveness of integrating teaching strategies into IRS activities to facilitate learning

Previous studies on the interactive response system (IRS) have generally adopted the lecture method to facilitate teaching and learning, while few have made efforts to investigate the learning effects of instructional methods and IRS activities on learning and teaching. The purpose of the present study was therefore to explore whether the use of the IRS with two different teaching methods would affect students' learning performance. A quasi-experimental design was employed, with the teacher conducting the course using the learner as leader strategy in the experimental group (E.G.) and the teacher leader strategy in the control group (C.G.). The experiment was conducted over a period of 15 weeks (a semester), and questionnaires were administered at the beginning, in the middle and after the experiment to elicit the learners' views on the IRS application. The results support previous research which found that using the IRS improved learners' engagement and interaction. They also provide further evidence that the use of the IRS with both teaching strategies not only had a short-term learning effect but could also be a tool for sustaining students' learning motivation and self-directed learning for long-term learning purposes. Besides, the use of the learner as leader strategy contributed to enhancing discussion in groups, especially for the leading groups. The use of the IRS with the learner as leader strategy benefited those who acted as leaders in taking the initiative to learn the course content, and also engaged the students who acted as learners in concentrating on the course because it was their classmates who were leading. Lay Description What is already known about this topic The interactive response system (IRS) facilitates course interaction, and increases course attendance and learning performance Most studies have integrated the IRS with lectures to facilitate teaching and learning What this paper adds The paper explored the effectiveness of using the IRS with two teaching methods on students' learning for a semester. The use of the learner as leader strategy with IRS benefited the learners who acted as leaders in taking the initiative to learn the course content, and engaged the students who acted as learners in concentrating on the course. Implications for practice and/or policy Students are benefited in taking the initiative to learn the contents through hosting the IRS activity. Teachers could adopt both lectures and learner as leader strategy with IRS to sustain students' learning motivation and self-directed learning for long-term learning purposes.

[1]  Walcir Cardoso,et al.  Learning a foreign language with a learner response system: the students' perspective , 2011 .

[2]  Vanessa Paz Dennen,et al.  From Interaction to Intersubjectivity: Facilitating online group discourse processes , 2007 .

[3]  Douglas K. Duncan,et al.  Clickers: A New Teaching Aid with Exceptional Promise , 2006 .

[4]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes , 2009 .

[5]  Frank Costin,et al.  Lecturing versus Other Methods of Teaching: A Review of Research , 1972 .

[6]  Samuel B. Pond Learner-Centered Use of Student Response Systems Improves Performance in Large Class Environments. , 2010 .

[7]  Richard Coyne,et al.  Mindless repetition: Learning from computer games , 2003 .

[8]  L. S. Vygotksy Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[9]  Jennifer A. Foote,et al.  The impact of individual and shared clicker use on students' collaborative learning , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[10]  W. Wood Clickers: A Teaching Gimmick that Works , 2004 .

[11]  Clyde Freeman Herreid,et al.  Gender differences in student performance in large lecture classrooms using personal response systems (‘clickers’) with narrative case studies , 2012 .

[12]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[13]  Yi-Chun Lin,et al.  Implementing clickers to assist learning in science lectures: The Clicker-Assisted Conceptual Change model , 2011 .

[14]  Adrienne Wright,et al.  Using clickers to improve student engagement and performance in an introductory biochemistry class , 2009, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[15]  Helena Seli,et al.  "Clickers" and metacognition: A quasi-experimental comparative study about metacognitive self-regulation and use of electronic feedback devices , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[16]  John G. Cullen,et al.  Student response systems and learner engagement in large classes , 2014 .

[17]  S. A. Becker,et al.  NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition , 2015 .

[18]  Jeffrey H. Kuznekoff,et al.  The Impact of Mobile Phone Usage on Student Learning , 2013 .

[19]  Hsien-Sheng Hsiao,et al.  Exploring the Factors Influencing Learning Effectiveness in Digital Game-based Learning , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[20]  Michèle Shuster,et al.  Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[21]  Michael E. Lantz,et al.  The use of 'Clickers' in the classroom: Teaching innovation or merely an amusing novelty? , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Alf Inge Wang,et al.  The wear out effect of a game-based student response system , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Yung-Ting Chuang SSCLS: A Smartphone-Supported Collaborative Learning System , 2015, Telematics Informatics.

[24]  Jeffrey R. Stowell,et al.  Use of clickers vs. mobile devices for classroom polling , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Greet Langie,et al.  Replacement of a clicker system by a mobile device audience response system , 2013 .

[26]  Ellen Johnson Serafini 11. Learner perceptions of clickers as a source of feedback in the classroom , 2013 .