Synovial fluid tests. What should be ordered?

To determine which synovial fluid tests are most useful, we prospectively analyzed the synovial fluid test results of 100 consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic arthrocentesis. Each patient's diagnosis was established independently of synovial fluid laboratory test results; in 69 patients a definite inflammatory or noninflammatory categorization could be made. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated for synovial fluid white blood cell count (sensitivity, 0.84; specificity, 0.84), percentage of polymorphonuclear cells (sensitivity, 0.75; specificity, 0.92), glucose (sensitivity, 0.20; specificity, 0.84), protein (sensitivity, 0.52; specificity, 0.56), and lactate dehydrogenase (sensitivity, 0.83; specificity 0.71). Receiver operating characteristic regression analysis indicated that both white blood cell count and percentage of polymorphonuclear cells were found to contribute independent diagnostic information but lactate dehydrogenase did not. In a separate, retrospective analysis of 19 patients with definite septic arthritis, similar results were observed. We conclude that synovial fluid white blood cell count and percentage of polymorphonuclear cells perform well as discriminators between inflammatory and noninflammatory disease. Ordering chemistry studies of synovial fluid should be discouraged because they are likely to provide misleading or redundant information.

[1]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[2]  P. Hasselbacher,et al.  Variation in synovial fluid analysis by hospital laboratories. , 1987, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  R. Moskowitz,et al.  Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. , 1986, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  R F Beckley,et al.  Clinical computing in a teaching hospital. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  J. Eisenberg,et al.  Usefulness of synovial fluid analysis in the evaluation of joint effusions. Use of threshold analysis and likelihood ratios to assess a diagnostic test. , 1984, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[7]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[8]  John A. Swets,et al.  Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory , 1982 .

[9]  P. R. Krey,et al.  Synovial fluid leukocytosis. A study of extremes. , 1979, The American journal of medicine.

[10]  F. Hoaglund,et al.  Diagnosis of osteoarthritis: the value of laboratory tests. , 1979, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[11]  J. Fries,et al.  Joint pain or arthritis. , 1976, JAMA.

[12]  S. Duncan,et al.  Recent Advances in Synovial Fluid Analysis , 1974 .

[13]  M. Gotze,et al.  Lactic dehydrogenase and LDH-isoenzymes in synovia and synovial tissue. , 1972, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[14]  E. Toone,et al.  Practical synovial fluid examination. , 1970, Virginia medical monthly.

[15]  E. Veys,et al.  Lactate dehydrogenase in synovial fluid diagnostic evaluation of total activity and isoenzyme patterns. , 1968, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[16]  T. R. Harrison Principles of internal medicine , 1955 .

[17]  W. Bauer,et al.  Synovial Fluid Changes in Joint Disease , 1953 .