Mepolizumab for Eosinophilic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BACKGROUND Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with an eosinophilic phenotype may benefit from treatment with mepolizumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against interleukin‐5. METHODS We performed two phase 3, randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, parallel‐group trials comparing mepolizumab (100 mg in METREX, 100 or 300 mg in METREO) with placebo, given as a subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks for 52 weeks in patients with COPD who had a history of moderate or severe exacerbations while taking inhaled glucocorticoid‐based triple maintenance therapy. In METREX, unselected patients in the modified intention‐to‐treat population with an eosinophilic phenotype were stratified according to blood eosinophil count (≥150 per cubic millimeter at screening or ≥300 per cubic millimeter during the previous year). In METREO, all patients had a blood eosinophil count of at least 150 per cubic millimeter at screening or at least 300 per cubic millimeter during the previous year. The primary end point was the annual rate of moderate or severe exacerbations. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS In METREX, the mean annual rate of moderate or severe exacerbations in the modified intention‐to‐treat population with an eosinophilic phenotype (462 patients) was 1.40 per year in the mepolizumab group versus 1.71 per year in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68 to 0.98; adjusted P=0.04); no significant between‐group differences were found in the overall modified intention‐to‐treat population (836 patients) (rate ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.12; adjusted P>0.99). In METREO, the mean annual rate of moderate or severe exacerbations was 1.19 per year in the 100‐mg mepolizumab group, 1.27 per year in the 300‐mg mepolizumab group, and 1.49 per year in the placebo group. The rate ratios for exacerbations in the 100‐mg and 300‐mg mepolizumab groups versus the placebo group were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.98; adjusted P=0.07) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.70 to 1.05; adjusted P=0.14), respectively. A greater effect of mepolizumab, as compared with placebo, on the annual rate of moderate or severe exacerbations was found among patients with higher blood eosinophil counts at screening. The safety profile of mepolizumab was similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS Mepolizumab at a dose of 100 mg was associated with a lower annual rate of moderate or severe exacerbations than placebo among patients with COPD and an eosinophilic phenotype. This finding suggests that eosinophilic airway inflammation contributes to COPD exacerbations. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; METREX and METREO ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02105948 and NCT02105961.)

[1]  J. Vestbo Triple-Therapie mit einem Inhalator , 2017, Pneumologie.

[2]  Dave Singh,et al.  Single inhaler extrafine triple therapy versus long-acting muscarinic antagonist therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (TRINITY): a double-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[3]  F. Albers,et al.  Efficacy of mepolizumab add-on therapy on health-related quality of life and markers of asthma control in severe eosinophilic asthma (MUSCA): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3b trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[4]  I. Pavord,et al.  Blood eosinophil count and pneumonia risk in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a patient-level meta-analysis. , 2016, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[5]  Christopher E Brightling,et al.  Severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab stratified by baseline eosinophil thresholds: a secondary analysis of the DREAM and MENSA studies. , 2016, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[6]  G. Canonica,et al.  Interleukin-5 pathway inhibition in the treatment of eosinophilic respiratory disorders: evidence and unmet needs , 2016, Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology.

[7]  I. Pavord,et al.  Blood eosinophils and inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β-2 agonist efficacy in COPD , 2015, Thorax.

[8]  J. Wedzicha,et al.  Blood Eosinophils: A Biomarker of Response to Extrafine Beclomethasone/Formoterol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. , 2015, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[9]  I. Pavord,et al.  Blood eosinophil counts, exacerbations, and response to the addition of inhaled fluticasone furoate to vilanterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a secondary analysis of data from two parallel randomised controlled trials. , 2015, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[10]  I. Pavord,et al.  Mepolizumab treatment in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  E. Bleecker,et al.  Benralizumab for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and sputum eosinophilia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a study. , 2014, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[12]  Dave Singh,et al.  Eosinophilic inflammation in COPD: prevalence and clinical characteristics , 2014, European Respiratory Journal.

[13]  Michael G Kenward,et al.  Missing data sensitivity analysis for recurrent event data using controlled imputation. , 2014, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[14]  I. Pavord,et al.  Blood eosinophil guided prednisolone therapy for exacerbations of COPD: a further analysis , 2014, European Respiratory Journal.

[15]  J. Bird,et al.  Mepolizumab for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma (DREAM): A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial , 2013, Pediatrics.

[16]  F. Martinez,et al.  Once-daily inhaled fluticasone furoate and vilanterol versus vilanterol only for prevention of exacerbations of COPD: two replicate double-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trials. , 2013, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[17]  C. Nejjari,et al.  Psychometric evaluation of the COPD assessment test: data from the BREATHE study in the Middle East and North Africa region. , 2012, Respiratory medicine.

[18]  Christopher E Brightling,et al.  Blood eosinophils to direct corticosteroid treatment of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. , 2012, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[19]  J. Maurer Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Identification of Biologic Clusters and Their Biomarkers , 2012 .

[20]  T. Seemungal,et al.  Reported pneumonia in patients with COPD: findings from the INSPIRE study. , 2011, Chest.

[21]  P. Jones,et al.  Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test , 2009, European Respiratory Journal.

[22]  P. Jones,et al.  Pneumonia risk in COPD patients receiving inhaled corticosteroids alone or in combination: TORCH study results , 2009, European Respiratory Journal.

[23]  S. Spencer,et al.  Development and Validation of an Improved, COPD-Specific Version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire. , 2007, Chest.

[24]  I. Pavord,et al.  Eosinophilic airway inflammation and exacerbations of COPD: a randomised controlled trial , 2007, European Respiratory Journal.

[25]  W. MacNee,et al.  Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paper , 2004, European Respiratory Journal.

[26]  P. Jones Interpreting thresholds for a clinically significant change in health status in asthma and COPD , 2002, European Respiratory Journal.

[27]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Preclinical efficacy and safety of mepolizumab (SB-240563), a humanized monoclonal antibody to IL-5, in cynomolgus monkeys. , 2001, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[28]  I. Pavord,et al.  Sputum eosinophilia and short-term response to prednisolone in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial , 2000, The Lancet.